The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EHBP-1 Functions with RAB-10 during Endocytic Recycling in Caenorhabditis elegans
Abstract
Caenorhabditis elegans RAB-10 functions in endocytic recycling in polarized cells, regulating basolateral cargo transport in the intestinal epithelia and postsynaptic cargo transport in interneurons. A similar role was found for mammalian Rab10 in MDCK cells, suggesting that a conserved mechanism regulates these related pathways in metazoans. In a yeast two-hybrid screen for binding partners of RAB-10 we identified EHBP-1, a calponin homology domain (CH) protein, whose mammalian homolog Ehbp1 was previously shown to function during endocytic transport of GLUT4 in adipocytes. In vivo we find that EHBP-1-GFP colocalizes with RFP-RAB-10 on endosomal structures of the intestine and interneurons and that ehbp-1 loss-of-function mutants share with rab-10 mutants specific endosome morphology and cargo localization defects. We also show that loss of EHBP-1 disrupts transport of membrane proteins to the plasma membrane of the nonpolarized germline cells, a defect that can be phenocopied by codepletion of RAB-10 and its closest paralog RAB-8. These results indicate that RAB-10 and EHBP-1 function together in many cell types and suggests that there are differences in the level of redundancy among Rab family members in polarized versus nonpolarized cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activation of RAB10 is heavily implicated in general endosomal cargo recycling.
“Activation of RAB10 is heavily implicated in general endosomal cargo recycling85–93”
From Mapping of endosomal proximity proteomes reveals Retromer as a hub for RAB GTPase regulation (2025) · cites this paper as [86]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic
Stenmark, H. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2728 · Cited by 3,413
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- Allaire P. D., 2010, Mol. Cell, 37, 370, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.037 · DOI · Paper page
- Ang A. L., 2003, J. Cell Biol, 163, 339, 10.1083/jcb.200307046 · DOI
- Ang A. L., 2004, J. Cell Biol, 167, 531, 10.1083/jcb.200408165 · DOI
- Audhya A., 2007, J. Cell Biol, 178, 43, 10.1083/jcb.200701139 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e05-08-0799 · DOI · Paper page
- Balklava Z., 2007, Nat. Cell Biol, 9, 1066, 10.1038/ncb1627 · DOI
- Brenner S., 1974, Genetics, 77, 71, 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71 · DOI
- Brown P. S., 2000, Traffic, 1, 124, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010205.x · DOI
- Burbea M., 2002, Neuron, 35, 107, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00749-3 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.10.1.47 · DOI
- Cheeseman I. M., 2004, Genes Dev, 18, 2255, 10.1101/gad.1234104 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e05-08-0787 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.e07-11-1120 · DOI · Paper page
- Clokey G. V., 1986, Mech. Ageing Dev, 35, 79, 10.1016/0047-6374(86)90068-0 · DOI
- Daumke O., 2007, Nature, 449, 923, 10.1038/nature06173 · DOI · Paper page
- Fares H., 2001, Genetics, 159, 133, 10.1093/genetics/159.1.133 · DOI
- Gesbert F., 2004, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol, 286, 119
- 10.1091/mbc.e07-05-0486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.10.12.4311 · DOI
- Grant B. D., 2008, Traffic, 9, 2043, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00834.x · DOI · Paper page
- Grant B. D., 2009, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 10, 597, 10.1038/nrm2755 · DOI · Paper page
- Grosshans B. L., 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 11821, 10.1073/pnas.0601617103 · DOI · Paper page
- Guilherme A., 2004, J. Biol. Chem, 279, 10593, 10.1074/jbc.M307702200 · DOI · Paper page
- Guilherme A., 2004, J. Biol. Chem, 279, 40062, 10.1074/jbc.M401918200 · DOI · Paper page
- Hart A. C., 1995, Nature, 378, 82, 10.1038/378082a0 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e02-03-0143 · DOI
- Hattula K., 2006, J. Cell Sci, 119, 4866, 10.1242/jcs.03275 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e07-09-0902 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e05-01-0060 · DOI
- Kachur T. M., 2008, Dev. Biol, 314, 287, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.11.028 · DOI
- Kamath R. S., 2003, Methods, 30, 313, 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00050-1 · DOI
- Knodler A., 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6346, 10.1073/pnas.1002401107 · DOI
- Kouranti I., 2006, Curr. Biol, 16, 1719, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.020 · DOI · Paper page
- Maricq A. V., 1995, Nature, 378, 78, 10.1038/378078a0 · DOI
- Maxfield F. R., 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 5, 121, 10.1038/nrm1315 · DOI · Paper page
