Cited by 476Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genome-wide association analysis of susceptibility and clinical phenotype in multiple sclerosis

Open access
Baranzini, Sergio E., Wang, Joanne, Gibson, Rachel A., Galwey, Nicholas, Naegelin, Yvonne, Barkhof, Frederik, Radue, Ernst-Wilhelm, Lindberg, Raija L.P. +29 more·2009·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic disorder of the central nervous system and common cause of neurological disability in young adults, is characterized by moderate but complex risk heritability. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study performed in a 1000 prospective case series of well-characterized individuals with MS and group-matched controls using the Sentrix HumanHap550 BeadChip platform from Illumina. After stringent quality control data filtering, we compared allele frequencies for 551 642 SNPs in 978 cases and 883 controls and assessed genotypic influences on susceptibility, age of onset, disease severity, as well as brain lesion load and normalized brain volume from magnetic resonance imaging exams. A multi-analytical strategy identified 242 susceptibility SNPs exceeding established thresholds of significance, including 65 within the MHC locus in chromosome 6p21.3. Independent replication confirms a role for GPC5, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, in disease risk. Gene ontology-based analysis shows a functional dichotomy between genes involved in the susceptibility pathway and those affecting the clinical phenotype.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddn388

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By 2011, common variants in 26 genomic loci had been associated with multiple sclerosis risk and independently replicated.

    “by 2011, common variants in 26 genomic loci had been associated with MS risk and independently replicated”

    From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies several MS susceptibility genes, including IL2RA, CD58, CLEC16A and EVI5, as independently replicated. It does not report 26 replicated genomic loci or establish a count as of 2011; the Results (page unavailable) also caution that this study lacked full-scale independent replication. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies have explored the genetic basis of clinical course, age of onset and severity, although no genome-wide significant associations have been discovered.

    “Several studies have explored the genetic basis of clinical course, age of onset and severity, although no genome‐wide significant associations have been discovered.36, 37, 43, 74, 75, 76, 77”

    From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction describes earlier studies of genetic influences on MS severity and clinical course, and the genotype–phenotype analysis section says this study assessed age of onset and the severity metric MSSS. The cited passages do not establish the broader claim that no genome-wide significant associations had been discovered; the Discussion reports significant phenotype associations without stating whether they met a genome-wide threshold. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fauci, A.D., Kasper, D.L., Braunwald, E., Hauser, S.L., Longo, D.L. and Jameson, J.L. (eds), Harrison's Principle of Internal Medicine, 17th edn. McGraw Hill, NY.
  2. DeLuca, G.C., Ramagopalan, S.V., Herrera, B.M., Dyment, D.A., Lincoln, M.R., Montpetit, A., Pugliatti, M., Barnardo, M.C., Risch, N.J., Sadovnick, A.D. et al. (2007) An extremes of outcome strategy provides evidence that multiple sclerosis severity is determined by alleles at the HLA-DRB1 locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 20896-20901.
  3. Smith, M.E. (1999) Phagocytosis of myelin in demyelinative disease: a review. Neurochem. Res., 24, 261-268.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baranzini, S. E., Wang, J., Gibson, R. A., Galwey, N., Naegelin, Y., Barkhof, F., Radue, E.-W., Lindberg, R. L. P., Uitdehaag, B. M. G., Johnson, M. R., Angelakopoulou, A., Hall, L., Richardson, J. C., Prinjha, R. K., Gass, A., Geurts, J. J. G., Kragt, J., Sombekke, M., Vrenken, H., Qualley, P., Lincoln, R. R., Gomez, R., Caillier, S. J., George, M. F., Mousavi, H., Guerrero, R., Okuda, D. T., Cree, B. A. C., Green, A. J., Waubant, E., Goodin, D. S., Pelletier, D., Matthews, P. M., Hauser, S. L., Kappos, L., Polman, C. H., & Oksenberg, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Oksenberg, Jorge R.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2008-11-14
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
767-778
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2103649136
Cited by
476
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 33
FWCI
31.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Dominican Scholar (Dominican University of California) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS026799)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, genetic susceptibility, single nucleotide polymorphisms, age of onset, disease severity, brain volume, MHC locus, chromosome 6p21.3, GPC5, heparan sulfate proteoglycans, clinical phenotype, gene ontology functional classification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Age of Onset, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Glypicans, Genome-Wide Association Study, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review