The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal
Abstract
A method is proposed for estimating intra-block and inter-blook weights in the analysis of incomplete block designs with block sizes not necessarily equal. The method consists of maximizing the likelihood, not of all the data, but of a set of selected error contrasts. When block sizes are equal results are identical with those obtained by the method of Nelder (1968) for generally balanced designs. Although mainly concerned with incomplete block designs the paper also gives in outline an extension of the modified maximum likelihood procedure to designs with a more complicated block structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
“It can be shown that the estimates Of u2, 3l *,s ak+1 found in this way are identical to those described by Patterson and Thompson (1971), Corbeil and Searle (1976) and Harville (1977) under the label REML, or "restricted" maximum likelihood.”
ResultApplied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2011) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,279
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.608 · Cited by 4,446
Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood
Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533558 · Cited by 4,552
Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems
Harville, D. A. (1977) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1977.10480998 · Cited by 2,667
Heritability in the genomics era — concepts and misconceptions
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G., & Wray, N. R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2322 · Cited by 1,921
Haley, C. S., & Knott, S. A. (1992) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1992.131 · Cited by 1,991
Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts
Loh, P.-R., Tucker, G., Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Finucane, H. K., Salem, R. M., Chasman, D. I., Ridker, P. M., Neale, B. M., Berger, B., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3190 · Cited by 1,507
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0032968 · Cited by 1,342
Estimating Missing Heritability for Disease from Genome-wide Association Studies
Lee, S. H., Wray, N. R., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2011) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.02.002 · Cited by 1,064
Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting
Silverman, B. W. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01327.x · Cited by 1,117
Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits
Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000008 · Cited by 1,039
Study, T. L. C., Yang, J., Bakshi, A., Zhu, Z., Hemani, G., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., Lee, S. H., Robinson, M. R., Perry, J. R. B., Nolte, I. M., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3390 · Cited by 745
SMITH, A. B., CULLIS, B. R., & THOMPSON, R. (2005) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005587 · Cited by 623
Self-citationMultiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem.
Friston, K., Harrison, L., Daunizeau, J., Kiebel, S., Phillips, C., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Henson, R., Flandin, G., & Mattout, J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.048 · Cited by 589
The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines
Verbyla, A. P., Cullis, B. R., Kenward, M. G., & Welham, S. J. (1999) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00154 · Cited by 570
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
Self-citationMalosetti, M., Ribaut, J.-M., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00044 · Cited by 539
“…σjj∗√ σ2j √ σ2j∗ = σ 2 G√ σ2G + σ2ε √ σ2G + σ2ε = σ 2 G σ2G + σ2ε Although mixed models can be fitted by standard least squares procedures in the case of balanced data, a more general method of inference to fit mixed models is by residual maximum likelihood, or REML (Patterson and Thompson, 1971).”
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Loh, P.-R., Bhatia, G., Gusev, A., Finucane, H. K., Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Pollack, S. J., de Candia, T. R., Lee, S. H., Wray, N. R., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3431 · Cited by 449
Kass, R. E., & Steffey, D. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478825 · Cited by 474
Genomic-Assisted Prediction of Genetic Value With Semiparametric Procedures
Gianola, D., Fernando, R. L., & Stella, A. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.049510 · Cited by 450
Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR: Design, Calculations, and Statistics
Rieu, I., & Powers, S. J. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.066001 · Cited by 451
McNeish, D., & Kelley, K. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000182 · Cited by 336
Genome-wide association study identifies a locus at 7p15.2 associated with endometriosis
Painter, J. N., Anderson, C. A., Nyholt, D. R., Macgregor, S., Lin, J., Lee, S. H., Lambert, A., Zhao, Z. Z., Roseman, F., Guo, Q., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.731 · Cited by 308
The analysis of binomial data by a generalized linear mixed model
GILMOUR, A. R., ANDERSON, R. D., & RAE, A. L. (1985) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/72.3.593 · Cited by 304
The heritability of human disease: estimation, uses and abuses.
