The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies
Open accessAbstract
Pleiotropy, the phenomenon of a single genetic variant influencing multiple traits, is likely widespread in the human genome. If pleiotropy arises because the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) influences one trait, which in turn influences another ('vertical pleiotropy'), then Mendelian randomization (MR) can be used to estimate the causal influence between the traits. Of prime focus among the many limitations to MR is the unprovable assumption that apparent pleiotropic associations are mediated by the exposure (i.e. reflect vertical pleiotropy), and do not arise due to SNPs influencing the two traits through independent pathways ('horizontal pleiotropy'). The burgeoning treasure trove of genetic associations yielded through genome wide association studies makes for a tantalizing prospect of phenome-wide causal inference. Recent years have seen substantial attention devoted to the problem of horizontal pleiotropy, and in this review we outline how newly developed methods can be used together to improve the reliability of MR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This pattern is consistent with a directional influence of disease liability on longevity27,64 and is also compatible with vertical pleiotropy65.”
From Genetic trade-offs in fertility and longevity explain the maintenance of disease-associated alleles in humans (2026) · cites this paper as [65]
In the citing paper
“However, confounding of the genetic variants with the outcome in a sample can be induced by population stratification, dynastic effects and assortative mating,60 violating the second IV condition.”
From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“If there are many correlated candidate variants in a gene region, then including all variants in a single analysis will typically result in numerical instability, as the analysis can be highly sensitive to small changes in the variant correlation matrix 62 .”
From Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations (2020) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089 · cited 1×
“Independence is often ensured using LDbased clumping and pruning (45).”
MethodBowden, J., Davey Smith, G., & Burgess, S. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv080 · Cited by 9,816 · cited 3×
“Here, it is assumed that on an average the random effects have zero mean and are uncorrelated with the SNP-exposure effect (55) (Appendix 1).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationBowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C., & Burgess, S. (2016) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21965 · Cited by 8,922 · cited 2×
“This can be extended to a more efficient weighted analysis, which then requires that the set of instruments accounting for 50% or more of the total weight is valid (64).”
BackgroundSelf-citationVerbanck, M., Chen, C.-Y., Neale, B., & Do, R. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7 · Cited by 8,591 · cited 3×
“based heterogeneity and outlier test is proposed within MR-PRESSO (61), which performs similarly to modified second-order”
BackgroundMethodThe MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome
Hemani, G., Zheng, J., Elsworth, B., Wade, K. H., Haberland, V., Baird, D., Laurin, C., Burgess, S., Bowden, J., Langdon, R., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.34408 · Cited by 7,959 · cited 8×
“It is also common to see leaveone-out analyses where the causal effect is re-estimated but sequentially omitting a particular instrument each time, to evaluate if any one variant is driving the analysis (8).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationDavey Smith, G., & Ebrahim, S. (2003) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyg070 · Cited by 5,882 · cited 3×
“In these cases, extending the analogy to RCTs, each instrumenting SNP is considered an independent experiment (in the sense that they independently modify the exposure), and as such the results from each experiment can be meta-analysed to give an overall estimate (7,46,47).”
