Cited by 361Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Why bioelectrical impedance analysis should be used for estimating adiposity.

Open access
Houtkooper, LB, Lohman, TG, Going, SB, Howell, WH·1996·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) approach for estimating adiposity and body fat is based on empirical relations established by many investigators. Properly used, this noninvasive body-composition assessment approach can quickly, easily, and relatively inexpensively provide accurate and reliable estimates of fat-free mass (FFM) and total body water (TBW) in healthy populations. The estimated FFM or TBW values are used to calculate absolute and relative body fat amounts. When different investigators follow the same standard BIA procedures and use the same population and criterion method, similar prediction equations and relatively small prediction errors have been reported for measurement of FFM and TBW (SEE: 1.7-3.0 for FFM and 0.23-1.5 kg for TBW). The BIA approach is most appropriate for estimating adiposity of groups in epidemiologic and field studies but has limited accuracy for estimating body composition in individuals. When used as a simple index (stature2/ resistance), BIA is more sensitive and specific for grading average adiposity in groups than some other anthropometric indexes such as the body mass index. Prediction equations based on BIA have been validated and cross-validated in children, youths, adults, and the elderly, in primarily white populations and, to a limited extent, in Asian, black, and Native American populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/64.3.436s

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houtkooper, L., Lohman, T., Going, S., & Howell, W.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-09
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
436S-448S
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1883063305
Cited by
361
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, adiposity, body composition, fat-free mass, total body water, prediction equations, body fat estimation, anthropometric index, body mass index, measurement error, cross-validation
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Electrophysiology, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review