The DOI matches its Crossref record; 297 of the 298 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 192 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Sex Differences in Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Should Know
Open accessAbstract
There is growing recognition of the problem of male bias in neuroscience research, including in the field of traumatic brain injury (TBI) where fewer women than men are recruited to clinical trials and male rodents have predominantly been used as an experimental injury model. Despite TBI being a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, sex differences in pathophysiology and recovery are poorly understood, limiting clinical care and successful drug development. Given growing interest in sex as a biological variable affecting injury outcomes and treatment efficacy, there is a clear need to summarize sex differences in TBI. This scoping review presents an overview of current knowledge of sex differences in TBI and a comparison of human and animal studies. We found that overall, human studies report worse outcomes in women than men, whereas animal studies report better outcomes in females than males. However, closer examination shows that multiple factors including injury severity, sample size, and experimental injury model may differentially interact with sex to affect TBI outcomes. Additionally, we explore how sex differences in mitochondrial structure and function might contribute to possible sex differences in TBI outcomes. We propose recommendations for future investigations of sex differences in TBI, which we hope will lead to improved patient management, prognosis, and translation of therapies from bench to bedside.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This scoping review compares human and animal TBI studies by sex and finds that human studies most often report worse outcomes in women, whereas animal studies most often report better outcomes in females. Injury severity, sample size, and experimental model interact with sex, and the authors highlight mitochondrial function and chromosomal/hormonal factors as underexplored mechanisms.
Key findings
- Among 156 human studies, the largest fraction (47%) reported worse outcomes in women than men; 26% reported better outcomes in women, 18% no sex difference, and about 9% mixed results. Among 43 animal studies, 44% reported females fared better than males, 14% females worse, 28% no sex difference, and 14% mixed results.
- Injury severity mattered: in human mild-moderate TBI, 60% of studies found women fared worse and only 9% better; in moderate-severe TBI, 34% found women worse and 46% better. In animal studies, 17% of mild TBI studies showed better outcomes in females, versus 55% of moderate-severe TBI studies.
- Study size mattered in humans: 52% of small studies (0–1000 patients) reported worse outcomes in women, while 67% of large studies (>10,000 patients) reported better outcomes in women.
- Animal model mattered: 55% of controlled cortical impact (CCI) studies reported better outcomes in females and none showed males doing better; in lateral fluid percussion injury, 40% showed females better and 60% females worse.
Methods
- Scoping review of PubMed searched without publication-date or language limits, using sex/gender and TBI terms; search generated 601 results in July 2018, plus 15 items from manual cross-referencing.
- Included original research on human adolescents/adults of reproductive age and animal studies; excluded reviews/meta-analyses, pediatric-only or geriatric-only studies, epidemiology-only human studies, non-TBI injuries, and non-English articles.
- Human and animal studies were classified into four outcome categories: worse in women/females, better in women/females, no difference, or mixed. Human studies were stratified by injury severity (mild-moderate GCS 9–15; moderate-severe GCS <12; nonstratified) and sample size; animal studies were grouped by injury model and severity.
Limitations
- The paper states that 37% of reviewed human studies provided no data on exclusions, and only 15% specifically reported extracranial injury status, limiting interpretation of sex differences. It also notes that some animal injury models had small numbers of studies, so model-specific trends should be viewed as preliminary.
- The paper states that mixed results are common and that outcome-measure selection can affect conclusions; it advocates multiple outcome measures and notes that sex and gender terms are often used interchangeably in the literature.
- Evident from the text: the review is a descriptive scoping synthesis rather than a meta-analysis, relies on PubMed and English-language articles, and excludes pediatric-only and geriatric-only populations, which may limit generalizability across the lifespan.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 192 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using the search criteria outlined above, we found 156 published studies that compared outcomes between men and women following TBI.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among medium-sized studies, 39% showed women faring worse than men”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that > 88% of studies of mild-moderate injury used SB outcome measures including selfreported symptoms (Table 2).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies of mildmoderate TBI that were more likely to use SB outcomes also tended to show worse outcomes in women than men.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although many studies explicitly exclude patients with history of neurological/psychiatric disorders and/or severe comorbidities, a surprising number (37%) of the studies we reviewed provided no data on exclusions.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Functional outcomes, defined as mortality or behavioral assessments of cognition or sensorimotor ability, were reported in 24 of the 43 animal studies.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 43Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neuropathological mechanisms including edema, cerebral blood flow regulation, oxidative stress, inflammation, glial activation, and tissue damage or cell death were identified in 36 studies.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 43Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our search found 43 studies that compared outcomes between male and female animals following TBI.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, the percentage of studies reporting females doing worse decreased with severity (Fig. 4, lower).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, more animal studies report better outcomes in females than those reporting worse or mixed results.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclear
- It may state two separate claims as one. 114
- Probably not a substantial claim. 90
- The quote only partly states this claim. 22
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that overall, human studies report worse outcomes in women than men, whereas animal studies report better outcomes in females than males.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, 76% of studies of > 10,000 patients used either S or CI as outcomes, whereas smaller studies relied on SB measures (66%, Table 2).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, among studies of moderate-severe TBI, 34% found that women fared worse than men and a greater proportion (46%) showed that women fared better (Fig. 2, lower right).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In studies of moderate-severe injury 52% used CI and/or S as outcomes, whereas only 30% included SB measures (Table 2).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A majority of the smaller studies (52%) reported worse outcomes in women compared with men, with fewer (23%) reporting better outcomes in women (Fig. 3, left).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Across all human studies, the largest fraction (47%) reported worse outcomes in women than men. 26% found better outcomes, in women, 18% found no sex difference, and only about 9% reported mixed results with women performing better on certain outcome measures and men on others (Fig, 2, upper panel).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“among large studies only 13% reported women faring worse. Moreover, most large studies reported that women did better than men (67%; Fig. 3, right).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Non-stratified studies that did not segregate patients by injury severity were split between those that showed women faring better (33%) and those that showed women faring worse than men (40%), with 19% reporting no sex differences in TBI outcomes or pathology (Fig. 2, lower left).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, a majority of studies of mild-moderate TBI found that women fared worse than men (60%), whereas only 9% of these reported better outcomes in women (Fig. 2, lower middle).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, among studies of mild TBI, only 17% showed better outcomes in females than males, whereas in moderate-severe TBI a larger proportion (55%) showed better outcomes in females.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, only 15% of studies specifically reported extracranial injury status, with similar numbers including versus excluding these patients.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although functional outcomes were reported in 149 of the 156 human studies, physiological/neuropathological measures were only reported in 24.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, studies of severe TBI were more likely to use CI and S as outcome measures and to show better outcomes in women.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among all animal studies, 44% reported that females fared better than males, 14% reported that females fared worse, with the remaining studies showing no sex differences (28%) or mixed results (14%; Fig. 4, top).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, mild TBI is associated with worse outcomes in women in clinical studies but mixed results in animal studies (Figs. 2 and 4).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in the review are representative of the literature on sex differences in TBI.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the CCI studies (55%) reported better outcomes in females than males, with none showing males doing better (Fig. 5).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As Figure 6 summarizes, among all human studies, women tend to do worse following TBI, whereas in animal studies, females tend to do better.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in the review are representative of the literature on sex differences in TBI.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In studies using CHI, 31% found females doing better and 23% showed females doing worse.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Figures 2 and 4 indicate that 9% of human studies and 28% of animal studies yielded mixed results per our definition.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in the review are representative of the literature on sex differences in TBI.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Restricting analysis to studies reporting more than one outcome indicates that 19% of human and 37% of animal studies reported mixed results.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in the review are representative of the literature on sex differences in TBI.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Historically, preclinical studies in neurotrauma have been performed exclusively in males”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The reviewed human and animal studies are sufficiently representative to support conclusions about sex differences in TBI outcomes.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An array of outcome measures has been used to study sex differences in TBI in both humans and animals.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The reviewed human and animal studies are sufficiently representative to support conclusions about sex differences in TBI outcomes.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Few studies have investigated potential effects of androgens or chromosomal contributions to sex differences in TBI outcomes.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The reviewed human and animal studies are sufficiently representative to support conclusions about sex differences in TBI outcomes.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies using the CCI model indicate that females do better and none show males with better outcomes.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The reviewed human and animal studies are sufficiently representative to support conclusions about sex differences in TBI outcomes.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fewer women than men are enrolled in clinical trials of TBI, in part because the incidence of TBI in men is far greater than in women.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] 19. Stein, D.G. (2015). Embracing failure: what the Phase III progesterone studies can teach about TBI clinical trials. Brain Inj. 29, 12591272.