MethodCommon polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
The International Schizophrenia Consortium (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08185 · Cited by 4,821
Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies
Davey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu328 · Cited by 4,677 · cited 5×
“In these cases, extending the analogy to RCTs, each instrumenting SNP is considered an independent experiment (in the sense that they independently modify the exposure), and as such the results from each experiment can be meta-analysed to give an overall estimate (7,46,47).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationGiambartolomei, C., Vukcevic, D., Schadt, E. E., Franke, L., Hingorani, A. D., Wallace, C., & Plagnol, V. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004383 · Cited by 4,261 · cited 4×
“The R/coloc (25) package uses summary data for the SNPs in a region and estimates the posterior probability of shared genetic factors by evaluating the similarity of effect size patterns across the region.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIdentification and estimation of local average treatment effects
Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951620 · Cited by 4,101
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Purcell, 2009, International Schizophrenia Consortium, Nature, 460, 748
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sanderson, E., Glymour, M. M., Holmes, M. V., Kang, H., Morrison, J., Munafò, M. R., Palmer, T., Schooling, C. M., Wallace, C., Zhao, Q., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5 · Cited by 2,229
Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations
Burgess, S., Smith, G. D., Davies, N. M., Dudbridge, F., Gill, D., Glymour, M. M., Hartwig, F. P., Holmes, M. V., Minelli, C., Relton, C. L., et al. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.1 · Cited by 1,828
Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
Bowden, J., & Holmes, M. V. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1346 · Cited by 1,683
“Unfortunately, due to the sheer number of variants that can now be easily included in such MR analyses, often with limited knowledge of their functional role, it is increasingly likely that some do not meet the IV assumptions due to a phenomenon known as horizontal pleiotropy.(14) This occurs when a SNP affects the ou…”
BackgroundSelf-citationGuidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations
Burgess, S., Davey Smith, G., Davies, N. M., Dudbridge, F., Gill, D., Glymour, M. M., Hartwig, F. P., Holmes, M. V., Minelli, C., Relton, C. L., et al. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.2 · Cited by 1,273
Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation
Carter, A. R., Sanderson, E., Hammerton, G., Richmond, R. C., Davey Smith, G., Heron, J., Taylor, A. E., Davies, N. M., & Howe, L. D. (2021) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1 · Cited by 1,215
“Bias due to pleiotropy has been discussed extensively in the literature [41, 42].”
BackgroundRichardson, T. G., Sanderson, E., Palmer, T. M., Ala-Korpela, M., Ference, B. A., Davey Smith, G., & Holmes, M. V. (2020) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003062 · Cited by 843
“To further account for potential unbalanced horizontal pleiotropy in the multivariable MR analysis, we also conducted multivariable MR-Egger analyses [56,57].”
MethodMendelian Randomization: Concepts and Scope
Richmond, R. C., & Davey Smith, G. (2022) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040501 · Cited by 841
Choi, K. W., Chen, C.-Y., Stein, M. B., Klimentidis, Y. C., Wang, M.-J., Koenen, K. C., Smoller, J. W., & Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4175 · Cited by 744
Zheng, J., Haberland, V., Baird, D., Walker, V., Haycock, P., Hurle, M., Gutteridge, A., Erola, P., Liu, Y., Luo, S., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/627398 · Cited by 812
Self-citationGuidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023
Burgess, S., Smith, G. D., Davies, N. M., Dudbridge, F., Gill, D., Glymour, M. M., Hartwig, F. P., Kutalik, Z., Holmes, M. V., Minelli, C., et al. (2023) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.3 · Cited by 747
Sanderson, E. C. M., Spiller, W., & Bowden, J. (2021) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9133 · Cited by 603
“The standard MVMR-IVW estimate is vunerable to weak instrument bias because instead of minimizing QA in (8) using the full weights defined in (9) it incorrectly assumes that σ2 Aj = σ 2 yj .”
MethodSelf-citationMorrison, J., Knoblauch, N., Marcus, J. H., Stephens, M., & He, X. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0631-4 · Cited by 587
“, ΣK = ∑ k = 0 K πkN2 βM, j θj ; 0 ; Σk , #(6)”
Genetic drug target validation using Mendelian randomisation
Schmidt, A. F., Finan, C., Gordillo‐Marañón, M., Asselbergs, F. W., Freitag, D. F., Patel, R. S., Tyl, B., Chopade, S., Faraway, R., Zwierzyna, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16969-0 · Cited by 590
Genomic and phenotypic insights from an atlas of genetic effects on DNA methylation
Min, J. L., Hemani, G., Hannon, E., Dekkers, K. F., Castillo-Fernandez, J., Luijk, R., Carnero-Montoro, E., Lawson, D. J., Burrows, K., Suderman, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00923-x · Cited by 506
Self-citationZhang, J., Dutta, D., Köttgen, A., Tin, A., Schlosser, P., Grams, M. E., Harvey, B., CKDGen Consortium, Yu, B., Boerwinkle, E., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01051-w · Cited by 373
Using Mendelian Randomization to Improve the Design of Randomized Trials
Ference, B. A., Holmes, M. V., & Smith, G. D. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040980 · Cited by 338
“Some examples of sensitivity analyses include the use ofMendelian randomization approaches that are robust to potential violation of the genetic instrumental variable arising from unbalanced horizontal pleiotropy (Hemani et al. 2018).”
