Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy

Parkinson, John·2006
DOI 10.1093/019929111x.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This book attempts to solve two problems in deliberative democratic theory and practice: How can agreements reached inside deliberative forums be legitimate for those who did not take part? And why should people with strongly-held views participate in the first place? The solution involves rethinking deliberative theory, but also draws on lessons from practical experience with deliberative forums in Britain’s National Health Service. The book discusses the competing representation claims that different participants make, the pros and cons of different approaches to democratic accountability, and different conceptions of rationality and public reasoning. It concludes by rejecting the idea that we can have authentic, legitimate deliberation in any one forum. Instead, authentic, legitimate deliberation can only result from linkages between different kinds of institutions, drawing on different kinds of participants, at different points of a decision-making cycle. That is, it promotes a macro, society-wide view of deliberative democracy quite different from the micro, deliberative-forum view which dominates thinking on the subject in the UK. The book sketches the outline of such a deliberative system, suggesting how various institutions in civil society and elected government might link together to create public decisions, which are both more rational and more democratic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/019929111x.001.0001

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 326

  1. Abramson,, 1994, We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy
  2. Ackerman,, 1991, We the People 1: Foundations
  3. Ackerman,, 2002, Deliberation Day, Journal of Political Philosophy, 10.1111/1467-9760.00146 · DOI
  4. Almond,, 1963, The Civic Culture, 10.1515/9781400874569 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Anderson,, 1998, The Place of the Media in Popular Democracy, Critical Review, 10.1080/08913819808443513 · doi:10.1080/08913819808443513
  6. Aristotle, 1997, The Politics of Aristotle
  7. Audit, 2003, Achieving the NHS Plan: Assessment of Current Performance, Likely Future Progress and Capacity to Improve
  8. Barber,, 1984, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age
  9. Barker,, 1982, Quangos in Britain, 10.1007/978-1-349-05613-2 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-05613-2
  10. Barker,, 2001, Legitimating Identities: The Self‐presentations of Rulers and Subjects, 10.1017/CBO9780511490163 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Barnes,, 1995, Disability Rights: Rhetoric and Reality in the UK, Disability and Society, 10.1080/09687599550023769 · doi:10.1080/09687599550023769
  12. Barnes,, 1999, Building a Deliberative Democracy: An Evaluation of Two Citizens' Juries
  13. Bartlett,, 1994, Quasi‐markets in the Welfare State
  14. Baumgartner,, 1998, Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science
  15. Beetham,, 1991, The Legitimation of Power, 10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 1994, Defining and Measuring Democracy
  17. 1998, Legitimacy and the European Union
  18. Bell,, 1993, Communitarianism and its Critics
  19. Benford,, 1992, Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power, Sociological Enquiry, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1992.tb00182.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Benhabib,, 1996, Democracy and Difference, 10.1515/9780691234168 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Beresford,, 1994, Disabled People, Service Users, User Involvement and Representation, Disability and Society, 10.1080/09687599466780361 · DOI
  22. Berg,, 2001, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences
  23. Bessette,, 1980, How Democratic is the Constitution?
  24. 1994, The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government
  25. Besterfield,, 1995, Total Quality Management
  26. Bevir,, 2003, Interpreting British Governance, 10.4324/9780203352311 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Birch,, 1971, Representation, 10.1007/978-1-349-01044-8 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-01044-8
  28. Blair,, 1998, The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century
  29. Bohman,, 1997, Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, 10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Boston,, 1996, Public Management: the New Zealand Model
  31. Bowie,, 1995, Consulting the Public about Health Service Priorities, British Medical Journal, 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1155 · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1155
  32. Broome,, 1984, Selecting People Randomly, Ethics, 10.1086/292596 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Brown,, 1980, Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science
