The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The status of varying constants: a review of the physics, searches and implications
Open accessAbstract
The observational evidence for the recent acceleration of the universe demonstrates that canonical theories of cosmology and particle physics are incomplete—if not incorrect—and that new physics is out there, waiting to be discovered. A key task for the next generation of laboratory and astrophysical facilities is to search for, identify and ultimately characterize this new physics. Here we highlight recent developments in tests of the stability of nature’s fundamental couplings, which provide a direct handle on new physics: a detection of variations will be revolutionary, but even improved null results provide competitive constraints on a range of cosmological and particle physics paradigms. A joint analysis of all currently available data shows a preference for variations of α and μ at about the two-sigma level, but inconsistencies between different sub-sets (likely due to hidden systematics) suggest that these statistical preferences need to be taken with caution. On the other hand, these measurements strongly constrain Weak Equivalence Principle violations. Plans and forecasts for forthcoming studies with facilities such as ALMA, ESPRESSO and the ELT, which should clarify these issues, are also discussed, and synergies with other probes are briefly highlighted. The goal is to show how a new generation of precision consistency tests of the standard paradigm will soon become possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“ALMA measurements of absorption spectroscopy toward high-redshift quasars bound the variation ∆α = α(z = 0.89)-α 0 to |∆α/α 0 | < 0.55p.p.m [14] [15,16].”
From Stress-energy tensor of a scalar field on a product spacetime with a time-dependent compact dimension (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E., & Schmidt, P. O. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.637 · Cited by 2,385
A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft
Bertotti, B., Iess, L., & Tortora, P. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01997 · Cited by 2,017
Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions
Rubin, V. C., & Ford, W. K., Jr. (1970) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/150317 · Cited by 1,942
Frequency Ratio of Al+and Hg+Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place
Rosenband, T., Hume, D. B., Schmidt, P. O., Chou, C. W., Brusch, A., Lorini, L., Oskay, W. H., Drullinger, R. E., Fortier, T. M., Stalnaker, J. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154622 · Cited by 1,450
Further evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from Keck/HIRES QSO absorption spectra
Murphy, M. T., Webb, J. K., & Flambaum, V. V. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06970.x · Cited by 514
Indications of a Spatial Variation of the Fine Structure Constant
Webb, J. K., King, J. A., Murphy, M. T., Flambaum, V. V., Carswell, R. F., & Bainbridge, M. B. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.191101 · Cited by 482
Quintessence as a runaway dilaton
Gasperini, M., Piazza, F., & Veneziano, G. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.023508 · Cited by 449
Hinterbichler, K., Khoury, J., Levy, A., & Matas, A. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.103521 · Cited by 262
Coupled variations of fundamental couplings and primordial nucleosynthesis
Coc, A., Nunes, N. J., Olive, K. A., Uzan, J.-P., & Vangioni, E. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.023511 · Cited by 178
Petrov, Y. V., Nazarov, A. I., Onegin, M. S., Petrov, V. Y., & Sakhnovsky, E. G. (2006) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.74.064610 · Cited by 127
Planck intermediate results: XXIV. Constraints on variations in fundamental constants⋆
Planck Collaboration:, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Battaner, E., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424496 · Cited by 125
New Limits on Variation of the Fine-Structure Constant Using Atomic Dysprosium
Leefer, N., Weber, C. T. M., Cingöz, A., Torgerson, J. R., & Budker, D. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.060801 · Cited by 123
Molaro, P., Centurión, M., Whitmore, J. B., Evans, T. M., Murphy, M. T., Agafonova, I. I., Bonifacio, P., D’Odorico, S., Levshakov, S. A., Lopez, S., et al. (2013) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321351 · Cited by 111
Self-citationRahmani, H., Wendt, M., Srianand, R., Noterdaeme, P., Petitjean, P., Molaro, P., Whitmore, J. B., Murphy, M. T., Centurion, M., Fathivavsari, H., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1356 · Cited by 108
Self-citationImpact of instrumental systematic errors on fine-structure constant measurements with quasar spectra
Whitmore, J. B., & Murphy, M. T. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2420 · Cited by 99
Quintessence Cosmology and Varying
Chiba, T., & Kohri, K. (2002) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.107.631 · Cited by 92
Time variability of α from realistic models of Oklo reactors
Gould, C. R., Sharapov, E. I., & Lamoreaux, S. K. (2006) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.74.024607 · Cited by 82
Evans, T. M., Murphy, M. T., Whitmore, J. B., Misawa, T., Centurion, M., D'Odorico, S., Lopez, S., Martins, C. J. A. P., Molaro, P., Petitjean, P., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1754 · Cited by 75
Self-citationOlive, K. A., Peloso, M., & Uzan, J.-P. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.043509 · Cited by 44
Nakashima, M., Ichikawa, K., Nagata, R., & Yokoyama, J. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/01/030 · Cited by 34