MethodSelf-citationThe use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets
Minelli, C., Fabiola Del Greco, M., van der Plaat, D. A., Bowden, J., Sheehan, N. A., & Thompson, J. R. (2021) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyab084 · Cited by 333
“Simulations with no causal effect: Box plots summarising the results of all methods across the 1,000 simulations, in scenarios with no pleiotropy, balanced pleiotropy and directional pleiotropy, and for both one-sample and two-sample MR. Outliers have been removed (see text).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDeconstructing the sources of genotype-phenotype associations in humans
Young, A. I., Benonisdottir, S., Przeworski, M., & Kong, A. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax3710 · Cited by 288
Quantifying genetic effects on disease mediated by assayed gene expression levels
Yao, D. W., O’Connor, L. J., Price, A. L., & Gusev, A. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0625-2 · Cited by 278
“Colocalization tests can sometimes rule out linkage as an explanation for overlap between eQTLs and disease SNPs, but cannot rule out pleiotropy 13,36 .”
Davey Smith, G., Holmes, M. V., Davies, N. M., & Ebrahim, S. (2020) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00622-7 · Cited by 287
Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension: A Study on Bidirectional Causality
Sun, D., Zhou, T., Heianza, Y., Li, X., Fan, M., Fonseca, V. A., & Qi, L. (2019) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.314487 · Cited by 252
de Klein, N., Tsai, E. A., Vochteloo, M., Baird, D., Huang, Y., Chen, C.-Y., van Dam, S., Oelen, R., Deelen, P., Bakker, O. B., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01300-6 · Cited by 272
Rao, S., Lau, A., & So, H. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-0643 · Cited by 277
Kappelmann, N., Arloth, J., Georgakis, M. K., Czamara, D., Rost, N., Ligthart, S., Khandaker, G. M., & Binder, E. B. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3436 · Cited by 270
Causal inference with observational data: the need for triangulation of evidence
Hammerton, G., & Munafò, M. R. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720005127 · Cited by 262
“…criterion due to horizontal (or biological) pleiotropy is the main likely source of bias, and for this reason, a number of extensions to the foundational method have been developed that are robust to horizontal pleiotropy (Hekselman & Yeger-Lotem, 2020; Hemani, Bowden, & Davey Smith, 2018).”
MethodBowden, J., Hemani, G., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwy185 · Cited by 251
Self-citationCausal relationships between NAFLD, T2D and obesity have implications for disease subphenotyping
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Graham, S. E., Wang, X., Cai, D., Huang, M., Piqué-Regi, R., Dong, X. C., Chen, Y. E., Willer, C. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.006 · Cited by 252
“This risk can be reduced by using multiple genetic variants as instruments [49].”
BackgroundLocus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, Harroud, A., Stridh, P., McCauley, J. L., Saarela, J., van den Bosch, A. M. R., Engelenburg, H. J., Beecham, A. H., Alfredsson, L., Alikhani, K., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06250-x · Cited by 243
Choi, K. W., Stein, M. B., Nishimi, K. M., Ge, T., Coleman, J. R. I., Chen, C., Ratanatharathorn, A. D., Zheutlin, A. B., Dunn, E. C., Breen, G. D., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19111158 · Cited by 241
Küpers, L. K., Monnereau, C., Sharp, G. C., Yousefi, P., Salas, L. A., Ghantous, A., Page, C. M., Reese, S. E., Wilcox, A. J., Czamara, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09671-3 · Cited by 230
Storm, C. S., Kia, D. A., Almramhi, M. M., Bandrés‐Ciga, S., Finan, C., Noyce, A. J., Kaiyrzhanov, R. B., Middlehurst, B., Tan, M. M. X., Houlden, H., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26280-1 · Cited by 213
Coleman, J. R. I., Gaspar, H. A., Bryois, J., Byrne, E. M., Forstner, A. J., Holmans, P. A., de Leeuw, C. A., Mattheisen, M., McQuillin, A., Whitehead Pavlides, J. M., et al. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.10.015 · Cited by 199
“Interpreting these analyses is challenging, especially for complex traits, when the ascertainment of cases varies, and when few ( ,20) variants are used as instruments (as in the PGC BD and downsampled analyses presented) (41,64,65).”