  34. Burnheim,, 1985, Is Democracy Possible?
  35. Button,, 1999, Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation, Polity, 10.2307/3235238 · doi:10.2307/3235238
  36. Cairney,, 2002, New Public Management and the Thatcher Healthcare Legacy: Enough of the Theory, What about the Implementation?, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10.1111/1467-856X.00085 · doi:10.1111/1467-856x.00085
  37. Capella,, 1996, News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 10.1177/0002716296546001007 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Carlyle,, 1993, On Heroes, Hero‐worship, and the Heroic in History
  39. Carson,, 1999, Random Selection in Politics, 10.5040/9798216004707 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Catt,, 1996, Voting Behaviour: A Radical Critique
  41. 1999, Democracy in Practice
  42. Chambers,, 1996, Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse, 10.7591/9781501722547 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2000, Deliberation, Democracy, and the Media
  44. Chowcat,, 2000, Moral Pluralism, Political Justification and Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies, 10.1111/1467-9248.00281 · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00281
  45. Christiano,, 1996, Political Order: Nomos 38
  46. Coffey,, 1996, Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies
  47. Cohen,, 1989, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology
  48. 1992, Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance, Politics and Society, 10.1177/0032329292020004003 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Cohen,, 1973, Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers
  50. Commons, 2000, Minutes of Evidence
  51. Converse,, 1964, Ideology and discontent
  52. Coulter,, 2000, The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing
  53. Cox,, 2002, Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society
  54. Crook,, 1987, Legitimacy, Authority and the Transfer of Power in Ghana, Political Studies, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1987.tb00205.x · DOI
  55. Crosby,, 1998, Making Better Environmental Decisions
  56. Dahl,, 1961, Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City
  57. 1967, Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent
  58. 1971, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition
  59. 1989, Democracy and its Critics
  60. Davies,, 1998, Ordinary Wisdom: Reflections on an Experiment in Citizenship and Health
  61. Davis,, 1992, For Health or Profit? Medicine, the Pharmaceutical Industry, and the State in New Zealand
  62. Dawson,, 2001, The Private Finance Initiative: A Public Finance Illusion?, Health Economics, 10.1002/hec.644 · doi:10.1002/hec.644
  63. Day,, 1987, Accountabilities: Five Public Services
  64. Denver,, 1995, Political Communication, 10.1080/10584609.1995.9963062 · doi:10.1080/10584609.1995.9963062
  65. DETR, 1998, Guidance on Enhancing Public Participation in Local Government
  66. DHSS, 1983, NHS Management Inquiry (The Griffiths Report)
  67. Dienel,, 1995, Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation
  68. Doğanay,, 2004, Rethinking Democratic Procedures: Democracy and Deliberative Experiences in Turkey's LA21 Process, Political Studies, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00505.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00505.x
  69. DoH, 2000, The National Plan: Analysis of the Response to the Consultation Exercise Carried out in May/June 2000
  70. Dolan,, 1999, Effect of Discussion and Deliberation on the Public's Views of Priority Setting in Health Care: Focus Group Study, British Medical Journal, 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.916 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Driedger,, 1989, The Last Civil Rights Movement: Disabled People's International
  72. Driver,, 2000, Left, Right and the Third Way, Policy and Politics, 10.1332/0305573002500875 · doi:10.1332/0305573002500875
  73. Dryzek,, 1987, Complexity and Rationality in Public Life, Political Studies, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1987.tb00198.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1987.tb00198.x
  74. 1990, Discursive Democracy
  75. 1996, Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, Struggles
  76. 1996, The Theory of Institutional Design
  77. 2000, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations
  78. 2001, Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy, Political Theory, 10.1177/0090591701029005003 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 2005, Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia, Political Theory, 10.1177/0090591704268372 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 2002, Post‐communist Democratization: Political Discourses across Thirteen Countries, 10.1017/CBO9780511492112 · DOI
  81. Dunsire,, 1973, Administrative Doctrine and Administrative Change, Public Administration Bulletin
  82. Eckersley,, 2000, Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Association, and Representation
  83. Edelman,, 1976, The Symbolic Uses of Politics
  84. 1988, Constructing the Political Spectacle
  85. Elliott,, 1996, Blair to Give Public More Say with Citizens' Juries, The Times
  86. 1997, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology
  87. 1998, Deliberative Democracy, 10.1017/CBO9781139175005 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Emden,, 1956, The People and the Constitution
  89. Estlund,, 1997, Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics
  90. Farrell,, 2000, Evaluating Stakeholder Participation in Public services—Parents and Schools, Policy and Politics, 10.1332/0305573002500956 · doi:10.1332/0305573002500956
  91. Fennema,, 2000, Dealing with Extremists in Public Discussion: Front National and “Republican Front” in France, Journal of Political Philosophy, 10.1111/1467-9760.00108 · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00108
  92. Ferlie,, 1996, The New Public Management in Action, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198289029.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Fischer,, 1990, Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise
  94. Fischer,, 1993, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning
