Cited by 352Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsHealth disparities and outcomes

Religion and mortality among the community-dwelling elderly.

Open access
Oman, D, Reed, D·1998·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the prospective association between attending religious services and all-cause mortality to determine whether the association is explainable by 6 confounding factors: demographics, health status, physical functioning, health habits, social functioning and support, and psychological state. METHODS: The association between self-reported religious attendance and subsequent mortality over 5 years for 1931 older residents of Marin County, California, was examined by proportional hazards regression. Interaction terms of religion with social support were used to explore whether other forms of social support could substitute for religion and diminish its protective effect. RESULTS: Persons who attended religious services had lower mortality than those who did not (age- and sex-adjusted relative hazard [RH] = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52, 0.78). Multivariate adjustment reduced this relationship only slightly (RH = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.62, 0.94), primarily by including physical functioning and social support. Contrary to hypothesis, religious attendance tended to be slightly more protective for those with high social support. CONCLUSIONS: Lower mortality rates for those who attend religious services are only partly explained by the 6 possible confounders listed above. Psychodynamic and other explanations need further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1469

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the nine best cholesterol studies, five (56%) reported lower cholesterol or a lowering of cholesterol in response to an R/S intervention, whereas one found higher cholesterol but only in Mexican American men.

    “Of the nine best studies, five (56%) reported lower cholesterol [311–313] or a lowering of cholesterol in response to a R/S intervention [314, 315], whereas one found higher cholesterol (but only in Mexican American men) [316].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [312]

    The available study description reports religious-service attendance and five-year mortality among older Marin County residents, not cholesterol outcomes (study description, pp. 1469–1475; page of passage unspecified). Searches for cholesterol and Mexican American men found no passage addressing the higher-cholesterol finding attributed to this source. The cited-paper copy therefore does not verify that part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oman, D., & Reed, D.
Affiliations
Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
ORCID
Oman, D
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1998-10
Volume
88
Issue
10
Pages
1469-1475
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2035699317
Cited by
350
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
religious service attendance, mortality, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, social support, physical function, health status, health habits, psychological state, confounding factors, Marin County
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Prospective Studies, Religion, Religion and Medicine, Religion and Psychology, Social Support, Health Behavior, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review