Stability of fundamental couplings: A global analysis
Martins, C. J. A. P., & Pinho, A. M. M. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.023008 · Cited by 32
Self-citationGyromagnetic factors and atomic clock constraints on the variation of fundamental constants
Luo, F., Olive, K. A., & Uzan, J.-P. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.096004 · Cited by 31
Consistency tests of the stability of fundamental couplings and unification scenarios
Ferreira, M. C., Frigola, O., Martins, C. J. A. P., Monteiro, A. M. R. V. L., & Solà, J. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.083011 · Cited by 29
Self-citationOklo reactors and implications for nuclear science
Davis, E. D., Gould, C. R., & Sharapov, E. I. (2014) · International Journal of Modern Physics E · doi:10.1142/s0218301314300070 · Cited by 24
INVESTIGATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS STABILITY BASED ON THE REACTOR OKLO BURN-UP ANALYSIS
ONEGIN, M. S., YUDKEVICH, M. S., & GOMIN, E. A. (2012) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s021773231250232x · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 205
- Rubin, 1980, Astrophys. J., 238, 471, 10.1086/158003 · DOI
- Shaver, 2003, 10.1007/b82980 · DOI
- Will, 2006, Living Rev. Relativ., 9, 3, 10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Particle Data Group, 2016, Chin. Phys. C, 40, 10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001 · DOI
- ATLAS Collaboration, 2012, Phys. Lett. B, 716, 1, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 · DOI
- CMS Collaboration, 2012, Phys. Lett. B, 716, 30, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 · DOI
- Lyth, 1999, Phys. Rep., 314, 1, 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00128-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Weinberg, 2013, Phys. Rep., 530, 87, 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 · DOI
- Sarangi, 2002, Phys. Lett. B, 536, 185, 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01824-5 · DOI
- Jeannerot, 2003, Phys. Rev. D, 68, 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.103514 · DOI
- Bucher, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.043505 · DOI
- Carroll, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 3067, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3067 · DOI · Paper page
- Dvali, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.091303 · DOI
- Uzan, 2011, Living Rev. Relativ., 14, 2, 10.12942/lrr-2011-2 · DOI
- Martins, 2014, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 47, 1843, 10.1007/s10714-014-1843-7 · DOI
- Ubachs, 2016, Rev. Mod. Phys., 88, 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021003 · DOI
- Pepe, 2013, Messenger, 153, 6
- Euclid Theory Working Group, 2013, Living Rev. Relativ., 16, 6, 10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Duff, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., JHEP03(2002), 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/023 · DOI · Paper page
- Chodos, 1980, Phys. Rev. D, 21, 2167, 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2167 · DOI
- Wu, 1986, Phys. Rev. Lett., 57, 1978, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1978 · DOI
- Kiritsis, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., JHEP10(1999), 010, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/10/010 · DOI
- Damour, 2003, Astrophys. Space Sci., 283, 445, 10.1023/A:1022596316014 · DOI
- Planck, 2016, Astron. Astrophys., 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · DOI
- Peccei, 1977, Phys. Rev. Lett., 38, 1440, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440 · DOI
- Thompson, 1975, Astrophys. Lett., 16, 3
- Campbell, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 345, 429, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)01652-S · DOI · Paper page
- Flambaum, 2006, Phys. Rev. C, 73, 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.055501 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferreira, 2013, Phys. Lett. B, 724, 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.055 · DOI · Paper page
- Murphy, 2014, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 438, 388, 10.1093/mnras/stt2204 · DOI
- Kozlov, 2013, Annalen Phys., 525, 452, 10.1002/andp.201300010 · DOI
- Albareti, 2015, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 452, 4153, 10.1093/mnras/stv1406 · DOI
- Dumont, 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 468, 1568
- Molaro, 2008, Astron. Astrophys., 481, 559, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078864 · DOI
- Bonifacio, 2014, Astron. Nachr., 335, 83, 10.1002/asna.201312005 · DOI
- Li, 2008, Nature, 452, 610, 10.1038/nature06854 · DOI
- Steinmetz, 2008, Science, 321, 1335, 10.1126/science.1161030 · DOI
- Murphy, 2016, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 461, 2461, 10.1093/mnras/stw1482 · DOI
- Murphy, 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 464, 2609, 10.1093/mnras/stw2535 · DOI
- Kotuš, 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 464, 3679, 10.1093/mnras/stw2543 · DOI
- Bainbridge, 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 468, 1639, 10.1093/mnras/stx179 · DOI
- Songaila, 2014, Astrophys. J., 793, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/103 · DOI
- Agafonova, 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 529, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016194 · DOI · Paper page
- Murphy, 2008, Science, 320, 1611, 10.1126/science.1156352 · DOI
- Kanekar, 2011, Astrophys. J., 728, L12, 10.1088/2041-8205/728/1/L12 · DOI
- Henkel, 2009, Astron. Astrophys., 500, 725, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811475 · DOI
- Ilyushin, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 85, 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.032505 · DOI