  95. Fisher,, 1990, Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
  96. Fishkin,, 1991, Democracy and Deliberation
  97. 1996, The Televised Deliberative Poll: An Experiment in Democracy, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 10.1177/0002716296546001012 · doi:10.1177/0002716296546001012
  98. 1997, The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy
  99. 2003, Consulting the Public through Deliberative Polling, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10.1002/pam.10101 · DOI
  100. 2000, Broadcasts of Deliberative Polls: Aspirations and Effects, British and Robert Luskin Journal of Political Science
  101. 2000, Deliberative Polling and Public Consultation, Parliamentary Affairs, 10.1093/pa/53.4.657 · DOI · Paper page
  102. Flathman,, 1972, Political Obligation
  103. Flinders,, 1999, Quangos, Accountability and Reform: The Politics of Quasi‐government, 10.1007/978-1-349-27027-9 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-27027-9
  104. Flyvbjerg,, 1998, Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice
  105. Foley,, 2000, A New Deal for the Community? Public Participation in Regeneration and Local Service Delivery, Policy and Politics, 10.1332/0305573002501090 · DOI
  106. Forester,, 1984, Bounded Rationality and the Politics of Muddling Through, Public Administration Review, 10.2307/975658 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 1999, The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
  108. Frankena,, 1968, Representation: Nomos 10
  109. Fraser,, 1992, Habermas and the Public Sphere
  110. Fukuyama,, 1989, The End of History?, The National Interest
  111. Fung,, 2003, Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences, Journal of Political Philosophy, 10.1111/1467-9760.00181 · DOI · Paper page
  112. 2005, Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World, Political Theory
  113. Gamble,, 1994, The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism
  114. Gavin,, 2003, The Press and its Influence on British Political Attitudes under New Labour, Political Studies, 10.1111/1467-9248.00442 · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00442
  115. Gergen,, 1991, Research and Reflexivity
  116. Gibson,, 2002, Constitutional Politics: the Republic Referendum and the Future
  117. Giddens,, 1998, The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy
  118. Goodall,, 1990, Small Group Communication in Organizations
  119. Goodin,, 1982, Political Theory and Public Policy
  120. 1992, Motivating Political Morality
  121. 1996, Enfranchising the Earth, and Its Alternatives, Political Studies, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00337.x · DOI · Paper page
  122. 1996, The Theory of Institutional Design, 10.1017/CBO9780511558320 · DOI · Paper page
  123. 2000, Democratic Deliberation Within, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00081.x · DOI · Paper page
  124. 2003, Representing Diversity, British Journal of Political Science, 10.1017/S0007123404000134 · doi:10.1017/s0007123404000134
  125. 1995, The Theory of Institutional Design
  126. 1980, Rational Participation: The Politics of Relative Power, British Journal of Political Science, 10.1017/S0007123400002209 · DOI · Paper page
  127. Goodwin,, 1992, Justice by Lottery
  128. Grafstein,, 1981, The Failure of Weber's Conception of Legitimacy: Its Causes and Implications, Journal of Politics, 10.2307/2130377 · DOI · Paper page
  129. Gray,, 1996, After Social Democracy: Politics, Capitalism and the Common Life
  130. Grey,, 2002, Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs, Parliamentary Affairs, 10.1093/parlij/55.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  131. Gunnell,, 1986, Between Philosophy and Politics: The Alienation of Political Theory
  132. Gutmann,, 1996, Democracy and Disagreement
  133. 2004, Why Deliberative Democracy?
  134. Habermas,, 1975, Legitimation Crisis
  135. 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action
  136. 1989, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society
  137. 1995, Journal of Philosophy, 10.2307/2940842 · DOI · Paper page
  138. 1996, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
  139. Hajer,, 1993, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning
  140. 2005, Setting the Stage: A Dramaturgy of Policy Deliberation, Administration and Society, 10.1177/0095399704270586 · DOI · Paper page
  141. Hall,, 1996, Citizens' Juries in Local Government: Report for the LGMB on the Pilot Projects
  142. Hallas,, 1976, CHCs in Action: A Review
  143. Ham,, 2004, Health Policy in Britain: The Politics and Organisation of the National Health Service
  144. Hamel,, 1993, Case Study Methods, 10.4135/9781412983587 · DOI · Paper page
  145. Harrison,, 1998, Which Champions, Which People? Public and User Involvement in Health Care as a Technology of Legitimation, Social Policy and Administration, 10.1111/1467-9515.00086 · DOI · Paper page
  146. Harrison,, 1994, Controlling Health Professionals: The Future of Work and Organization in the NHS
  147. Hendriks,, 2002, Institutions of Deliberative Democratic Processes and Interest Groups: Roles, Tensions and Incentives, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 10.1111/1467-8500.00259 · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.00259
  148. Hindess,, 1988, Choice, Rationality, and Social Theory
  149. Hogg,, 2001, Whose Interests Do Lay People Represent? Towards an Understanding of the Role of Lay People as Members of Committees, Health Expectations, 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00106.x · DOI
  150. 1998, The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management
  151. House, 2000, Official Report
  152. Humphrey,, 2000, Researching Disability Politics, or, Some Problems with the Social Model in Practice, Disability and Society, 10.1080/09687590025775 · DOI · Paper page
  153. Hunter,, 1997, Healthy Choices: Future Options for the NHS
  154. Iyengar,, 1996, Framing Responsibility for Political Issues, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 10.1177/0002716296546001006 · DOI · Paper page
  155. Jacobs,, 1999, The Oregon Health Plan and the Political Paradox of Rationing: What Advocates and Critics Have Claimed and What Oregon Did, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 10.1215/03616878-24-1-161 · DOI
