Cited by 1,064Advanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchData Visualization and AnalyticsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Clustering trees: a visualization for evaluating clusterings at multiple resolutions

Open access
Zappia, Luke, Oshlack, Alicia·2018·GigaScience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Clustering techniques are widely used in the analysis of large datasets to group together samples with similar properties. For example, clustering is often used in the field of single-cell RNA-sequencing in order to identify different cell types present in a tissue sample. There are many algorithms for performing clustering, and the results can vary substantially. In particular, the number of groups present in a dataset is often unknown, and the number of clusters identified by an algorithm can change based on the parameters used. To explore and examine the impact of varying clustering resolution, we present clustering trees. This visualization shows the relationships between clusters at multiple resolutions, allowing researchers to see how samples move as the number of clusters increases. In addition, meta-information can be overlaid on the tree to inform the choice of resolution and guide in identification of clusters. We illustrate the features of clustering trees using a series of simulations as well as two real examples, the classical iris dataset and a complex single-cell RNA-sequencing dataset. Clustering trees can be produced using the clustree R package, available from CRAN and developed on GitHub.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gigascience/giy083

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Anderson E The irises of the Gaspe Peninsula. Bulletin of the American Iris Society. 1935; 59: 2– 5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zappia, L., & Oshlack, A.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Oshlack, Alicia
Venue
GigaScience
Published
2018-07-01
Volume
7
Issue
7
ISSN
2047-217X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952100718
Cited by
1,064
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 215 · 2025: 235 · 2024: 246 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5
FWCI
17.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GigaScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1126157)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
clustering tree, cluster validation, hierarchical clustering, cluster visualization, single-cell RNA sequencing, cell type annotation, number of clusters, Iris dataset
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Immune System, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Mitochondria, Software, Models, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review