MethodOliva, M., Demanelis, K., Lu, Y., Chernoff, M., Jasmine, F., Ahsan, H., Kibriya, M. G., Chen, L., & Pierce, B. L. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01248-z · Cited by 202
Rosoff, D. B., Smith, G. D., & Lohoff, F. W. (2021) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3554 · Cited by 186
Genome-wide analysis identifies molecular systems and 149 genetic loci associated with income
Hill, W. D., Davies, N. M., Ritchie, S. J., Skene, N., Bryois, J., Bell, S., Angelantonio, E. D., Roberts, D. J., Shen, X., Davies, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13585-5 · Cited by 186
Robust methods in Mendelian randomization via penalization of heterogeneous causal estimates
Rees, J. M. B., Wood, A., Dudbridge, F., & Burgess, S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222362 · Cited by 177
“However, heterogeneity among the causal ratio estimates may arise for a number of reasons [44].”
BackgroundRosa, M., Chignon, A., Li, Z., Boulanger, M., Arsenault, B. J., Bossé, Y., Thériault, S., & Mathieu, P. (2019) · npj Genomic Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41525-019-0097-4 · Cited by 169
Understanding the assumptions underlying Mendelian randomization
de Leeuw, C., Savage, J. E., Bucur, I. G., Heskes, T., & Posthuma, D. (2022) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-022-01038-5 · Cited by 174
“An MR approach that more closely mimics the structure of RCT however, is the use of negative control populations [13, 29].”
BackgroundMethodTaylor, D. L., Jackson, A., Narisu, N., Hemani, G., Erdos, M. R., Chines, P. S., Swift, A. J., Idol, J., Didion, J. P., Welch, R., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1814263116 · Cited by 159
“An MR result, in which the exposure instrument is associated with the outcome, can arise under four distinct models (10, 11): (i) there is no causal relationship, but a SNV that influences the outcome is in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with a SNV that influences the exposure; (ii) the exposure causally influences the o…”
BackgroundSelf-citationWithin family Mendelian randomization studies
Davies, N. M., Howe, L. J., Brumpton, B., Havdahl, A., Evans, D. M., & Davey Smith, G. (2019) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddz204 · Cited by 158
Mills, M. C., Tropf, F. C., Brazel, D. M., van Zuydam, N. R., Vaez, A., Agbessi, M. D. T., Ahsan, H., Alves, I., Andiappan, A. K., Arindrarto, W., et al. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01135-3 · Cited by 166
“20 In each case IVW 78 and MR-EGGER 79 methods were performed, with an additional round of IVW performed once a Steiger filter 80 had been applied to remove SNPs that appears to show a primary association with the outcome rather than the exposure.”
Self-citationCausal associations between modifiable risk factors and the Alzheimer's phenome
Andrews, S. J., Fulton‐Howard, B., O'Reilly, P., Marcora, E., Goate, A. M., & collaborators of the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium (2021) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25918 · Cited by 156
“Third, we cannot completely rule out violations of the independence and the exclusion restriction assumption, particularly in regard to pleiotropy.(53) Nevertheless, we used several methods to infer robust causal estimates, including outlier removal using MR-PRESSO and WMBE, WME, and MR-Egger sensitivity analyses.”
MethodAnderson, E. L., Howe, L. D., Wade, K. H., Ben‐Shlomo, Y., Hill, W. D., Deary, I. J., Sanderson, E. C. M., Zheng, J., Korologou‐Linden, R., Stergiakouli, E., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz280 · Cited by 153
Self-citationYao, S., Zhang, M., Dong, S., Wang, J.-H., Zhang, K., Guo, J., Guo, Y., & Yang, T. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01412-9 · Cited by 144
Yu, Z., Coresh, J., Qi, G., Grams, M., Boerwinkle, E., Snieder, H., Teumer, A., Pattaro, C., Köttgen, A., Chatterjee, N., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.044 · Cited by 135
Seyedsalehi, A., Warrier, V., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Perry, B. I., Burgess, S., & Murray, G. K. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac392 · Cited by 141
“42 were dropped from the analysis.(89) Details of the SNPs used as instruments in each MR analysis (including proxies for SNPs not available in the outcome datasets) are available in the Supplementary material.”