- Mellem J. E., 2002, Neuron, 36, 933, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01088-7 · DOI
- Mukherjee S., 1997, Physiol. Rev, 77, 759, 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.3.759 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0733 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0466 · DOI · Paper page
- Nichols B., 2003, J. Cell Sci, 116, 4707, 10.1242/jcs.00840 · DOI
- Nonet M. L., 1998, J. Neurosci, 18, 70, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00070.1998 · DOI
- Oegema K., 2001, J. Cell Biol, 153, 1209, 10.1083/jcb.153.6.1209 · DOI
- Ortiz D., 2002, J. Cell Biol, 157, 1005, 10.1083/jcb.200201003 · DOI
- Pant S., 2009, Nat. Cell Biol, 11, 1399, 10.1038/ncb1986 · DOI · Paper page
- Park E. C., 2009, PLoS ONE, 4, e4284, 10.1371/journal.pone.0004284 · DOI
- Patton A., 2005, Curr. Biol, 15, 1045, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.057 · DOI
- Pereira-Leal J. B., 2001, J. Mol. Biol, 313, 889, 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5072 · DOI
- Powelka A. M., 2004, Traffic, 5, 20, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00150.x · DOI
- Praitis V., 2001, Genetics, 157, 1217, 10.1093/genetics/157.3.1217 · DOI
- Radhakrishna H., 1997, J. Cell Biol, 139, 49, 10.1083/jcb.139.1.49 · DOI
- Randhawa V. K., 2008, J. Biol. Chem, 283, 27208, 10.1074/jbc.M804282200 · DOI
- Rink J., 2005, Cell, 122, 735, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.043 · DOI
- Rojas R., 2007, Mol. Cell. Biol, 27, 1112, 10.1128/MCB.00156-06 · DOI
- Rongo C., 1998, Cell, 94, 751, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81734-1 · DOI
- Sano H., 2007, Cell Metab, 5, 293, 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Sato M., 2008, J. Cell Sci, 121, 3177, 10.1242/jcs.034678 · DOI
- Sato M., 2005, Nat. Cell Biol, 7, 559, 10.1038/ncb1261 · DOI
- Sato M., 2008, EMBO J, 27, 1183, 10.1038/emboj.2008.54 · DOI · Paper page
- Sato T., 2007, Nature, 448, 366, 10.1038/nature05929 · DOI
- Schuck S., 2007, Traffic, 8, 47, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00506.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.e09-06-0535 · DOI · Paper page
- Shi A., 2007, Curr. Biol, 17, 1913, 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.045 · DOI · Paper page
- Sjoblom B., 2008, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol, 18, 702, 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.10.003 · DOI
- Sonnichsen B., 2000, J. Cell Biol, 149, 901, 10.1083/jcb.149.4.901 · DOI · Paper page
- Timmons L., 1998, Nature, 395, 854, 10.1038/27579 · DOI
- van der Sluijs P., 1992, Cell, 70, 729, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90307-X · DOI
- Walseng E., 2008, J. Biol. Chem, 283, 14717, 10.1074/jbc.M801070200 · DOI
- Weide T., 2003, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 306, 79, 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00918-5 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e04-04-0342 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e07-06-0551 · DOI
- Zheng Y., 1999, Neuron, 24, 347, 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80849-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two Rab2 Interactors Regulate Dense-Core Vesicle Maturation
Ailion, M., Hannemann, M., Dalton, S., Pappas, A., Watanabe, S., Hegermann, J., Liu, Q., Han, H.-F., Gu, M., Goulding, M. Q., et al. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.017 · Cited by 86
RAB10: an Alzheimer’s disease resilience locus and potential drug target
Tavana, J., Rosene, M., Jensen, N., Ridge, P. G., Kauwe, J. S. K., & Karch, C. M. (2018) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s159148 · Cited by 62
LET-413/Erbin acts as a RAB-5 effector to promote RAB-10 activation during endocytic recycling
Liu, H., Wang, S., Hang, W., Gao, J., Zhang, W., Cheng, Z., Yang, C., He, J., Zhou, J., Chen, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201705136 · Cited by 38
Self-citationMapping of endosomal proximity proteomes reveals Retromer as a hub for RAB GTPase regulation
Antón-Plágaro, C., Chen, K.-E., Guo, Q., Liu, M., Evans, A. J., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., Wilkinson, K. A., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61802-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, A., Chen, C. C.-H., Banerjee, R., Glodowski, D., Audhya, A., Rongo, C., & Grant, B. D.
- Affiliations
- *Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry,
- Department of Genetics and the Waksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854; and
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
- Venue
- Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Published
- 2010-08-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2930-2943
- ISSN
- 1059-1524
- 1939-4586
- PMC
- PMC2921114
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review