Cited by 13Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Microchannel neural interface manufacture by stacking silicone and metal foil laminae

Open access
Lancashire, Henry T, Vanhoestenberghe, Anne, Pendegrass, Catherine J, Ajam, Yazan Al, Magee, Elliot, Donaldson, Nick, Blunn, Gordon W·2016·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Microchannel neural interfaces (MNIs) overcome problems with recording from peripheral nerves by amplifying signals independent of node of Ranvier position. Selective recording and stimulation using an MNI requires good insulation between microchannels and a high electrode density. We propose that stacking microchannel laminae will improve selectivity over single layer MNI designs due to the increase in electrode number and an improvement in microchannel sealing. APPROACH: This paper describes a manufacturing method for creating MNIs which overcomes limitations on electrode connectivity and microchannel sealing. Laser cut silicone-metal foil laminae were stacked using plasma bonding to create an array of microchannels containing tripolar electrodes. Electrodes were DC etched and electrode impedance and cyclic voltammetry were tested. MAIN RESULTS: MNIs with 100 μm and 200 μm diameter microchannels were manufactured. High electrode density MNIs are achievable with electrodes present in every microchannel. Electrode impedances of 27.2 ± 19.8 kΩ at 1 kHz were achieved. Following two months of implantation in Lewis rat sciatic nerve, micro-fascicles were observed regenerating through the MNI microchannels. SIGNIFICANCE: Selective MNIs with the peripheral nervous system may allow upper limb amputees to control prostheses intuitively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/034001

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Originally made from polyimide, more recent microchannel designs are built from stretchable and softer materials such as PDMS.

    “While originally made from polyimide (FitzGerald et al., 2012), more recent microchannel designs are built from stretchable and softer materials such as PDMS (Musick et al., 2015; Lancashire et al., 2016).”

    From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Lancashire et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Starobin J M, Varadarajan V and Aravamudhan S 2011 High- density peripheral nerve resonant stimulation system Proc. BMES Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting (Hartford, Conneticut, USA)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lancashire, H. T., Vanhoestenberghe, A., Pendegrass, C. J., Ajam, Y. A., Magee, E., Donaldson, N., & Blunn, G. W.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lancashire, Henry T
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2016-03-22
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
034001
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2332787502
Cited by
13
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G036675/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
peripheral nerve recording, plasma bonding, electrode impedance, sciatic nerve, nerve regeneration, prosthetic control, upper limb amputation
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrodes, Electrodes, Implanted, Interferometry, Male, Metals, Neurons, Peripheral Nerves, Prosthesis Design, Rats, Inbred Lew, Silicones, Electric Impedance, Equipment Failure Analysis, Rats, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review