Tenesa, A., & Haley, C. S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3377 · Cited by 283
Lavin, S. R., Karasov, W. H., Ives, A. R., Middleton, K. M., & Garland Jr., T. (2008) · Physiological and Biochemical Zoology · doi:10.1086/590395 · Cited by 289
Brooks, D. R., Bater, J. E., Clark, S. J., Monteith, D. T., Andrews, C., Corbett, S. J., Beaumont, D. A., & Chapman, J. W. (2012) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02194.x · Cited by 247
Estimating variance components in a class of mixed models by restricted maximum likelihood
Smith, S. P., & Graser, H.-U. (1986) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(86)80516-1 · Cited by 247
Random-effects meta-analysis: The number of studies matters
Guolo, A., & Varin, C. (2017) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280215583568 · Cited by 203
Kelly, A. M., Smith, A. B., Eccleston, J. A., & Cullis, B. R. (2007) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.08.0540 · Cited by 185
Schoech, A. P., Jordan, D. M., Loh, P.-R., Gazal, S., O’Connor, L. J., Balick, D. J., Palamara, P. F., Finucane, H. K., Sunyaev, S. R., & Price, A. L. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08424-6 · Cited by 157
A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components
Visscher, P. M. (2006) · Twin Research and Human Genetics · doi:10.1375/twin.9.4.490 · Cited by 169
A meta-analysis on verbal working memory in children and adolescents with ADHD
Ramos, A. A., Hamdan, A. C., & Machado, L. (2020) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1604998 · Cited by 125
Gutiérrez-Gil, B., Wiener, P., & Williams, J. L. (2007) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-8-56 · Cited by 117
Split-Plot Designs and Estimation Methods for Mixture Experiments With Process Variables
Kowalski, S. M., Cornell, J. A., & Vining, G. G. (2002) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/004017002753398344 · Cited by 112
Genetic variation in aggression-related traits in Golden Retriever dogs
Liinamo, A.-E., van den Berg, L., Leegwater, P. A. J., Schilder, M. B. H., van Arendonk, J. A. M., & van Oost, B. A. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.025 · Cited by 103
A comparison of analysis methods for late-stage variety evaluation trials
Welham, S. J., Gogel, B. J., Smith, A. B., Thompson, R., & Cullis, B. R. (2010) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2010.00570.x · Cited by 98
Self-citationBETTEY, M., FINCH‐SAVAGE, W. E., KING, G. J., & LYNN, J. R. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00760.x · Cited by 96
Chervova, O., Panteleeva, K., Chernysheva, E., Widayati, T. A., Baronik, Ž. F., Hrbková, N., Schneider, J. L., Bobak, M., Beck, S., & Voloshin, V. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102552 · Cited by 91
Steels, E., Rao, A., & Vitetta, L. (2011) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.3360 · Cited by 71
Statistical analysis of two-dimensional variation in variety yield trials
Kempton, R. A., Seraphin, J. C., & Sword, A. M. (1994) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600067253 · Cited by 67
Genomic selection using random regressions on known and latent environmental covariates
Tolhurst, D. J., Gaynor, R. C., Gardunia, B., Hickey, J. M., & Gorjanc, G. (2022) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-022-04186-w · Cited by 66
Analysis of Variety Yield Trials Using Two-Dimensional Separable ARIMA Processes
Grondona, M. O., Crossa, J., Fox, P. N., & Pfeiffer, W. H. (1996) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532916 · Cited by 66
Efficient variance components analysis across millions of genomes
Pazokitoroudi, A., Wu, Y., Burch, K. S., Hou, K., Zhou, A., Pasaniuc, B., & Sankararaman, S. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17576-9 · Cited by 55
Mixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC–MS proteomics studies
Daly, D. S., Anderson, K. K., Panisko, E. A., Purvine, S. O., Fang, R., Monroe, M. E., & Baker, S. E. (2008) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr070441i · Cited by 50
Near-infrared spectroscopy on chopper to measure maize forage quality parameters online
Welle, R., Greten, W., Rietmann, B., Alley, S., Sinnaeve, G., & Dardenne, P. (2003) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.1407 · Cited by 48
Tolhurst, D. J., Mathews, K. L., Smith, A. B., & Cullis, B. R. (2019) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1111/jbg.12404 · Cited by 48
Genetic parameters of aggressiveness, ferocity and mobility in the fighting bull breed
Silva, B., Gonzalo, A., & Cañón, J. (2006) · Animal Research · doi:10.1051/animres:2005046 · Cited by 46
Seed and fruit set of the lateral suppressor mutant of tomato.
Groot, S. P. C., Keizer, L. C. P., de Ruiter, W., & Dons, J. J. M. (1994) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/0304-4238(94)90082-5 · Cited by 24
Mumford, M. H., Forknall, C. R., Rodriguez, D., Eyre, J. X., & Kelly, A. M. (2023) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109133 · Cited by 22
Argaw, T., Fenta, B. A., Zegeye, H., Azmach, G., & Funga, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2025.1472282 · Cited by 19
“First, the variance parameters of the model are estimated using Residual Maximum Likelihood (REML), an approach introduced by Patterson and Thompson (1971).”
Tensor cubic smoothing splines in designed experiments requiring residual modelling
Verbyla, A. P., De Faveri, J., Wilkie, J. D., & Lewis, T. (2018) · Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-018-0334-9 · Cited by 16
Rodriguez, J. E., Williams, D. R., & Bürkner, P. (2023) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12299 · Cited by 14
Random regression models for multi-environment, multi-time data from crop breeding selection trials
De Faveri, J., Verbyla, A. P., & Rebetzke, G. (2023) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp21732 · Cited by 12
Argaw, T., Fenta, B. A., & Assefa, E. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301534 · Cited by 11
Fernandes Filho, C. C., Murad Leite Andrade, M. H., Rodrigues Nunes, J. A., Wipff, J., Hignight, D. L., Rios, E. F., Kenworthy, K., & Hignight, K. (2023) · Grassland Research · doi:10.1002/glr2.12045 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- PATTERSON, H. D., & THOMPSON, R.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1971
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 545-554
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2000084758
- Cited by
- 4,058
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.