- Not checked yetcites [21] 21. McCarthy, M.M., Pickett, L.A., VanRyzin, J.W., and Kight, K.E. (2015). Surprising origins of sex differences in the brain. Horm. Behav. 76, 3-10.
- Not checked yetcites [22] 22. Soldin, O.P., and Mattison, D.R. (2009). Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin. Pharmacokinet 48, 143-157.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Epidemiological data suggest that men are approximately 40% more likely to suffer a TBI compared with women in the general adult population, although the sex difference disappears above 75 years of age.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] 1. Faul, M., and Coronado, V. (2015). Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 127, 3-13.
- Not checked yetcites [2] 2. Coronado, V.G., McGuire, L.C., Sarmiento, K., Bell, J., Lionbarger, M.R., Jones, C.D., Geller, A.I., Khoury, N., and Xu, L. (2012). Trends in traumatic brain injury in the U.S. and the public health response: 1995-2009. J. Safety Res. 43, 299-307.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, are there differences in how men and women acquire their injuries? The answer appears to be yes, with women more likely to receive injuries from assault or violence in interpersonal relationships and men more likely to receive work-related injuries from falls and motor vehicle collisions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] 6. Chang, V.C., Ruseckaite, R., Collie, A., and Colantonio, A. (2014). Examining the epidemiology of work-related traumatic brain injury through a sex/gender lens: analysis of workers' compensation claims in Victoria, Australia. Occup. Environ. Med. 71, 695-703.
- Not checked yetcites [7] 7. Colantonio, A. (2016). Sex, gender, and traumatic brain injury: A commentary. Arch. Physical Med. Rehabil. 97, S1-S4.
- Not checked yetcites [8] 8. Iverson, K.M., Hendricks, A.M., Kimerling, R., Krengel, M., Meterko, M., Stolzmann, K.L., Baker, E., Pogoda, T.K., Vasterling, J.J., and Lew, H.L. (2011). Psychiatric diagnoses and neurobehavioral symptom severity among OEF/OIF VA patients with deploymentrelated traumatic brain injury: a gender comparison. Women Health Iss. 21, S210-S217.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, are there differences in how the brains of men and women respond to an injury at the cellular and molecular level? Again, the answer appears to be yes, with genetics and sex hormones likely to influence inflammation, edema, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, and mitochondrial function.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] 9. Demarest, T.G., and McCarthy, M.M. (2015). Sex differences in mitochondrial (dys)function: implications for neuroprotection. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 47, 173-188.
- Not checked yetcites [10] 10. Gunther, M., Plantman, S., Davidsson, J., Angeria, M., Mathiesen, T., and Risling, M. (2015). COX-2 regulation and TUNEL-positive cell death differ between genders in the secondary inflammatory response following experimental penetrating focal brain injury in rats. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 157, 649-659.
- Not checked yetcites [11] 11. Roof, R.L., Duvdevani, R., and Stein, D.G. (1993). Gender influences outcome of brain injury: progesterone plays a protective role. Brain Res. 607, 333-336.
- Not checked yetcites [12] 12. Villapol, S., Loane, D.J., and Burns, M.P. (2017). Sexual dimorphism in the inflammatory response to traumatic brain injury. Glia 65, 1423-1438.
- Not checked yetcites [13] 13. Farin, A., Deutsch, R., Biegon, A., and Marshall, L.F. (2003). Sexrelated differences in patients with severe head injury: greater susceptibility to brain swelling in female patients 50 years of age and younger. J. Neurosurg. 98, 32-36.
- Not checked yetcites [14] 14. Wagner, A.K., Bayir, H., Ren, D., Puccio, A., Zafonte, R.D., and Kochanek, P.M. (2004). Relationships between cerebrospinal fluid markers of excitotoxicity, ischemia, and oxidative damage after severe TBI: the impact of gender, age, and hypothermia. J. Neurotrauma 21, 125-136.
- Not checked yetcites [15] 15. Wagner, A.K., Fabio, A., Puccio, A.M., Hirschberg, R., Li, W., Zafonte, R.D., and Marion, D.W. (2005). Gender associations with cerebrospinal fluid glutamate and lactate/pyruvate levels after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit. Care Med. 33, 407-413.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although women have a lower prevalence of deployment-related TBI than men, as a growing number of women choose to serve in active military duty, their relative risk of sustaining combat-related injuries is likely to increase compared with their civilian counterparts.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] 4. Amoroso, T., and Iverson, K.M. (2017). Acknowledging the risk for traumatic brain injury in women veterans. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 205, 318-323.