MethodYuan, Z., Zhu, H., Zeng, P., Yang, S., Sun, S., Yang, C., Liu, J., & Zhou, X. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17668-6 · Cited by 129
Cho, Y., Haycock, P., Sanderson, E. C. M., Gaunt, T. R., Zheng, J., Morris, A. P., Smith, G. D., & Hemani, G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14452-4 · Cited by 139
Self-citationGormley, M., Dudding, T., Sanderson, E. C. M., Martin, R. M., Thomas, S. J., Tyrrell, J., Ness, A., Brennan, P., Munafo, M. R., Pring, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19822-6 · Cited by 133
Genetic Association of Albuminuria with Cardiometabolic Disease and Blood Pressure
Haas, M. E., Aragam, K. G., Emdin, C. A., Bick, A. G., Hemani, G., Smith, G. D., & Kathiresan, S. (2018) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.004 · Cited by 131
Self-citationDebiased inverse-variance weighted estimator in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization
Ye, T., Shao, J., & Kang, H. (2021) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/20-aos2027 · Cited by 139
Hu, X., Zhao, J., Lin, Z., Wang, Y., Peng, H., Zhao, H., Wan, X., & Yang, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2106858119 · Cited by 132
“To perform causal inference with genetic data, it is indispensable 34 to distinguish two major confounding factors: pleiotropy [8] and sample structure [9, 10].”
BackgroundMethodKavousi, M., Bos, M. M., Barnes, H. J., Cardenas, C. L. L., Wong, D., Lu, H., Hodonsky, C. J., Landsmeer, L. P. L., Turner, A. W., Kho, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01518-4 · Cited by 124
Triangulating Evidence through the Inclusion of Genetically Informed Designs
Munafò, M. R., Higgins, J. P. T., & Smith, G. D. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040659 · Cited by 125
Self-citationPolygenic Mendelian RandomizationPreprint
Dudbridge, F. (2020) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a039586 · Cited by 110
Sanderson, E., Richardson, T. G., Hemani, G., & Davey Smith, G. (2021) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyaa288 · Cited by 115
“A key assumption for MR to give consistent estimates of the causal effect of an exposure on the outcome is that the SNPs used as instruments are not associated with the outcome other than through the exposure.(3) One way in which this assumption may be violated is through population stratification, where structure in…”
BackgroundSelf-citationKuppa, A., Tripathi, H., Al‐Darraji, A., Tarhuni, W. M., & Abdel‐Latif, A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24119129 · Cited by 116
Yoshiji, S., Butler‐Laporte, G., Lu, T., Willett, J., Su, C., Nakanishi, T., Morrison, D., Chen, Y., Liang, K. Y. H., Hultström, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-023-00742-w · Cited by 116
The genetics of depression: successful genome-wide association studies introduce new challenges
Ormel, J., Hartman, C. A., & Snieder, H. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0450-5 · Cited by 120
Education leads to a more physically active lifestyle: Evidence based on Mendelian randomization
Kari, J. T., Viinikainen, J., Böckerman, P., Tammelin, T., Pitkänen, N., Lehtimäki, T. J., Pahkala, K., Hirvensalo, M. H., Raitakari, O. T., & Pehkonen, J. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.13653 · Cited by 120
Coffee Consumption and Kidney Function: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Kennedy, O. J., Pirastu, N., Poole, R., Fallowfield, J. A., Hayes, P. C., Grzeszkowiak, E. J., Taal, M. W., Wilson, J. F., Parkes, J., & Roderick, P. J. (2019) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.025 · Cited by 111
Polimanti, R., Peterson, R. E., Ong, J.-S., MacGregor, S., Edwards, A. C., Clarke, T.-K., Frank, J., Gerring, Z., Gillespie, N. A., Lind, P. A., et al. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719000667 · Cited by 108
Cao, Y., Yang, Y., Hu, Q., & Wei, G. (2023) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-023-04474-z · Cited by 109
“Previous studies have suggested that significant MR outcomes may arise from a locus in which SNPs are in close linkage disequilibrium and in which the SNP-exposure and SNP-outcome associations arise from two different causal SNPs, and therefore may lead to inferred false positive results [44].”
