Cited by 63Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Therapy in virtual environments--clinical and ethical issues

Yellowlees, Peter M., Holloway, Kevin M., Parish, Michelle Burke·2012·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As virtual reality and computer-assisted therapy strategies are increasingly implemented for the treatment of psychological disorders, ethical standards and guidelines must be considered. This study determined a set of ethical and legal guidelines for treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)/traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a virtual environment incorporating the rights of an individual who is represented by an avatar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken. An example of a case study of therapy in Second Life (a popular online virtual world developed by Linden Labs) was described. RESULTS: Ethical and legal considerations regarding psychiatric treatment of PTSD/TBI in a virtual environment were examined. The following issues were described and discussed: authentication of providers and patients, informed consent, patient confidentiality, patient well-being, clinician competence (licensing and credentialing), training of providers, insurance for providers, the therapeutic environment, and emergencies. Ethical and legal guidelines relevant to these issues in a virtual environment were proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Ethical and legal issues in virtual environments are similar to those that occur in the in-person world. Individuals represented by an avatar have the rights equivalent to the individual and should be treated as such.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2011.0195

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VR technology allows for the electronic collection of vast amounts of data.

    “Given that VR technology allows for the electronic collection of vast amounts of data, caution regarding the specifics of the hardware and software is warranted, especially in the context of third-party applications, on-line data collection, data storage and protection against potential manipulation (Marloth et al., 2020; Yellowlees et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yellowlees, P. M., Holloway, K. M., & Parish, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California System (US)
  • National Center for Telehealth and Technology
Corresponding author
Yellowlees, Peter M.
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2012-09
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
558-564
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2036411149
Cited by
63
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
virtual reality therapy, computer-assisted therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, moral norms, legal issues, informed consent, patient confidentiality, Second Life, virtual worlds
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Clinical Competence, Confidentiality, Humans, Informed Consent, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review