Cited by 96Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Brain differences between persistent and remitted attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Mattfeld, Aaron T., Gabrieli, John D. E., Biederman, Joseph, Spencer, Thomas, Brown, Ariel, Kotte, Amelia, Kagan, Elana, Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan·2014·Brain

Abstract

Previous resting state studies examining the brain basis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder have not distinguished between patients who persist versus those who remit from the diagnosis as adults. To characterize the neurobiological differences and similarities of persistence and remittance, we performed resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging in individuals who had been longitudinally and uniformly characterized as having or not having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in childhood and again in adulthood (16 years after baseline assessment). Intrinsic functional brain organization was measured in patients who had a persistent diagnosis in childhood and adulthood (n = 13), in patients who met diagnosis in childhood but not in adulthood (n = 22), and in control participants who never had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (n = 17). A positive functional correlation between posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortices, major components of the default-mode network, was reduced only in patients whose diagnosis persisted into adulthood. A negative functional correlation between medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices was reduced in both persistent and remitted patients. The neurobiological dissociation between the persistence and remittance of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder may provide a framework for the relation between the clinical diagnosis, which indicates the need for treatment, and additional deficits that are common, such as executive dysfunctions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awu137

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Remission of ADHD has been associated with normalization of abnormalities as measured by activation during functional imaging tasks, cortical thinning and structural and functional brain connectivity.

    “Remission of ADHD has been associated with normalization of abnormalities as measured by activation during functional imaging tasks 90 , cortical thinning 91 and structural and functional brain connectivity 92-95 .”

    From Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2015) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Discussion reports that posterior cingulate–medial prefrontal functional connectivity in adults with remitted ADHD resembled controls, unlike adults with persistent ADHD. It also reports another functional-connectivity abnormality in both ADHD groups. This paper studied resting-state functional connectivity, not structural connectivity; the separate task-activation and cortical-thinning citations are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattfeld, A. T., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Biederman, J., Spencer, T., Brown, A., Kotte, A., Kagan, E., & Whitfield-Gabrieli, S.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Venue
Brain
Published
2014-05-31
Volume
137
Issue
9
Pages
2423-2428
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1993094730
Cited by
96
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, persistent ADHD, adult ADHD, resting-state functional connectivity, default mode network, posterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, executive dysfunction, longitudinal neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Nerve Net, Remission, Spontaneous, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review