- Muller, 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 535, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117096 · DOI
- Bagdonaite, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.231101 · DOI
- van Weerdenburg, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.180802 · DOI
- Malec, 2010, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 403, 1541, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16227.x · DOI
- Bagdonaite, 2012, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 421, 419, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20319.x · DOI
- King, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.251304 · DOI
- Albornoz Vásquez, 2014, Astron. Astrophys., 562, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322544 · DOI
- Daprà, 2015, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 454, 489, 10.1093/mnras/stv1998 · DOI
- King, 2011, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 417, 3010, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19460.x · DOI
- Wendt, 2008, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., 163, 197, 10.1140/epjst/e2008-00820-x · DOI
- Bagdonaite, 2015, Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.071301 · DOI
- Levshakov, 2011, Astrophys. J., 738, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/26 · DOI
- Jansen, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.100801 · DOI
- Kozlov, 2011, Phys. Rev. A, 84, 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042120 · DOI
- Kozlov, 2011, Astrophys. J., 726, 65, 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/65 · DOI
- Jansen, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.052509 · DOI
- Salumbides, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 86, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022510 · DOI
- Darling, 2012, Astrophys. J., 761, L26, 10.1088/2041-8205/761/2/L26 · DOI
- Kanekar, 2010, Astrophys. J. Lett., 716, L23, 10.1088/2041-8205/716/1/L23 · DOI
- Darling, 2004, Astrophys. J., 612, 58, 10.1086/422450 · DOI
- Murphy, 2001, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 327, 1244, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04843.x · DOI
- Kanekar, 2012, Astrophys. J. Lett., 746, L16, 10.1088/2041-8205/746/2/L16 · DOI
- Rahmani, 2012, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 425, 556, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21503.x · DOI
- Curran, 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 533, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117457 · DOI
- Weiss, 2012, Astrophys. J., 753, 102, 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/102 · DOI
- Srianand, 2010, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 405, 1888
- Lentati, 2013, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 430, 2454, 10.1093/mnras/stt070 · DOI
- Levshakov, 2012, Astron. Astrophys., 540, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219042 · DOI
- Ferreira, 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124032 · DOI
- Pinho, 2016, Phys. Lett. B, 756, 121, 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.014 · DOI
- Webb, 2014, Mem. Soc. Astron., 85, 57
- Martins, 2015, Phys. Lett. B, 743, 377, 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.03.002 · DOI
- de Martino, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.083008 · DOI
- Levshakov, 2013, Astron. Astrophys., 559, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322535 · DOI
- João, 2015, Phys. Lett. B, 749, 389, 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08.018 · DOI
- Shelkovnikov, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.150801 · DOI · Paper page
- Fischer, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.230802 · DOI · Paper page
- Abgrall, 2015, 16, 461, 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.03.010 · DOI
- Fortier, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.070801 · DOI · Paper page
- Tamm, 2014, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.023820 · DOI · Paper page
- Huntemann, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.210802 · DOI · Paper page
- Guena, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080801 · DOI
- Ferreira, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.125025 · DOI
- Peik, 2015, C. R. Phys., 16, 516, 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.02.007 · DOI
- Ekström, 2010, Astron. Astrophys., 514, A62, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913684 · DOI
- Vieira, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.043003 · DOI
- Perez-Garcia, 2012, Phys. Lett. B, 718, 241, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.10.047 · DOI
- Bagdonaite, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.123002 · DOI
- Berengut, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.010801 · DOI
- Tremblay, 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 465, 2849, 10.1093/mnras/stw2854 · DOI
- Galli, 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123516 · DOI
- Gasser, 1988, Nucl. Phys. B, 307, 763, 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90107-1 · DOI
- Martins, 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 82, 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.023532 · DOI
- Cyburt, 2016, Rev. Mod. Phys., 88, 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015004 · DOI
- Avgoustidis, 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP06(2014), 062, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/062 · DOI
- Calabrese, 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083509 · DOI
- Bekenstein, 1982, Phys. Rev. D, 25, 1527, 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1527 · DOI
- Sandvik, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.031302 · DOI