- Not checked yetcites [5] 5. Amara, J.H., Stolzmann, K.L., Iverson, K.M., and Pogoda, T.K. (2018). Predictors of employment status in male and female Post-9/ 11 veterans evaluated for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 34, 11-20.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each and all of these factors might influence outcome in studies of sex differences in TBI.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Decreased cadence on a dual gait-cognition task in adolescent girls indicating impaired executive function up to 2 weeks post-TBI.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences GOS or mortality; CI, SB, S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in symptom severity; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lower excitotoxic oxidative damage in women”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-concussion symptoms and worse GOS-E in women at 3 months post-injury; SB; CI”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More nausea, light sensitivity, change in taste/smell and appetite, and poor sleep-related symptoms in women vs. age-matched men;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher rates of injury and longer recovery times in women soccer basketball players; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in cognitive tests between men and women; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better executive function in women; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Shorter duration of post-traumatic amnesia in women.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More verbal memory deficits in women but no differences on tasks, neurobehavioral symptoms, or chronic stress; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater symptom severity and longer time to return to baseline performance in women athletes; CI, SB”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better quality of life 8-24 years after TBI in women; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may be because patients surviving severe TBI are less likely to complete detailed cognitive testing, whereas a study of survival in patients with mild TBI might suffer from ceiling effects because few patients will die.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“difference in sleep disturbance after multiple concussions; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-concussive symptoms in women at 3 months post-TBI, mainly child-bearing age; SB”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Faster processing speed and reaction time in women athletes.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased sleep disturbance after single concussion in women, especially those above age 15.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When comparing these trends with sex difference findings across study size (Fig. 3), it seems that SB outcome measures used in smaller studies correspond to worse outcomes in women. In contrast, larger studies that use CI and S were more likely to report women faring better than men.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher mortality in the ICU and 6 months post-TBI in women.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in GOS 5 days post-TBI; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Depression exacerbated over time in women, but resolved over time men; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such a system of classification is unbiased because it avoids judgments on the relative importance of each outcome/symptom.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lower risk of mortality in women compared with men; S”
- Also stated in: § Table 1. Human Studies of TBI Comparing Outcomes by Sex · plain
“Lower mortality in women; S”
- Also stated in: § Table 1. Human Studies of TBI Comparing Outcomes by Sex · plain
“Lower risk of post-injury mortality in women; S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Table 1. Human Studies of TBI Comparing Outcomes by Sex · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-concussion symptoms in women, but no differences rate, loss of consciousness, amnesia, or confusion; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More women experienced post-concussion symptoms and disability, but differences in life satisfaction 3 years post-injury; SB; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lower mortality in women after blunt force injury; S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sustained hypoactivation in fMRI activity during memory tasks”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher risk of mortality in women in China; S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better scores on verbal memory in girls at 1 year post-injury;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More depressive symptoms in women; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences eye coordination or balance; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Less withdrawal and better social skills in girls 1 year post-TBI;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More vestibulo-oculomotor impairment and longer time to symptom resolution in women.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-concussive symptoms in adult women (ages 18-59) but not minor girls (ages 4-17), at 3 months post-TBI compared with men: SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-concussive symptoms and worse performance on tasks in women athletes up to 2 weeks post-TBI; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better visual memory in women.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More women with minor TBI were depressed and had incomplete return work 6-12 months post-TBI than men with similar injury severity; SB; CI”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences incidence of neuropathic pain following TBI; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better work capacity outcomes in women; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-traumatic headaches and longer recovery time 1-3 weeks post- TBI in women; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prolonged post-concussive symptoms 3 months post-TBI in women;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-concussive symptoms due to increased anxiety sensitivity”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subsequently, the paucity of women in clinical trials means that promising treatments are not being tested against the real biological substrate and may hamper translational success.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“level of oxidative damage correlated with GOS in women but not men”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better survival rates in post-menopausal women.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is likely because smaller studies can collect data prospectively from individual patients, whereas very large studies tend to extract data retrospectively from existing databases including medical records.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher severity and more concussion symptoms in women.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Worse neurocognitive performance and more post-concussion symptoms girls; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Because brain anatomy, cellular pathways, and drug pharmacokinetics can be affected by biological sex, 21,22”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] 21. McCarthy, M.M., Pickett, L.A., VanRyzin, J.W., and Kight, K.E. (2015). Surprising origins of sex differences in the brain. Horm. Behav. 76, 3-10.
- Not checked yetcites [22] 22. Soldin, O.P., and Mattison, D.R. (2009). Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin. Pharmacokinet 48, 143-157.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The workshop acknowledged that findings to date have been mixed, and concluded that numerous knowledge gaps still exist regarding the effects of sex in TBI.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More post-concussion symptoms and greater in vestibular reflexes in girls up to 3 weeks post-TBI.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Shorter length of hospital stay and better outcomes on 3-month women; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More impaired empathy in women post-TBI; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More severe post-concussion symptoms and anxiety in women; SB”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Shorter comprehension times in men;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better emotion recognition in women.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in symptom recovery or cognitive recovery; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More headaches and dizziness in women;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in neurocognitive abilities; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in sleep architecture; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“better memory and immediate recall women; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Lower cerebral perfusion pressure, higher intracranial pressure, and greater frequency of cerebral edema may contribute to higher mortality and unfavorable GOS 1 month postTBI in women. 13,24,25”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] 13. Farin, A., Deutsch, R., Biegon, A., and Marshall, L.F. (2003). Sexrelated differences in patients with severe head injury: greater susceptibility to brain swelling in female patients 50 years of age and younger. J. Neurosurg. 98, 32-36.
- Not checked yetcites [24] 24. Balestreri, M., Steiner, L.A., and Czosnyka, M. (2003). Sex-related differences and traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 99, 616; author reply 616-617.
- Not checked yetcites [25] 25. Czosnyka, M., Radolovich, D., Balestreri, M., Lavinio, A., Hutchinson, P., Timofeev, I., Smielewski, P., and Pickard, J.D. (2008). Gender-related differences in intracranial hypertension and outcome after traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 102, 25-28.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in 6-month GOS; S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher levels of dopamine metabolites in CSF of women”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Systolic blood pressure was in pubescent and pre- pubescent girls than in boys;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in frequency or severity of chronic pain; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No incidence hyponatremia post-TBI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fewer cerebral micro-bleeds post- concussion in women hockey players”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Additionally, race may interact with sex to influence TBI outcomes, with a study of nearly 3000 patients with mild to severe TBI finding higher incidence of brain edema in women sampled in Hong Kong but not those in Australia. 30”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] 30. Yeung, J.H., Mikocka-Walus, A.A., Cameron, P.A., Poon, W.S., Ho, H.F., Chang, A., Graham, C.A., and Rainer, T.H. (2011). Protection from traumatic brain injury in hormonally active women vs. men of a similar age: a retrospective international study. Arch. Surg. 146, 436-442.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in insomnia prevalence or severity 3 months post-TBI;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in serum of oxidative stress trauma”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in mortality or GOS at discharge.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in unemployment rate between men and women veterans;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No sex difference in diffuse axonal injury, brain edema, hypoxia, ICP, contusional bleeding;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in duration of symptoms, or SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“sex differences in lesions on CT scans”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in mortality, injury severity, or incidence of acute complications post-TBI; SB, S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These differences could be attributed to race-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes affecting inflammation and predisposition to genetic diseases. 31,32”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] 31. Huang, T., Shu, Y., and Cai, Y.D. (2015). Genetic differences among ethnic groups. BMC Genomics 16, 1093.
