Cited by 120Multisensory perception and integrationOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeuroscience and Music Perception

A Fruity Note: Crossmodal associations between odors and musical notes

Crisinel, A.-S., Spence, C.·2012·Chemical Senses

Abstract

Odors are notoriously difficult to describe, but they seem prone to a variety of crossmodal associations. In the present study, we generalize the previously-shown association between odors (from perfumery) and pitch (Belkin et al. 1997) to odors related to food and drink (in this case those associated with wine). We also demonstrate that, to a lesser extent (25% of the odor tested), participants preferentially match specific odors to certain types of instruments. The ratings of the odors along a number of dimensions are used in principal components analysis (PCA) to explore the psychological dimensions underlying the odor-pitch associations. The results demonstrate that both pleasantness and complexity, but not intensity, appear to play a role when choosing a pitch to match an odor. Our results suggest that these features of odor stimuli constitute psychological dimensions that can be consistently matched to auditory features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/bjr085

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gal D, Wheeler SC, Shiv B. 2007. Cross-modal influences on gustatory perception. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030197.
  2. A Fruity Note: Crossmodal associations between odors and musical notes 157 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chemse/article/37/2/151/272870 by guest on 04 July 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crisinel, A.-S., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
2011-08-18
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
151-158
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W2143065224
Cited by
120
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
cross-modal correspondence, musical notes, odor pleasantness, odor intensity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Flavoring Agents, Fruit, Humans, Middle Aged, Music, Odorants, Pitch Perception, Smell, Wine, Olfactory Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review