Cited by 333Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolutionary Context of Human Development: The Cooperative Breeding Model

Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer·2007·Family Relationships

Abstract

According to the Cooperative Breeding Hypothesis, allomaternal assistance was essential for child survival during the Pleistocene. This breeding system permitted hominid females to produce offspring without increasing inter-birth intervals, and allowed for movement into new habitats. Reliance on allomaternal assistance would make maternal commitment more dependent on the mother's perception of probable support from others than is the case in most other primates. One artifact of such investment would be newborns who needed to monitor and engage mothers, as well as older infants and juveniles who benefited from eliciting care and provisioning from a range of caretakers across the prolonged period of dependence characteristic of young in cooperative breeders. Developing in a social context where infants and children who are more skilled at reading the intentions of others and engaging their solicitude would be more likely to survive and prosper has obvious implications for the evolution of Theory of Mind.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320510.003.0003

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Hrdy, S. B.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer
Venue
Family Relationships
Published
2007-10-01
Pages
39-68
OpenAlex
W1480541319
Cited by
333
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
34.82
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
cooperative breeding, human evolution, Pleistocene, birth interval, maternal investment, infant social cognition, theory of mind, social provision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review