- Not checked yetcites [32] 32. Van Dyke, A.L., Cote, M.L., Wenzlaff, A.S., Land, S., and Schwartz, A.G. (2009). Cytokine SNPs: comparison of allele frequencies by race and implications for future studies. Cytokine 46, 236-244.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in number of post-concussive symptoms, neurocognitive scores or depression up to 2 weeks post-injury; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in concussion symptom reporting or cognition in hockey players 6 months post-injury; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lower rates fogginess, memory impairment, and concentration problems”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lower mortalityin girls; S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in mild depression 1-year post-injury; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Shorter hospital stay and better attention, working memory, and language skills 1 year post-TBI in women;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No motor outcomes or perceived life satisfaction; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better executive function in women due to greater self-awareness related deficits; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in visuo-spatial abilities; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in postural control and balance post-TBI; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in cognition or symptoms in soccer players 6 months post- TBI; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher fractional anisotropy (indicative of white matter integrity) in women”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in symptom reporting in women.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in neuropsychological performance 2 post-TBI;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in neurocognitive ability or number of symptoms in high school soccer players; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Less physical aggression in women veterans”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but no differences depression; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better visual memory in men athletes;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in injury severity, GOS, or length of stay in rehabilitation;”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Better post-concussion performance in women; SB”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No difference in balance and postural stability; CI”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences in length of hospital stay, GOS-E, or functional independence 3.5 years post-TBI; CI, S”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, severe CCI did not show significant difference in time-course of neurodegeneration or in overall tissue damage between males and females. 43”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] 43. Hall, E.D., Gibson, T.R., and Pavel, K.M. (2005). Lack of a gender difference in post-traumatic neurodegeneration in the mouse controlled cortical impact injury model. J. Neurotrauma 22, 669-679.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Animal studies offer the ability to control many experimental variables, to study cellular and molecular mechanisms, and to directly test the link between mechanisms and functional outcomes.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For instance, cell death following brain injury is triggered by caspase activation in females but by caspase-independent mechanisms in males. 9”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] 9. Demarest, T.G., and McCarthy, M.M. (2015). Sex differences in mitochondrial (dys)function: implications for neuroprotection. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 47, 173-188.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Normally cycling females had significantly better survival rates, blood-brain barrier integrity, improved cortical blood flow, fewer sensorimotor deficits, less brain edema, and smaller contusion volumes than age-matched males after TBI. 11,60-62”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] 11. Roof, R.L., Duvdevani, R., and Stein, D.G. (1993). Gender influences outcome of brain injury: progesterone plays a protective role. Brain Res. 607, 333-336.
- Not checked yetcites [60] 60. Roof, R.L., and Hall, E.D. (2000). Estrogen-related gender difference in survival rate and cortical blood flow after impact-acceleration head injury in rats. J. Neurotrauma 17, 1155-1169.
- Not checked yetcites [61] 61. Bramlett, H.M., and Dietrich, W.D. (2001). Neuropathological protection after traumatic brain injury in intact female rats versus males or ovariectomized females. J. Neurotrauma 18, 891-900.
- Not checked yetcites [62] 62. Clevenger, A.C., Kim, H., Salcedo, E., Yonchek, J.C., Rodgers, K.M., Orfila, J.E., Dietz, R.M., Quillinan, N., Traystman, R.J., and Herson, P.S. (2018). Endogenous sex steroids dampen neuroinflammation and improve outcome of traumatic brain injury in mice. J. Mol. Neurosci. 64, 410-420.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, female rats in the proestrous phase of their cycles had less brain edema and lower intracranial pressure after TBI compared with non-proestrous females presumably due to elevated serum levels of estrogen and progesterone. 64”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] 64. Maghool, F., Khaksari, M., and Siahposht Khachki, A. (2013). Differences in brain edema and intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury across the estrous cycle: involvement of female sex steroid hormones. Brain Res. 1497, 61-72.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering the current body of research on sex differences in TBI, the overall picture is not a straightforward one that points to better outcomes in one sex versus the other. Rather, the findings we have reviewed from human and animal studies are complicated and often contradictory.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted above, human studies more commonly report functional outcomes after TBI, whereas animal studies more frequently report measures related to cellular or molecular mechanism.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such symptoms are usually self-reported and may be influenced by societal gender stereotypes resulting in men reporting symptoms differently from women. 53,54”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] 53. Maclean, A., Sweeting, H., and Hunt, K. (2010). 'Rules' for boys, 'guidelines' for girls: gender differences in symptom reporting during childhood and adolescence. Soc. Sci. Med. 70, 597-604.
- Not checked yetcites [54] 54. Wallace, J., Covassin, T., and Beidler, E. (2017). Sex differences in high school athletes' knowledge of sport-related concussion symptoms and reporting behaviors. J. Athl. Train. 52, 682-688.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Females performed better than males on sensorimotor tasks but not on cognitive tasks following moderate to severe CCI. 37-40”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] 37. Free, K.E., Greene, A.M., Bondi, C.O., Lajud, N., de la Tremblaye, P.B., and Kline, A.E. (2017). Comparable impediment of cognitive function in female and male rats subsequent to daily administration of haloperidol after traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 296, 62-68.
- Not checked yetcites [38] 38. Wagner, A.K., Willard, L.A., Kline, A.E., Wenger, M.K., Bolinger, B.D., Ren, D., Zafonte, R.D., and Dixon, C.E. (2004). Evaluation of estrous cycle stage and gender on behavioral outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 998, 113-121.
- Not checked yetcites [39] 39. Xu, X., Cao, S., Chao, H., Liu, Y., and Ji, J. (2016). Sex-related differences in striatal dopaminergic system after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. Bull. 124, 214-221.
- Not checked yetcites [40] 40. Xiong, Y., Mahmood, A., Lu, D., Qu, C., Goussev, A., Schallert, T., and Chopp, M. (2007). Role of gender in outcome after traumatic brain injury and therapeutic effect of erythropoietin in mice. Brain Res. 1185, 301-312.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In adolescent male mice with TBI, progesterone improved motor performance but exacerbated deficits in female mice. 66”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] 66. Mannix, R., Berglass, J., Berkner, J., Moleus, P., Qiu, J., Jantzie, L.L., Meehan, W.P., 3rd, Stanley, R.M., and Robinson, S. (2014). Sex differences in the effect of progesterone after controlled cortical impact in adolescent mice: a preliminary study. J. Neurosurg. 121, 1337-1341.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One study suggests that the better post-injury outcome in pseudopregnant females compared with both males and intact females might be due to their 50-100 times higher levels of progesterone and its metabolites at the time of injury. 63”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] 63. Meffre, D., Pianos, A., Liere, P., Eychenne, B., Cambourg, A., Schumacher, M., Stein, D.G., and Guennoun, R. (2007). Steroid profiling in brain and plasma of male and pseudopregnant female rats after traumatic brain injury: analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Endocrinology 148, 2505-2517.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Regarding timecourse, females showed less edema than males at 5 h, 3 days, and 5 days after impact acceleration injury, but more edema at 24 h post-injury. 41”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] 41. O'Connor, C.A., Cernak, I., and Vink, R. (2006). The temporal profile of edema formation differs between male and female rats following diffuse traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 96, 121-124.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In mice, dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis following blast TBI is caused by dysregulation of pre-autonomic neurons in females, but by disruption of limbic pathways in males. 58”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] 58. Russell, A.L., Richardson, M.R., Bauman, B.M., Hernandez, I.M., Saperstein, S., Handa, R.J., and Wu, T.J. (2018). Differential responses of the HPA axis to mild blast traumatic brain injury in male and female mice. Endocrinology 159, 2363-2375.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Animal models of TBI can inform the pathophysiology of human TBI.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mixed results within an animal study may also result from pre-set group sizes that are powered to detect sex differences in some assessments but might be inadequate for others.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, female mice had better ambulation and displayed less anxiety post-TBI although sex differences in brain lesion volumes were not detected. 49,51”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] 49. Tucker, L.B., Fu, A.H., and McCabe, J.T. (2016). Performance of male and female C57BL/6J mice on motor and cognitive tasks commonly used in pre-clinical traumatic brain injury research. J. Neurotrauma 33, 880-894.
