Cited by 56Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPhysical Activity and Health

Aging and physical function in type 2 diabetes: 8 years of an intensive lifestyle intervention

Open access
Rejeski, W. Jack, Bray, George A., Chen, Shyh-Huei, Clark, Jeanne M., Evans, Mary, Hill, James O., Jakicic, John M., Johnson, Karen C. +3 more·2015·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background Compared with adults without type 2 diabetes mellitus, those with the disease experience more limitations in their physical functioning (PF). Look AHEAD is a large multicenter trial that examined the effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) for weight loss on cardiovascular outcomes compared with diabetes support and education (DSE). Although the current study compared treatment differences between ILI and DSE on PF, the primary goal was to examine whether this effect was moderated by age and history of cardiovascular disease at enrollment. Methods Overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 5,145) were randomly assigned to either ILI or DSE. The mean (±SD) age and % females in ILI was 58.9 years (±6.9) and 59.8%; it was 58.6 years (6.8) and 59.5% in DSE. Analysis in 4,998 participants assessed the differential rates of decline in PF across a period of 8 years for the ILI and DSE groups. Results ILI resulted in improved PF compared with DSE after 1 year (p Conclusion With the exception of persons who had a history of cardiovascular disease, ILI slowed the decline in PF with type 2 diabetes mellitus despite weight regain, an effect that was stronger for older than younger participants and could translate into reductions in falls and disability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glu083

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In age-stratified analyses of Look AHEAD, older adults in the trial (60 to early 70s) had similar benefits compared with younger people.

    “In age-stratified analyses, older adults in the trial (60 to early 70s) had similar benefits compared with younger people (83,84).”
  • In age-stratified analyses of Look AHEAD, older adults in the trial (60 to early 70s) had similar benefits compared with younger people.

    “In age-stratified analyses, older adults in the trial (60 to early 70s) had similar benefits compared with younger people (90,91).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [90]

  • Age-stratified analyses showed that older adults in the Look AHEAD trial (aged 60-70 years) experienced benefits similar to those seen for younger participants.

    “Age-stratified analyses showed that older adults in the trial (aged 60–70 years) experienced benefits similar to those seen for younger participants”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [101]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rejeski, W. J., Bray, G. A., Chen, S.-H., Clark, J. M., Evans, M., Hill, J. O., Jakicic, J. M., Johnson, K. C., Neiberg, R., Ip, E. H., & the Look AHEAD Research Group
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
345-353
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2171118722
Cited by
56
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001120, UL1TR001082, UL1TR000170, 5p30dk046204-15)
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG042761)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R18HL076441)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-57171, DK 57136, DK57149, DK 57002, DK57182, DK56990, (DK 046204, DK57008, DK57177, DK 57078, DK57219, U01DK057149, DK-57178, U01DK057151, U01DK057135, U01DK057131, U01DK056990, DK-57135, U01DK057136, DK-56992, DK57154, U01DK057178, U01DK057182, U01DK057078, U01DK057154, U01DK057008, U01DK057171, DK57131, U01DK057219, U01DK056992, U01DK057177, P30DK017047, P30DK048520, DK 57151, P30-DK 48520)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR-0021140, M01RR-00051, M01RR002719, M01RR000056, M01RR01346, M01RR000051, M01RR001066, M01RR001346, UL1RR024153, M0-1-RR-02719, M01-RR01066)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, physical function, aging, intensive lifestyle intervention, diabetes support and education, weight loss, weight regain, cardiovascular disease history, older adults, Look AHEAD trial, disability, falls
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review