Cited by 70Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Does Not Provide Any Additional Value in Agoraphobic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Meyerbroeker, K., Morina, N., Kerkhof, G.A., Emmelkamp, P.M.G.·2013·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: A number of studies have demonstrated the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) in specific phobias, but research in seriously impaired patients with agoraphobia is lacking. In this randomized controlled trial with patients with agoraphobia and panic disorder, VRET and exposure in vivo were compared in terms of outcome and processes involved. Methods: Patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia (n = 55) were randomly assigned to receive 4 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) followed by either 6 sessions of VRET or 6 sessions of exposure in vivo or to a waiting list control condition. Results: Analyses showed that both active treatment packages were significantly more effective than no treatment and that no differences between VRET and exposure in vivo were found in three out of four outcome measures. On the panic disorder severity scale, however, CBT plus exposure in vivo was more effective than CBT plus VRET. The results show clear synchrony of temporal processes involved in VRET and exposure in vivo on weekly avoidance measures and cognitive measures. Further, it was shown that initial changes in agoraphobic cognitions during the CBT phase predicted later changes in agoraphobic avoidance behavior. Conclusion: These data support the notion that therapeutic processes involved might be the same in VRET and exposure in vivo. However, given the slight superiority of exposure in vivo above VRET, the costs involved in the implementation of VRET and the lack of long-term follow-up, VRET cannot yet be recommended for patients with agoraphobia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000342715

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyerbroeker, K., Morina, N., Kerkhof, G. A., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
170-176
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2034466669
Cited by
70
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, agoraphobia, panic disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, agoraphobic avoidance, treatment outcomes, therapeutic process
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Agoraphobia, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Severity of Illness Index, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Young Adult, Intention to Treat Analysis, Self Report, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review