- Not checked yetcites [51] 51. Tucker, L.B., Burke, J.F., Fu, A.H., and McCabe, J.T. (2017). Neuropsychiatric symptom modeling in male and female C57BL/6J mice after experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 34, 890-905.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In pseudo-pregnant rats, post-TBI cerebral edema was even lower than in normally cycling females, suggesting that female sex hormones may exert a dose-dependent neuroprotective response. 11”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] 11. Roof, R.L., Duvdevani, R., and Stein, D.G. (1993). Gender influences outcome of brain injury: progesterone plays a protective role. Brain Res. 607, 333-336.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conversely, sex-dependent neuroprotective effects were extinguished in ovariectomized females with low levels of circulating estrogen and progesterone, but rescued by exogenous treatment with these hormones. 11,60,61”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] 11. Roof, R.L., Duvdevani, R., and Stein, D.G. (1993). Gender influences outcome of brain injury: progesterone plays a protective role. Brain Res. 607, 333-336.
- Not checked yetcites [60] 60. Roof, R.L., and Hall, E.D. (2000). Estrogen-related gender difference in survival rate and cortical blood flow after impact-acceleration head injury in rats. J. Neurotrauma 17, 1155-1169.
- Not checked yetcites [61] 61. Bramlett, H.M., and Dietrich, W.D. (2001). Neuropathological protection after traumatic brain injury in intact female rats versus males or ovariectomized females. J. Neurotrauma 18, 891-900.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the ultrastructural level, axons of cultured neurons isolated from females were consistently smaller and contained fewer microtubules than those from males.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] 102. Dolle, J.P., Jaye, A., Anderson, S.A., Ahmadzadeh, H., Shenoy, V.B., and Smith, D.H. (2018). Newfound sex differences in axonal structure underlie differential outcomes from in vitro traumatic axonal injury. Exp. Neurol. 300, 121-134.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, chronically treating mice with an androgenic-anabolic steroid cocktail containing testosterone prior to induction of repeated, mild TBI exacerbated TBI-mediated axonal injury and white matter microgliosis but not behavioral deficits. 85”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] 85. Namjoshi, D.R., Cheng, W.H., Carr, M., Martens, K.M., Zareyan, S., Wilkinson, A., McInnes, K.A., Cripton, P.A., and Wellington, C.L. (2016). Chronic exposure to androgenic-anabolic steroids exacerbates axonal injury and microgliosis in the CHIMERA mouse model of repetitive concussion. PLoS One 11, e0146540.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Further, age interacted with sex leading to better verbal abilities in women than men in their twenties but slower processing speed in women than men in their forties. 110”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] 110. Eramudugolla, R., Bielak, A.A., Bunce, D., Easteal, S., Cherbuin, N., and Anstey, K.J. (2014). Long-term cognitive correlates of traumatic brain injury across adulthood and interactions with APOE genotype, sex, and age cohorts. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 20, 444-454.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These studies, which show within a given population sample that males fare better on some outcome measures and females better on others, encourage us to think about sex effects in TBI beyond a single dimension.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the selection of outcome measures clearly matters and can affect conclusions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, because testosterone is converted to estradiol by aromatase, there is a possibility that the observed effects are at least partly conferred by its estrogenic metabolite.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although many studies have focused on the hormonal basis of sex differences in TBI, chromosomal differences remain underexplored.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, although women veterans were less likely to be diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder following TBI, they were more likely to suffer from depression or anxiety. 8”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] 8. Iverson, K.M., Hendricks, A.M., Kimerling, R., Krengel, M., Meterko, M., Stolzmann, K.L., Baker, E., Pogoda, T.K., Vasterling, J.J., and Lew, H.L. (2011). Psychiatric diagnoses and neurobehavioral symptom severity among OEF/OIF VA patients with deploymentrelated traumatic brain injury: a gender comparison. Women Health Iss. 21, S210-S217.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Post-TBI symptoms differed between sexes with women reporting more headaches, dizziness, and drowsiness and men reporting more amnesia and confusion. 100,109”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] 100. Frommer, L.J., Gurka, K.K., Cross, K.M., Ingersoll, C.D., Comstock, R.D., and Saliba, S.A. (2011). Sex differences in concussion symptoms of high school athletes. J. Athl. Train. 46, 76-84.
- Not checked yetcites [109] 109. Colantonio, A., Harris, J.E., Ratcliff, G., Chase, S., and Ellis, K. (2010). Gender differences in self reported long term outcomes following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurol. 10, 102.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Behavioral studies in the same rats also found increased depression-like behaviors in females and working memory deficits in males. 45”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] 45. Wright, D.K., O'Brien, T.J., Shultz, S.R., and Mychasiuk, R. (2017). Sex matters: repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in adolescent rats. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 4, 640-654.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“High-resolution MRI in these mice found that sex differences in the volumes of certain brain regions were influenced exclusively by gonadal hormones, whereas differences in others were exclusively under chromosomal control.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] 92. Corre, C., Friedel, M., Vousden, D.A., Metcalf, A., Spring, S., Qiu, L.R., Lerch, J.P., and Palmert, M.R. (2016). Separate effects of sex hormones and sex chromosomes on brain structure and function revealed by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and spatial navigation assessment of the Four Core Genotype mouse model. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 997-1016.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, female mice had fewer deficits in social recognition, but increased sociosexual avoidance compared with males following CCI, 51 and also showed greater ambulation but more severely depleted striatal dopamine compared with males. 39”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] 51. Tucker, L.B., Burke, J.F., Fu, A.H., and McCabe, J.T. (2017). Neuropsychiatric symptom modeling in male and female C57BL/6J mice after experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 34, 890-905.
- Not checked yetcites [39] 39. Xu, X., Cao, S., Chao, H., Liu, Y., and Ji, J. (2016). Sex-related differences in striatal dopaminergic system after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. Bull. 124, 214-221.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Testosterone promotes neurogenesis in uninjured male rats 82 and neuronal survival in male and female rats following axonal injury. 83,84”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] 82. Spritzer, M.D., and Galea, L.A. (2007). Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, but not estradiol, enhance survival of new hippocampal neurons in adult male rats. Dev. Neurobiol. 67, 13211333.
- Not checked yetcites [83] 83. Yu, W.H. (1989). Administration of testosterone attenuates neuronal loss following axotomy in the brain-stem motor nuclei of female rats. J. Neurosci. 9, 3908-3914.