BackgroundGenetics of substance use disorders in the era of big data
Gelernter, J. E., & Polimanti, R. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00377-1 · Cited by 107
Cardiovascular diseases and depression: A meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization analysis
Zeng, J., Qiu, Y., Yang, C., Fan, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, C., Zhu, S., Long, Y., Hashimoto, K., Chang, L., et al. (2025) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-025-03003-2 · Cited by 122
Sanderson, E. C. M., Richardson, T. G., Morris, T., Tilling, K. M., & Smith, G. D. (2022) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010290 · Cited by 100
“studies in the results presented here, such as biases due to pleiotropy or collider bias.[25, 31, 42] These results should therefore be taken as an illustration of the application and interpretation of the methods discussed.”
MethodTreur, J. L., Demontis, D., Smith, G. D., Sallis, H., Richardson, T. G., Wiers, R. W., Børglum, A. D., Verweij, K. J. H., & Munafò, M. R. (2021) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12849 · Cited by 102
Thyroid function, sex hormones and sexual function: a Mendelian randomization study
Kjaergaard, A. D., Marouli, E., Papadopoulou, A., Deloukas, P., Kuś, A., Sterenborg, R. B. T. M., Teumer, A., Burgess, S., Åsvold, B. O., Chasman, D. I., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-021-00721-z · Cited by 111
Genetics of common cerebral small vessel disease
Bordes, C., Sargurupremraj, M., Mishra, A., & Debette, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-021-00592-8 · Cited by 108
Jiang, R., Noble, S., Rosenblatt, M., Dai, W., Ye, J., Liu, S., Qi, S., Calhoun, V. D., Jing Sui (Beijing Normal University), my correct affiliation is beijing normal university, N. Q. U. O. S. A. T., & Scheinost, D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48827-8 · Cited by 106
“Leave-one-SNP-out analysis was performed to assess if the overall effect was driven by any single SNP. MR-PRESSO was employedtodetectoutliersandweremovedtheseoutlierstogenerate reported estimates 70 .”
Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review
Spiga, F., Gibson, M., Dawson, S., Tilling, K. M., Smith, G. D., Munafo, M. R., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2022) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyac149 · Cited by 96
Zhao, H., Rasheed, H., Nøst, T. H., Cho, Y., Liu, Y., Bhatta, L., Bhattacharya, A., Initiative, G. B. M.-A., Hemani, G., Smith, G. D., et al. (2022) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100195 · Cited by 90
Self-citationHamel, A. R., Yan, W., Rouhana, J. M., Monavarfeshani, A., Jiang, X., Mehta, P. A., Advani, J., Luo, Y., Liang, Q., Rajasundaram, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44380-y · Cited by 100
“We provided additional support for three quarters of the colocalizing e/sGenes using Mendelian randomization 43,51,52 , which tests for horizontal pleiotropy, not accounted for by Bayesian colocalization analysis 53,54 .”
MethodSpiller, W., Slichter, D., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy204 · Cited by 90
“We recommend care be taken in examining such pathways and suggest MRGxE be implemented as one component of a series of sensitivity analyses, as with other such approaches.(4)”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationMendelian Randomization Studies of Coffee and Caffeine Consumption
Cornelis, M. C., & Munafo, M. R. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10101343 · Cited by 89
Sproviero, W., Winchester, L., Newby, D., Fernandes, M., Shi, L., Goodday, S. M., Prats-Uribe, A., Alhambra, D. P., Buckley, N. J., & Nevado-Holgado, A. J. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.12.015 · Cited by 86
Perry, B. I., Burgess, S., Jones, H. J., Zammit, S., Upthegrove, R., Mason, A. M., Day, F. R., Langenberg, C., Wareham, N. J., Jones, P. B., et al. (2021) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003455 · Cited by 91
“This could be via, for example, a common causal basis (panel A in S1 Methods) or via vertical (mediating) pleiotropy [27] (panel B in S1 Methods).”
BackgroundInfluentialBahls, M., Leitzmann, M. F., Karch, A., Teumer, A., Dörr, M., Felix, S. B., Meisinger, C., Baumeister, S. E., & Baurecht, H. (2021) · Clinical Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00392-021-01846-7 · Cited by 91
“To detect and correct for outliers of the IVW linear regression, we applied the MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MRPRESSO) method [34, 38].”
