Cited by 1,344Philosophical Ethics and TheoryCritical Realism in SociologyPolitical Philosophy and Ethics

Group Agency

List, Christian, Pettit, Philip·2011·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Are companies, churches, and states genuine agents? How do we explain their behaviour? Can we treat them as accountable for their actions? List and Pettit offer arguments, grounded in work on social choice, economics, and philosophy, to show there really are group agents, over and above the individual agents who compose them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emergence of co-operative agency patterns, when supported by action coordination mechanisms, invites consideration of human-AI dyads through group agency.

    “The emergence of co-operative agency patterns (Section 5.1), particularly when supported by mechanisms enabling 'Action Coordination' (Section 6), invites consideration of human-AI dyads through the lens of group agency [103].”
  • Current AI (automated systems built with machine learning) are agents.

    “This paper simply grants that such systems are agents.”

    From Instrumental Robots. (2020) · cites this paper as List and Pettit 2011

  • A system plausibly has states playing the causal-functional role of intentions if it has representational states, motivational states, and the capacity to process them so as to intervene suitably in the environment.

    “A system plausibly has such states if it has (List and Pettit 2011: 20): (1) “representational states that depict how things are in the environment,” (2) “motivational states that specify how it requires things to be in the environment,” and (3) “the capacity to process its representational and motivational states, leading it to intervene suitably in the environment whenever that environment fails”

    From Instrumental Robots. (2020) · cites this paper as List and Pettit 2011

  • The international community is increasingly converging on a set of principles, such as jus cogens and human rights, constituting a common ground on the basis of which decisions about international political morality have to be made.

    “This form of pluralism-driven scepticism appears all the less well-founded at a time when the international community is increasingly converging on a set of principles, such as jus cogens and human rights, constituting a common ground on the basis of which decisions about international political morality have to be made.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
List, C., & Pettit, P.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2011-04-01
OpenAlex
W4252316183
Cited by
1,344
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 148 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 23
FWCI
50.96
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
collective agency, corporate agents, collective responsibility, moral agency, social choice, political philosophy, law and morality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review