- Not checked yetcites [84] 84. Tehranipour, M., and Moghimi, A. (2010). Neuroprotective effects of testosterone on regenerating spinal cord motoneurons in rats. J. Mot. Behav. 42, 151-155.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The effect of sex hormones on neurogenesis and spine density has also been studied, 103-105 and could modulate synaptic plasticity during recovery from TBI.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] 103. Galea, L.A., Spritzer, M.D., Barker, J.M., and Pawluski, J.L. (2006). Gonadal hormone modulation of hippocampal neurogenesis in the adult. Hippocampus 16, 225-232.
- Not checked yetcites [104] 104. Keil, K.P., Sethi, S., Wilson, M.D., Chen, H., and Lein, P.J. (2017). In vivo and in vitro sex differences in the dendritic morphology of developing murine hippocampal and cortical neurons. Sci. Rep. 7, 8486.
- Not checked yetcites [105] 105. Shors, T.J., Chua, C., and Falduto, J. (2001). Sex differences and opposite effects of stress on dendritic spine density in the male versus female hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 21, 6292-6297. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given the importance of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex for stress responses and mood, 97-99 it is possible that anatomical differences in these regions may contribute to post-TBI symptoms, as women report greater anxiety and depression and men report more amnesia and confusion. 8,100,101”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] 97. Bangasser, D.A., and Valentino, R.J. (2014). Sex differences in stress-related psychiatric disorders: neurobiological perspectives. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 35, 303-319. source
- Not checked yetcites [98] 98. Gobinath, A.R., Mahmoud, R., and Galea, L.A. (2014). Influence of sex and stress exposure across the lifespan on endophenotypes of depression: focus on behavior, glucocorticoids, and hippocampus. Front. Neurosci. 8, 420.
- Not checked yetcites [99] 99. McEwen, B.S. (2010). Stress, sex, and neural adaptation to a changing environment: mechanisms of neuronal remodeling. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1204 Suppl., E38-E59.
- Not checked yetcites [8] 8. Iverson, K.M., Hendricks, A.M., Kimerling, R., Krengel, M., Meterko, M., Stolzmann, K.L., Baker, E., Pogoda, T.K., Vasterling, J.J., and Lew, H.L. (2011). Psychiatric diagnoses and neurobehavioral symptom severity among OEF/OIF VA patients with deploymentrelated traumatic brain injury: a gender comparison. Women Health Iss. 21, S210-S217.
- Not checked yetcites [100] 100. Frommer, L.J., Gurka, K.K., Cross, K.M., Ingersoll, C.D., Comstock, R.D., and Saliba, S.A. (2011). Sex differences in concussion symptoms of high school athletes. J. Athl. Train. 46, 76-84.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Accordingly, sex differences in cerebellar and pre-central gray matter volumes were associated with X-chromosome load, whereas sex differences in the amygdala, parahippocampus, and occipital cortex were linked to testosterone levels. 96”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] 96. Lentini, E., Kasahara, M., Arver, S., and Savic, I. (2013). Sex differences in the human brain and the impact of sex chromosomes and sex hormones. Cereb. Cortex 23, 2322-2336.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“neuroprotective effects of testosterone including inhibition of apoptosis, reduction in oxidative stress, improved mitochondrial respiration, and maintenance of mitochondrial membrane potential have also been reported.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] 144. Chisu, V., Manca, P., Lepore, G., Gadau, S., Zedda, M., and Farina, V. (2006). Testosterone induces neuroprotection from oxidative stress. Effects on catalase activity and 3-nitro-L-tyrosine incorporation into alpha-tubulin in a mouse neuroblastoma cell line. Arch. Ital. Biol. 144, 63-73.
- Not checked yetcites [145] 145. Fanaei, H., Karimian, S.M., Sadeghipour, H.R., Hassanzade, G., Kasaeian, A., Attari, F., Khayat, S., Ramezani, V., and Javadimehr, M. (2014). Testosterone enhances functional recovery after stroke through promotion of antioxidant defenses, BDNF levels and neurogenesis in male rats. Brain Res. 1558, 74-83.
- Not checked yetcites [146] 146. Toro-Urrego, N., Garcia-Segura, L.M., Echeverria, V., and Barreto, G.E. (2016). Testosterone protects mitochondrial function and regulates neuroglobin expression in astrocytic cells exposed to glucose deprivation. Front. Aging Neurosci. 8, 152.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“during high-stress conditions males preferentially rely on carbohydrates and amino acids as a fuel source for energy production, whereas females use fats.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] 116. Manole, M.D., Tehranian-DePasquale, R., Du, L., Bayir, H., Kochanek, P.M., and Clark, R.S. (2011). Unmasking sex-based disparity in neuronal metabolism. Curr. Pharm. Des. 17, 3854-3860.
- Not checked yetcites [126] 126. Widdowson, E.M. (1976). The response of the sexes to nutritional stress. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 175-180.
- Not checked yetcites [127] 127. Lamont, L.S. (2005). Gender differences in amino acid use during endurance exercise. Nutr. Rev. 63, 419-422.
- Not checked yetcites [128] 128. Du, L., Hickey, R.W., Bayir, H., Watkins, S.C., Tyurin, V.A., Guo, F., Kochanek, P.M., Jenkins, L.W., Ren, J., Gibson, G., Chu, C.T., Kagan, V.E., and Clark, R.S. (2009). Starving neurons show sex difference in autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 2383-2396.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mitochondria are crucial to energy production, as well as calcium homeostasis, free radical production, neurotransmitter synthesis, and apoptosis in neurons and glia.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [115] 115. Mattson, M.P., Gleichmann, M., and Cheng, A. (2008). Mitochondria in neuroplasticity and neurological disorders. Neuron 60, 748-766. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A useful framework for understanding sex differences in TBI may be a ''mosaic'' model in which distinct anatomical/functional domains may each respond differently to injury in males versus females.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Cellular stressors such as nutrient deprivation may elicit a differential response in mitochondria from males and females resulting in decreased mitochondrial respiration, increased autophagy, and enhanced neuronal death in male rats.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] 128. Du, L., Hickey, R.W., Bayir, H., Watkins, S.C., Tyurin, V.A., Guo, F., Kochanek, P.M., Jenkins, L.W., Ren, J., Gibson, G., Chu, C.T., Kagan, V.E., and Clark, R.S. (2009). Starving neurons show sex difference in autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 2383-2396.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“brain mitochondria of female rodents had lower oxidative stress than those from males associated with greater expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] 119. Gaignard, P., Savouroux, S., Liere, P., Pianos, A., Therond, P., Schumacher, M., Slama, A., and Guennoun, R. (2015). Effect of sex differences on brain mitochondrial function and its suppression by ovariectomy and in aged mice. Endocrinology 156, 2893-2904.