BackgroundMethodZhang, J., Chen, Z., Pärna, K., van Zon, S. K. R., Snieder, H., & Thio, C. H. L. (2022) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-022-05705-6 · Cited by 90
“To evaluate potential directional horizontal pleiotropy, we performed MR-Egger regression to assess whether the mean value of the Egger intercept was non-zero, in which case pleiotropy could be directional [39].”
MethodThe use of Mendelian randomisation to identify causal cancer risk factors: promise and limitations
Gala, H., & Tomlinson, I. P. M. (2020) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.5421 · Cited by 86
“The only current solution to this problem is to attain a better understanding of the way SNPs affect biological pathways that are linked to the outcome.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDNA methylation biomarkers of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular disease
Fernández‐Sanlés, A., Sayols-Baixeras, S., Subirana, I., Sentı́, M., Pérez-Fernández, S., Moura, M. D. C., Esteller, M., Marrugat, J., & Elosúa, R. (2021) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-021-01078-6 · Cited by 84
“Although a non-causal relationship was suggested, this must be interpreted with caution as there was a single genetic instrumental variable, and we cannot discard that the meQTL is in linkage disequilibrium with the causal variant for CHD, reverse causation or horizontal pleiotropy using this framework [28, 29].”
MethodYang, Q., Sanderson, E., Tilling, K., Borges, M. C., & Lawlor, D. A. (2019) · doi:10.1101/19009605 · Cited by 85
“Without this understanding it is challenging to understand whether the outlying SNP is introducing horizontal pleiotropy (and might be best removed or down weighted) or is the most biologically reliable SNP and, therefore, the most credible instrument in the analysis [10].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRichardson, T. G., Hemani, G., Gaunt, T. R., Relton, C. L., & Smith, G. D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13921-9 · Cited by 84
“Firstly, we evaluate the relationship between gene expression across many tissues and pleiotropy; the phenomenon whereby a gene in fl u-ences variation in multiple traits 16 .”
MethodSelf-citationZheng, J., Brion, M., Kemp, J. P., Warrington, N. M., Borges, M. C., Hemani, G., Richardson, T. G., Rasheed, H., Qiao, Z., Haycock, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.3989 · Cited by 82
Self-citationBaird, D. A., Liu, J. Z., Zheng, J., Sieberts, S. K., Perumal, T. M., Elsworth, B., Richardson, T. G., Chen, C., Carrasquillo, M. M., Allen, M., et al. (2021) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009224 · Cited by 80
“instrument is associated with risk factors that act through the same pathway, and does not violate the assumptions of MR [17,18].”
Self-citationTwo‐Sample Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using R
Rasooly, D., & Peloso, G. M. (2021) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.335 · Cited by 81
“In vertical pleiotropy, a genetic variant is associated with a risk factor that exerts a downstream causal effect on another, potentially closely related risk factor, which then exerts a causal effect on the outcome (Hemani et al., 2018; Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWang, Y., Yang, L., Deng, Y.-Q., Yan, S., Luo, L.-S., Chen, P., & Zeng, X. (2022) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-022-03722-y · Cited by 89
“05, and we used a random-effect inverse-variance weighted (IVW) model as the main analysis method [33].”
MethodWang, Y., Ye, C., Kong, L., Zheng, J., Xu, M., Xu, Y., Li, M., Zhao, Z., Lu, J., Chen, Y., et al. (2022) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.122.20286 · Cited by 85
“…30643251 Coffee consumption SD (1% change) 375 833 European UK Biobank Zhong et al 2019 31046077 Total household income SD 397 751 European UK Biobank Hemani et al 2018 29846171 BF% indicates body fat percentage; BMI, body mass index; COGENT, Cognitive Genomics Consortium; DBP, diastolic blood…”
BackgroundMagnus, M. C., Guyatt, A. L., Lawn, R. B., Wyss, A. B., Trajanoska, K., Küpers, L. K., Rivadeneira, F., Tobin, M. D., London, S. J., Lawlor, D. A., et al. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01515-y · Cited by 81
“, presence of interactions or nonlinear effects) [41].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSex hormone–binding globulin: biomarker and hepatokine?