- Barrow, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.023514 · DOI
- Barrow, 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 88, 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.103513 · DOI
- Leal, 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.027305 · DOI
- Wagner, 2012, Class. Quantum Grav., 29, 10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184002 · DOI
- Muller, 2012, Class. Quantum Grav., 29, 10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184006 · DOI
- Leite, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023503 · DOI
- Suzuki, 2012, Astrophys. J., 746, 85, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/85 · DOI
- Bergé, 2015, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 610
- Barrow, 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 72, 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043521 · DOI
- Damour, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.081601 · DOI
- Damour, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.046007 · DOI
- Damour, 1994, Nucl. Phys. B, 423, 532, 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90143-0 · DOI
- Neben, 2013, Astrophys. J., 769, 133, 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/133 · DOI
- Martinelli, 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP11(2015), 030, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/030 · DOI
- Silva, 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.024025 · DOI
- Hinterbichler, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.231301 · DOI · Paper page
- Olive, 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 77, 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043524 · DOI
- Davis, 2012, Astrophys. J., 748, 61, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/61 · DOI
- Brax, 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 84, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.123524 · DOI
- Lazanu, 2015, Phys. Lett. B, 747, 426, 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.034 · DOI
- Martins, 2016, 10.1007/978-3-319-44553-3 · DOI
- Martins, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.116017 · DOI
- Chiba, 2011, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP03(2011), 044, 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/044 · DOI
- Brax, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.044015 · DOI
- Pinho, 2017, Phys. Lett. B, 769, 491, 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.04.027 · DOI
- LoVerde, 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123506 · DOI
- Peebles, 2003, Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 559, 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559 · DOI
- Dabrowski, 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.123512 · DOI
- Calabrese, 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 84, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.023518 · DOI
- Nunes, 2004, Phys. Rev. D, 69, 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.123511 · DOI
- Vielzeuf, 2014, Mem. Soc. Astron., 85, 155
- Damour, 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/20/202001 · DOI
- Martins, 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.103501 · DOI
- Chiba, 2003, Prog. Theor. Phys., 110, 195, 10.1143/PTP.110.195 · DOI
- Martins, 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP08(2015), 047, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/08/047 · DOI
- Slepian, 2014, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 438, 1948, 10.1093/mnras/stt2195 · DOI
- Caldwell, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.141301 · DOI
- Marsh, 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.105023 · DOI
- Martins, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.023506 · DOI
- Chevallier, 2001, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 10, 213, 10.1142/S0218271801000822 · DOI · Paper page
- Doran, 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP06(2006), 026, 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/06/026 · DOI
- Mukhanov, 2013, Eur. Phys. J. C, 73, 2486, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2486-7 · DOI
- Garousi, 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083005 · DOI
- Martins, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123524 · DOI
- Sen, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., JHEP04(2002), 048, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/048 · DOI
- Sen, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., JHEP07(2002), 065, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/07/065 · DOI
- Bagla, 2003, Phys. Rev. D, 67, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.063504 · DOI
- Padmanabhan, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.021301 · DOI
- Lima, 2000, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 312, 747, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03172.x · DOI
- Fixsen, 2009, Astrophys. J., 707, 916, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916 · DOI
- Fabbri, 1978, Astrophys. Space Sci., 59, 223, 10.1007/BF00651052 · DOI
- Rephaeli, 1980, Astrophys. J., 241, 858, 10.1086/158398 · DOI
- Sunyaev, 1970, Astrophys. Space Sci., 7, 3, 10.1007/BF00653471 · DOI
- de Martino, 2012, Astrophys. J., 757, 144, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/144 · DOI
- Battistelli, 2002, Astrophys. J. Lett., 580, L101, 10.1086/345589 · DOI
- Luzzi, 2009, Astrophys. J., 705, 1122, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1122 · DOI
- Planck, 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 536, A8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116459 · DOI
- Planck, 2016, Astron. Astrophys., 594, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525823 · DOI
