Cited by 51Bone health and osteoporosis researchNutrition and Health in AgingHIV-related health complications and treatments

Weight loss-induced reduction of bone mineral density in older adults with obesity

Open access
Jiang, Bryan C., Villareal, Dennis T.·2019·Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

Obesity in older adults is a growing public health problem, yet the appropriate treatment remains controversial partly due to evidence that weight loss reduces bone mass and may increase fracture risk. The purpose of this review is to summarize the research to date on the effects of diet-induced weight loss on bone health in obese (body mass index 30 kg/m2 and above) older (aged 65 years or older) adults. Observational studies have shown that weight loss in this population decreases total hip bone mineral density and increases the risk of frailty fractures (composite of proximal femur, pelvis, and proximal humerus fractures). Randomized controlled trials have largely confirmed these earlier observations but have also shown that exercise, particularly progressive resistance training, can attenuate or even alleviate this bone loss. Further research incorporating outcomes concerning bone quality and mass are needed to identify the optimal exercise and nutritional regimens to counteract the bone loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21551197.2018.1564721

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calorie restriction-induced weight loss causes a decline in lean mass and bone mineral density.

    “Weight loss achieved through calorie restriction causes a decline in lean mass and bone mineral density.”

    From The Benefits of Exercise Training in Combination With Weight Loss Therapies (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    The section “Effect of Weight Loss on Bone Mass and Fracture Risk in Older Adults” reports that diet-only weight loss reduced total-hip BMD in older adults with obesity. “Mechanisms for Bone Loss” discusses muscle loss during voluntary weight loss, and “Measures to Counter Bone Loss” says higher-protein diets help preserve lean mass during weight-loss interventions. The citing sentence omits the paper’s focus on older adults with obesity and states the effects as a general consequence of calorie restriction. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Progressive resistance training during calorie restriction reduces bone mineral density loss.

    “When performed alongside CR, progressive resistance training (RT) attenuates this loss of lean mass and bone mass, while the addition of aerobic training (AT) further improves cardiorespiratory fitness.”
  • Weight loss interventions are associated with loss of lean body mass and bone mineral density.

    “concerns persist about the loss of lean body mass and bone mineral density (BMD) associated with weight loss interventions (9,10).”
  • Preservation of skeletal muscle by resistance training during calorie restriction mitigates loss of total hip bone mineral density assessed with DXA.

    “the preservation of skeletal muscle by RT during CR mitigates the loss of BMD at the total hip, assessed with DXA (10).”
  • Potential negative effects of hypocaloric diets on micronutrient status and bone mineral density may occur.

    “Potential negative effects on micronutrient status and on bone mineral density may also occur166.”

    From Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: a clinical overview (2024) · cites this paper as [166]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2016: with chartbook on long-term trends in health National Center for Health Statistics Website. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus16.pdf#058. Published 5 2017 Accessed March 25, 2018. 28910066

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, B. C., & Villareal, D. T.
Affiliations
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Villareal, Dennis T.
Venue
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics
Published
2019-01-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
100-114
ISSN
  • 2155-1197 (ISSN-L)
  • 2155-1200
OpenAlex
W2916715307
Cited by
50
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
Keywords
weight loss, bone mineral density, obesity, older adults, hip bone loss, fracture risk, resistance training, physical activity, bone health, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Obesity, Weight Loss, Exercise, Bone Density, Body Mass Index, Frail Elderly, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review