  156. Jefferson, 1998, The Citizens Jury: Effective Public Participation
  157. John,, 1998, Analysing Public Policy
  158. Jorgenson,, 1991, Research and Reflexivity
  159. Joss,, 1995, Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe
  160. Judge,, 1999, Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain
  161. Kateb,, 1992, The Inner Ocean: Individualism and Democratic Culture
  162. Kavanagh,, 1987, Thatcherism and British Politics: The End of Consensus?
  163. Kellner,, 1995, Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identity, and Politics between the Modern and the Postmodern, 10.4324/9780203205808 · DOI · Paper page
  164. Kerbel,, 2000, PBS Ain't so Different: Public Broadcasting, Election Frames, and Democratic Empowerment, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10.1177/1081180X00005004002 · doi:10.1177/1081180x00005004002
  165. Kerr,, 1999, Postwar British Politics in Perspective
  166. Kingdon,, 1984, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies
  167. Klein,, 1990, The State and the Profession: The Politics of the Double Bed, British Medical Journal, 10.1136/bmj.301.6754.700 · doi:10.1136/bmj.301.6754.700
  168. 2000, The New Politics of the NHS
  169. 1996, Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health Service
  170. Klein,, 1976, The Politics of Consumer Representation: A Study of Community Health Councils
  171. Klingemann,, 1994, Parties, Politics and Democracy
  172. Kobach,, 1997, Spurn Thy Neighbour: Direct Democracy and Swiss Isolationism, West European Politics, 10.1080/01402389708425210 · doi:10.1080/01402389708425210
  173. Koch,, 1995, Social Reference Groups and Political Life
  174. Kogan,, 1975, Educational Policy‐making: A Study of Interest Groups and Parliament
  175. Kukathas,, 1996, The Communitarian Challenge to Liberalism
  176. Kuran,, 1998, Insincere Deliberation and Democratic Failure, Critical Review, 10.1080/08913819808443515 · DOI
  177. Kymlicka,, 1995, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights
  178. Lane,, 1987, Bureaucracy and Public Choice
  179. Langer,, 1998, Tabloid Television: Popular Journalism and the ‘Other News’
  180. Larmore,, 1987, Patterns of Moral Complexity, 10.1017/CBO9780511625107 · DOI · Paper page
  181. Le, 1993, Quasi‐markets and Social Policy
  182. Lenaghan,, 1999, Involving the Public in Rationing Decisions: The Experience of Citizens’ Juries, Health Policy, 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00042-1 · DOI · Paper page
  183. 1996, Setting Priorities: Is There a Role for Citizens' Juries?, British Medical Journal, 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1591 · DOI · Paper page
  184. Lewis,, 1974, The Voyages of Apollo: The Exploration of the Moon
  185. Lijphart,, 1984, Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives
  186. Lindblom,, 1965, The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment
  187. Lindenmann,, 1997, Setting Minimum Standards for Public Relations Effectiveness, Public Relations Review, 10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90053-9 · doi:10.1016/s0363-8111(97)90053-9
  188. Lipset,, 1984, Legitimacy and the State
  189. Luban,, 2002, The Publicity of Law and the Regulatory State, Journal of Political Philosophy, 10.1111/1467-9760.00154 · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00154
  190. Luskin,, 2002, Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain, British Journal of Political Science, 10.1017/S0007123402000194 · DOI · Paper page
  191. Macedo,, 1999, Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, 10.1093/oso/9780195131918.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  192. MacGregor,, 1997, Live, Direct, and Biased? Making Television News in the Satellite Age
  193. 2003, Democracy Defended, 10.1017/CBO9780511490293 · DOI · Paper page
  194. Majone,, 1989, Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process
  195. Manin,, 1987, On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation, Political Theory, 10.1177/0090591787015003005 · DOI · Paper page
  196. 1997, The Principles of Representative Government, 10.1017/CBO9780511659935 · DOI · Paper page
  197. Mansbridge,, 1992, The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed
  198. 1998, Working Papers on Political Theory and Ethics, 98‐17
  199. 1999, Deliberative Politics: Essays on ‘Democracy and Disagreement’
  200. March,, 1958, Organizations

200 of 326 shown

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Parkinson, J.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Published
2006-06-15
DOI
10.1093/019929111x.001.0001
OpenAlex
W2479544630
Cited by
467
References
11
FWCI
28.78
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/019929111x.001.0001
The paper
Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1093/019929111x.001.0001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.