- Not checked yetcites [124] 124. Borras, C., Sastre, J., Garcia-Sala, D., Lloret, A., Pallardo, F.V., and Vina, J. (2003). Mitochondria from females exhibit higher antioxidant gene expression and lower oxidative damage than males. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 34, 546-552. source
- Not checked yetcites [125] 125. Pinto, R.E., and Bartley, W. (1969). The effect of age and sex on glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase activities and on aerobic glutathione oxidation in rat liver homogenates. Biochem. J112, 109-115.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although studies relying on a single outcome measure might be useful for gross outcomes such as mortality and are easier to interpret, they do not fully represent the anatomical and physiological complexity of sex effects in TBI.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“fission facilitates transport of mitochondria to regions of high energy demand and removal of damaged mitochondria by autophagy.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [132] 132. Bereiter-Hahn, J., and Voth, M. (1994). Dynamics of mitochondria in living cells: shape changes, dislocations, fusion, and fission of mitochondria. Microsc. Res. Tech. 27, 198-219.
- Not checked yetcites [133] 133. Chan, D.C. (2006). Mitochondrial fusion and fission in mammals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 79-99. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such a model can account for mixed results, and highlights the benefits of study design that includes multiple outcome measurements. 48,111”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] 48. McCarthy, M.M., Arnold, A.P., Ball, G.F., Blaustein, J.D., and De Vries, G.J. (2012). Sex differences in the brain: the not so inconvenient truth. J. Neurosci. 32, 2241-2247. source
- Not checked yetcites [111] 111. Joel, D., and Fausto-Sterling, A. (2016). Beyond sex differences: new approaches for thinking about variation in brain structure and function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 371, 20150451.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Progesterone treatment reversed TBI-mediated impairment in mitochondrial respiration and neuron loss in ovariectomized adult females”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] 65. Robertson, C.L., and Saraswati, M. (2015). Progesterone protects mitochondrial function in a rat model of pediatric traumatic brain injury. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 47, 43-51.
- Not checked yetcites [143] 143. Robertson, C.L., Puskar, A., Hoffman, G.E., Murphy, A.Z., Saraswati, M., and Fiskum, G. (2006). Physiologic progesterone reduces mitochondrial dysfunction and hippocampal cell loss after traumatic brain injury in female rats. Exp. Neurol. 197, 235-243.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which may have different prevalence in women and men”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Injury severity, genetic factors, and age may interact with biological sex to determine TBI outcomes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sex differences in mitochondrial function and dynamics may be important sources of sex differences in TBI.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because larger sample size affords greater statistical power and might better represent the general population”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“such under-representation likely has a negative impact on clinical care and limits successful drug development.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Disease etiology, underlying neuropathology, and cellular mechanisms of recovery differ between sexes.
The paper relies on this without support.
Across the scientific literature, the terms sex and gender are often used interchangeably.
“However, across the scientific literature the terms sex and gender are often used interchangeably.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Animal models of TBI can inform the pathophysiology of human TBI.
“Because therapeutic interventions are targeted toward underlying mechanisms, elucidating the role of sex in TBI pathophysiology is crucial.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The studies included in the review are representative of the literature on sex differences in TBI.
“All animal studies identified by our search criteria were classified based on post-TBI outcomes (upper panel).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Disease etiology, underlying neuropathology, and cellular mechanisms of recovery differ between sexes.
“Because disease etiology, underlying neuropathology, and cellular mechanisms of recovery differ between sexes”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reviewed human and animal studies are sufficiently representative to support conclusions about sex differences in TBI outcomes.
“This review of the literature in humans and animal models suggests that sex differences in TBI outcomes are likely”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Following mTBI, women tend to experience more symptoms and take significantly longer to recover compared to men for reasons currently unknown [28, 51, 67, 114].”
From DNA repair deficiency and senescence in concussed professional athletes involved in contact sports (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting percentages for mixed results in animal studies
MajorThe results section says 14% of animal studies had mixed results and 28% found no sex differences. The discussion instead assigns 28% to mixed results, doubling the stated fraction behind its discussion of mixed findings.
“with the remaining studies showing no sex differences (28%) or mixed results (14%; Fig. 4, top).”
“Figures 2 and 4 indicate that 9% of human studies and 28% of animal studies yielded mixed results per our definition.”
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Toro-Urrego, N., García‐Segura, L. M., Echeverrı́a, V., & Barreto, G. E. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00152 · Cited by 65
RetractedGene Action in the X-chromosome of the Mouse (Mus musculus L.)
LYON, M. F. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/190372a0 · Cited by 3,978
X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females
Carrel, L., & Willard, H. F. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03479 · Cited by 2,097
Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies
Clayton, J. A., & Collins, F. S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/509282a · Cited by 1,816
Animal models of traumatic brain injury
Xiong, Y., Mahmood, A., & Chopp, M. (2013) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3407 · Cited by 1,456
Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Soldin, O. P., & Mattison, D. R. (2009) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200948030-00001 · Cited by 1,163
Mitochondria in neuroplasticity and neurological disorders
Mattson, M. P., Gleichmann, M., & Cheng, A. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.010 · Cited by 1,081
Mitochondrial Fusion and Fission in Mammals
Chan, D. C. (2006) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104638 · Cited by 972
Bereiter‐Hahn, J., & Vöth, M. (1994) · Microscopy Research and Technique · doi:10.1002/jemt.1070270303 · Cited by 900
Zemek, R., Barrowman, N., Freedman, S. B., Gravel, J., Gagnon, I., McGahern, C., Aglipay, M., Sangha, G., Boutis, K., Beer, D., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1203 · Cited by 900
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 298 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Taylor A.N., , Tio D.L., , Paydar A., , and Sutton R.L. (2017). Sex differences in thermal, stress and inflammatory responses to minocycline administration in rats with traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 35, 630–638.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–541 of 541
Andersson, M. J., Goeckner, B. D., España, L. Y., Mayer, A. R., Brett, B. L., & Meier, T. B. (2026) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70584
Prevalence of Concussion in the Admitted Trauma Patients Using Systematic Screening
Broughton-Miller, K. D., Goshorn, K., Fox, J., Frisbie, M., Blevins, D., Zanaglio, B., Barker, W., Smith, D., Hegazi, S., Hartman, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Trauma Nursing · doi:10.1097/jtn.0000000000000927
Zimomra, Z., Lepak, C., Boland, R., Taylor, M., McCraw, A., Schreiber, H. L., Crescenze, I. M., McTigue, D. M., & Kokiko‐Cochran, O. N. (2026) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1177/08977151261458600
Review of Medications That Reduce Neurological Deficits in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.
