Cited by 130Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The87Sr optical frequency standard at PTB

Open access
Falke, St, Schnatz, H, Winfred, J S R Vellore, Middelmann, Th, Vogt, St, Weyers, S, Lipphardt, B, Grosche, G, Riehle, F, Sterr, U, Lisdat, Ch·2011·Metrologia

Abstract

With 87 Sr atoms confined in a one-dimensional optical lattice, the frequency of the optical clock transition 5s 2 1 S 0 –5s5p 3 P 0 has been determined to be 429 228 004 229 872.9(5) Hz. The transition frequency was measured with the help of a femtosecond-frequency comb against one of Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB's) H-masers whose frequency was measured simultaneously by the PTB Cs-fountain clock CSF1. The Sr optical frequency standard contributes with a fractional uncertainty of 1.5 × 10 −16 to the total uncertainty. The agreement of the measured transition frequency with previous measurements at other institutes supports the status of this transition as the secondary representation of the second with the currently smallest uncertainty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0026-1394/48/5/022

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2009, Report of the 98th Meeting of the Comité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM)
  2. Gill P Riehle F, 2006, Proc. 2006 Meeting of the European Frequency and Time Forum
  3. Weyers S Bauch A Schröder R Tamm C Gill P, 2002, Frequency Standards and Metrology, Proc. 6th Symp., 64
  4. 1993, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ISO/TAG 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–130 of 130

Metadata

Authors
Falke, S., Schnatz, H., Winfred, J. S. R. V., Middelmann, T., Vogt, S., Weyers, S., Lipphardt, B., Grosche, G., Riehle, F., Sterr, U., & Lisdat, C.
Affiliations
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
Venue
Metrologia
Published
2011-09-12
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
399-407
ISSN
  • 0026-1394 (ISSN-L)
  • 1681-7575
OpenAlex
W2016860894
Cited by
129
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Metrologia (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
strontium-87, optical frequency standard, optical clock transition, one-dimensional optical lattice, femtosecond optical frequency comb, cesium fountain clock, atomic clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review