- Hurier, 2014, Astron. Astrophys., 561, A143, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322632 · DOI
- SPT, 2014, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 440, 2610, 10.1093/mnras/stu575 · DOI
- de Martino, 2015, Astrophys. J., 808, 128, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/128 · DOI
- Luzzi, 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP09(2015), 011, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/011 · DOI
- Bahcall, 1968, Astrophys. J., 152, 701, 10.1086/149589 · DOI
- Srianand, 2000, Nature, 408, 931, 10.1038/35050020 · DOI
- Ge, 2001, Astrophys. J. Lett., 547, L1, 10.1086/318890 · DOI
- Molaro, 2002, Astron. Astrophys., 381, L64, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011698 · DOI
- Cui, 2005, Astrophys. J., 633, 649, 10.1086/444368 · DOI
- Srianand, 2008, Astron. Astrophys., 482, L39, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809727 · DOI
- Noterdaeme, 2010, Astron. Astrophys., 523, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015147 · DOI
- Noterdaeme, 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 526, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016140 · DOI
- Muller, 2013, Astron. Astrophys., 551, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220613 · DOI
- Chluba, 2014, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 443, 1881, 10.1093/mnras/stu1260 · DOI
- Etherington, 1933, Phil. Mag., 15, 761, 10.1080/14786443309462220 · DOI
- Avgoustidis, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP02(2012), 013, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/013 · DOI
- Avgoustidis, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.043521 · DOI
- Hees, 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124064 · DOI
- Vielzeuf, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.087301 · DOI
- Sandage, 1962, Astrophys. J., 136, 319, 10.1086/147385 · DOI
- Loeb, 1998, Astrophys. J., 499, L111, 10.1086/311375 · DOI
- Liske, 2008, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 386, 1192, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13090.x · DOI
- Martinelli, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123001 · DOI
- Klockner, 2015, PoS A, ASKA14, 027
- Yu, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.041303 · DOI
- Martins, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.043001 · DOI
- Albrecht, 2006, Report of the dark energy task force, 10.2172/897600 · DOI
- Alves, 2017, Phys. Lett. B, 770, 93, 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.03.053 · DOI
- Leite, 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.123512 · DOI
- Molaro, 2008, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., 163, 173, 10.1140/epjst/e2008-00818-4 · DOI
- Overduin, 2012, Class. Quantum Grav., 29, 10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184012 · DOI
- TMT International Science Development Teams and TMT Science Advisory Committee, 2015, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 15, 1945, 10.1088/1674-4527/15/12/001 · DOI
- Maor, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 6, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.6 · DOI
- Upadhye, 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 72, 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.063501 · DOI
- Hook, 2013, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 371, 0282, 10.1098/rsta.2012.0282 · DOI
- Amendola, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.063515 · DOI
- Leite, 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.063519 · DOI
200 of 205 shown
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles
Irastorza, I., & Redondo, J. (2018) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.003 · Cited by 873
On the cosmological implications of the string Swampland
Agrawal, P., Obied, G., Steinhardt, P., & Vafa, C. (2018) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.040 · Cited by 576
The $H_0$ Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models
Schöneberg, N., Abellán, G. F., Sánchez, A. P., Witte, S. J., Poulin, V., & Lesgourgues, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.10291 · Cited by 463
The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models
Schöneberg, N., Abell'an, G. F., Sanchez, A., Witte, S. J., Poulin, V., & Lesgourgues, J. (2021) · Physics reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.07.001 · Cited by 400
Yu, H.-B., Ratra, B., & Wang, F.-Y. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a2 · Cited by 298
“…back through Tripathi et al. (2017), Lonappan et al. (2017), Rezaei et al. (2017), Magana et al. (2017), Anagnostopoulos & Basilakos (2017), and Martins (2017). those found earlier, with the GP method H(z) constraints on zda being significantly weaker than those determined by using…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Martins, C. J. A. P.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Martins, C J A P
- ORCID
- Martins, C J A P
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-11-02
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 126902
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2748851033
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 224
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 29
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- FCT/MCTES (Portugal) and POPH/FSE (IF/00064/2012)
- FCT (PTDC/FIS/111725/2009)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- variation of fundamental constants, fine-structure constant, muon anomalous magnetic moment, weak equivalence principle violation, fundamental physics tests, cosmic acceleration, precision spectroscopy, ALMA, espresso, Extremely Large Telescope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review