Cited by 232Multisensory perception and integrationSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsCategorization, perception, and language

Grape expectations: The role of cognitive influences in color-flavor interactions

Shankar, Maya U., Levitan, Carmel A., Spence, Charles·2010·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Color conveys critical information about the flavor of food and drink by providing clues as to edibility, flavor identity, and flavor intensity. Despite the fact that more than 100 published papers have investigated the influence of color on flavor perception in humans, surprisingly little research has considered how cognitive and contextual constraints may mediate color-flavor interactions. In this review, we argue that the discrepancies demonstrated in previously-published color-flavor studies may, at least in part, reflect differences in the sensory expectations that different people generate as a result of their prior associative experiences. We propose that color-flavor interactions in flavor perception cannot be understood solely in terms of the principles of multisensory integration (the currently dominant theoretical framework) but that the role of higher-level cognitive factors, such as expectations, must also be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.008

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human neuroimaging and animal electrophysiology show that expectations can modulate sensory processing at both early and late stages, with response modulation either dampened or enhanced.

    “Human neuroimaging and animal electrophysiology has shown that expectations can modulate sensory processing at both early and late stages, and the response modulation can be either dampened or enhanced (see References [180-182] for reviews).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shankar, M. U., Levitan, C. A., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Shankar, Maya U.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
380-390
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039217349
Cited by
232
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
flavor perception, color perception, sensory expectations, cognitive effects, multisensory integration, associative learning, food color, grape color
MeSH terms
Association Learning, Beverages, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Color, Color Perception, Drinking, Humans, Semantics, Smell, Taste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review