Qahtani, S. S. A. J. A., Almuzaini, S. K., Alsheri, K. M., Alosaimi, R., Alarawi, M. M., Alshehri, A. S., & Abdulwahab, A. (2026) · Clinical neuropharmacology · doi:10.1097/wnf.0000000000000689
Sex Differences in Memory Performance after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
Robson, I. K., Rabelo, T. K., Almeida-Souza, T. H., McCann, E., Nestor, S. M., Goubran, M., Lipsman, N., & Hamani, C. (2026) · Neurotrauma Reports · doi:10.1177/2689288x261461855
Avitabile, A., Rusciano, D., Amato, R., Cannizzaro, L., & Gagliano, C. (2026) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15141176
Burke, S. J., Galvin, D. M., Nolan, Y. M., Schellekens, H., & Henry, R. J. (2026) · Neurotrauma Reports · doi:10.1177/2689288x261456994
Enhanced Recovery Protocol Post‐TBI (ERA‐TBI): Factors Determining Morbidity and Mortality
O’Byrne, G.-P., Sankar, S., Sharma, S., Beniameen, D., Ramachandran, A., & Raziq, S. A. (2026) · Neurology Research International · doi:10.1155/nri/8974212
de Lima, A. L. S., Bocca, L. F., Rodrigues, R. B., Rodrigues, T. P., da Silva, C. C., dos Santos, E. R., & Centeno, R. S. (2026) · Surgical Neurology International · doi:10.25259/sni_50_2026
Leitão, R. A., Alves, J. L., Bernardo, A. L., Mota‐Pinto, A., & Silva, A. P. (2026) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2026.106952
León‐Rodríguez, A., Wangler, L. M., Goodman, E., Packer, J. M., Davis, A., Sheridan, J. F., Grondona, J. M., Godbout, J. P., & López-Ávalos, M. D. (2026) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2026.106963
Nguyen, C., Steinberg, O., Scandiffio, J., Lewczuk, M., Matheson, F. I., Colantonio, A., & Chan, V. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118951
Gupta, N., Sheffield, K. N., Khanmirzaei, M., Grant, A. C., Guptarak, J., Bolding, I. J., Johnson, K. M., Esenaliev, R. O., Prough, D. S., & Micci, M. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27167505
España‐Irla, G., Perko, M. J., Tinney, E. M., Nwakamma, M. C., Anto‐Ocrah, M., & Morris, T. P. (2026) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1002/ejsc.70248
Ahmed, I., LaBalle, M. H., Taber, M. F., Sneed, S. E., West, F. D., Kaiser, E. E., & Zhao, Q. C. (2026) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2026.116005
Wang, X., Pang, H., Chopp, M., Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, Z. G., Zhang, L., & Xiong, Y. (2026) · Neurotrauma Reports · doi:10.1177/2689288x261480487
Habib, M., Wojciechowski, A. M., Grabowski, D. C., Normand, S. T., Hsu, J., Zafar, S. F., & Moura, L. M. V. R. (2026) · Neurotrauma Reports · doi:10.1177/2689288x261478748
Molfino, A., Martellucci, O., Genco, M., Iannazzo, F., & Muscaritoli, M. (2026) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2026.113425
Ranaldi, E. D. L. R. M. C., Johnson, N. H., Sawaya, A. P., Herrera, J. R., Kerr, N. A., Bramlett, H. M., Keane, R. W., Dietrich, W. D., & Vaccari, J. P. D. R. (2026) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells15181658
Mulayi, S. C., Aaronson, A., Goostrey, K. J., Tuz‐Zahra, F., Tripodis, Y., Cole‐French, W. S., Roebuck, M., Schneider, G., Pine, B. N., Palmisano, J. N., et al. (2026) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci16090974
Robson, I. K., Rabelo, T. K., Almeida-Souza, T. H., McCann, E., Bittencourt, G. N., Surendrakumar, S., Nestor, S. M., Goubran, M., Covolan, L., Soto‐Montenegro, M. L., et al. (2026) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2026.116033
Raičević, M., & Nikolovski, S. S. (2026) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci16090998
Connectome reorganization and precision neurorehabilitation after traumatic brain injury
Mancera, J. R., Ramos-Márquez, A., Estupiñan-Pepinosa, D. F., González, L., Zorro, Ó., Gómez-Amarillo, D. F., Ramón, J. F., Quintero-Rueda, D., Hakim, F., Patiño-Gómez, J. G., et al. (2026) · Brain Network Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.bnd.2026.08.002
Phan, D., Yao, Y., Shaikh, U., Ahmad, N., & Mollayeva, T. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.10.02.26364454
Abdi, H., Sánchez‐Molina, D., Vilana, S. G., Azizi, S., Rahimi-Movaghar, V., & Haghighi, M. (2026) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2026.150580
Zhang, L., Hu, W., 何文杰, Huang, F., & Zhang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1926632
Garcia, G. S. P., Perez, G. M., Gasperi, R. D., Sosa, M. A., Zhu, C. W., Yeung, S., Khalique, S., Toro, C. A., Hof, P. R., & Elder, G. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1830745
Liu, B., Xie, F., Dong, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Zhao, Y., Wang, X., Sun, Z., 章圣辉, jing, J., et al. (2026) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15191788
Hiebert, N., Bell, J., Cavanagh, S. J., & Drake, C. (2026) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2026.2736703
Nwakamma, M. C., Tinney, E. M., Perko, M. J., España‐Irla, G., Kong, L. L., Chen, C., Hwang, J., O'Brien, A., Sodemann, R. L., Caefer, J., et al. (2026) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/09226028261496160
Sex differences in neuroplasticity and functional recovery after neurosurgical interventions
Yusupov, F. A., & Abdykadyrov, M. (2026) · Burdenko s Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.17116/neiro202690051113
Haddock, M. L., Krishna, G., Yuen, K. C. J., & Thomas, T. C. (2026) · Growth Hormone & IGF Research · doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2026.101729
Sharratt, C. A., Hall, J. L., Crack, P. J., & Tan, H. X. (2026) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph19101659
Neuro-Metabolic and Vascular Dysregulation are Functional Biomarkers of Acquired Brain InjuryPreprint
Chie, J. A. K. C., Persohn, S. A., Jullienne, A., Yan, J., Bright, M., Obenaus, A., & Territo, P. R. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.21.760721
Zigmond, J. W., Lamberty, B. G., Simon, G. J., Wood, J. M., Elliott, N. M., Miller, D. W., & Stauch, K. L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.21.760461
Hippocampal transcriptomic response to experimental traumatic brain injury in male and female mice
Zima, L. A., Liu, Y., Hood, K. N., Robinson, D., Moore, A., & Redell, J. B. (2026) · Neurotrauma Reports · doi:10.1177/2689288x261495796
Traumatismo cranioencefálico leve: fatores associados ao desfecho funcional
Pereira, M. S. D. C., Melo, M. C. N., & Andrade, L. D. O. (2026) · Acta Fisiátrica · doi:10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v33e239275
Reilly, N., Prebor, J., Moxey, J. R., & Schussler, E. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-78672-2
Chen, B., Tu, D., Zhang, R., Nie, C., Shi, Q., Jiang, C.-T., Sun, F., Pu, X., Zhang, L., Zhou, Q., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1987328
Oculomotor rehabilitation after concussion in adults (ORCA): a feasibility study
Biscardi, M., Bayley, M. T., Thorpe, K., Quaid, P., Colantonio, A., & Mollayeva, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1898653
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupte, R. P., Brooks, W. M., Vukas, R. R., Pierce, J. D., & Harris, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Janna L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3063-3091
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- PMC
- PMC6818488
- OpenAlex
- W2915478013
- Semantic Scholar
- df6dea32c0f453621f674193fcab8f821850d6d1
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 298
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 31.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002366)
- National Institute on Aging (R21AG058052, P30AG035982, P30AG072973)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS091920)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, sex differences, women in clinical trials, injury severity, mitochondrial function, sex as a biological variable, sex differences in recovery, translational research
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review