Simons, P. I. H. G., Valkenburg, O., Stehouwer, C. D. A., & Brouwers, M. C. G. J. (2021) · Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2021.05.002 · Cited by 82
Hazelwood, E., Sanderson, E. C. M., Tan, V. Y., Ruth, K. S., Frayling, T. M., Dimou, N. L., Gunter, M. J., Dossus, L., Newton, C. L., Ryan, N. A. J., et al. (2022) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02322-3 · Cited by 83
“For traits instrumented by a single SNP, the Wald ratio was used to generate effect estimates 172 and the delta method was used to approximate standard errors [45].”
MethodKwok, M. K., Kawachi, I. I., Rehkopf, D. H., & Schooling, C. M. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01831-3 · Cited by 80
“However, these studies are Table 3 Association of genetically predicted cortisol (P value 5 × 10−6 and r2 0.001) based on 3 separate data sources (CORtisol NETwork (CORNET) consortium, Shin GWAS, and Long GWAS) with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) based on the DIAbetes Meta-ANalysis of Trans-Ethnic association studies (DIAMANT…”
BackgroundInfluentialDavyson, E., Shen, X., Gadd, D. A., Bernabeu, E., Hillary, R. F., McCartney, D. L., Adams, M. J., Marioni, R. E., & McIntosh, A. M. (2023) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.01.027 · Cited by 80
“This indicates that the instrumental variable in MR exhibits horizontal pleiotropy on the outcome (a direct violation of the exchangeability assumption for MR), thus weakening the evidence for causality (82,83).”
Gong, J., Wang, F., Xiao, B., Panjwani, N., Fan, L., Keenan, K., Avolio, J., Esmaeili, M., Zhang, L., He, G., et al. (2019) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008007 · Cited by 79
Sex hormone binding globulin and risk of breast cancer: a Mendelian randomization study
Dimou, N. L., Papadimitriou, N., Gill, D., Christakoudi, S., Murphy, N., Gunter, M. J., Travis, R. C., Key, T. J., Fortner, R. T., Haycock, P., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz107 · Cited by 78
“rs12150660) has been also associated at a genome-wide significance level with testosterone concentrations in men,(55) but this variant is located in the SHBG gene, and will likely lead to vertical (not horizontal) pleiotropy, not violating thus the results of the present study.(56) In addition, most known genetic sign…”
ResultMillard, L. A. C., Davies, N. M., Tilling, K. M., Gaunt, T. R., & Smith, G. D. (2019) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007951 · Cited by 78
“The MR-Egger, weighted median and MBE approaches are complementary, each depending on distinct assumptions about instrument validity [73].”
BackgroundYang, J., He, X., Li, Q., Zhao, B., Fan, Y., Gao, F., Yan, B., Zhu, F., & Ma, X. (2021) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103948 · Cited by 77
Zhang, Y., Li, D., Zhu, Z., Chen, S., Lu, M., Cao, P., Chen, T., Li, S., Xue, S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2022.06.010 · Cited by 77
Lovegrove, C. E., Howles, S., Furniss, D., & Holmes, M. V. (2024) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1093/jbmr/zjae136 · Cited by 80
“48 Balanced horizontal pleiotropy (the deviation of a variant’s estimate from the mean estimate is independent of its effect on the exposure) may be accounted for if the random effects do not systematically affect the outcome.”
BackgroundBaumeister, S., Freuer, D., Nolde, M., Kocher, T., Baurecht, H., Khazaei, Y., Ehmke, B., & Holtfreter, B. (2021) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13544 · Cited by 76
“…of the individual SNP effects using the Cochran Q and I GX2 statistics, applied the MR Egger intercept test of directional pleiotropy, the leave-one-out MR analysis to assess whether the MR estimate was driven by a single SNP, and applied various pleiotropy-robust MR methods (Hemani et al., 2018).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemani, G., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol
- Corresponding author
- Hemani, Gibran
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-05-16
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- R2
- Pages
- R195-R208
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- PMC
- PMC6061876
- OpenAlex
- W2810852503
- Cited by
- 1,496
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 129 · 2025: 266 · 2024: 422 · 2023: 209 · 2022: 169 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (208806/Z/17/Z)
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12013/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
- Keywords
- pleiotropy, Mendelian randomization, horizontal pleiotropy, single nucleotide polymorphisms, causal inference, phenome-wide association study, genetic variants
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Human, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Genetic Pleiotropy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review