Cited by 359Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of response modality and processing domain

Barch, D. M.·2001·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Studies of a variety of higher cognitive functions consistently activate a region of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), situated posterior to the genu and superior to the corpus callosum. However, it is not clear whether the same ACC region is activated for all response modalities (e.g. vocal and manual) and/or all processing domains (e.g. verbal and spatial). To explore this question, we used rapid event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging and a spatial Stroop task with conditions tapping both verbal and spatial processing. We also employed novel methods that allowed us to acquire the accuracy and reaction times of both manual and vocal responses. We found one large ACC region that demonstrated significant response conflict effects with both vocal and manual responses, and three ACC regions that demonstrated significant response conflict effects with both spatial and verbal processing. We did not find any ACC regions that demonstrated activity selective to either a specific response modality or processing domain. Thus, our results suggest that the same regions of ACC are responsive to conflict arising with both manual and vocal output and with both spatial and verbal processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/11.9.837

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both TDC and ASD, DC showed positive relationships with regions implicated in cognitive control.

    “In both TDC and ASD, DC showed positive relationships with regions implicated in cognitive control (63-65)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barch, D. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Barch, D. M.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
837-848
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2071650248
Cited by
359
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
anterior cingulate cortex, response conflict, response modality, spatial Stroop task, verbal processing, spatial processing, manual response, vocal responses, reaction time
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Conflict, Psychological, Evoked Potentials, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reaction Time, Sound Localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review