Cited by 67Muscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

Exogenous Oxidation of Isomaltulose Is Lower than That of Sucrose during Exercise in Men

Open access
Achten, Juul, Jentjens, Roy L., Brouns, Fred, Jeukendrup, Asker E.·2007·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Isomaltulose (ISO) is a disaccharide that is slowly digested, resulting in a slow availability for absorption. The aim of this study was to compare the blood substrate responses and exogenous carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation rates from orally ingested sucrose (SUC) and ISO during moderate intensity exercise. We hypothesized that the oxidation of ISO is lower compared with SUC, resulting in lower plasma glucose and insulin concentrations and subsequent lower CHO and higher fat oxidation rates. Ten trained men [maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), 64 +/- 1 mL/(kg body mass.min)] cycled on 3 occasions for 150 min at 59 +/- 2% VO(2)max and consumed either water (WAT) or 1 of 2 CHO solutions providing 1.1 g/min of CHO in the form of either SUC or ISO. Peak exogenous CHO oxidation rates were higher (P < 0.05) during the SUC trial (0.92 +/- 0.03 g/min) than during the ISO trial (0.54 +/- 0.05 g/min). Total endogenous CHO oxidation over the final 90 min of exercise was lower (P < 0.05) in the SUC trial (107 +/- 10 g) than in the WAT (137 +/- 7 g) and ISO (127 +/- 9 g) trials. Fat oxidation was higher during the WAT trial than during the SUC and ISO trials. ISO resulted in a lower plasma insulin response at 30 min compared with SUC, whereas the glucose response did not differ between the 2 CHO. Oxidation of ingested ISO was significantly less than that of SUC, most likely due to the lower rate of digestion of ISO. A lower CHO delivery and a small difference in plasma insulin may have resulted in higher endogenous CHO use and higher fat oxidation during the ISO trial than during the SUC trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/137.5.1143

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A ratio of 1-1.2 maltodextrin to 0.8-1.0 fructose seems to support the greatest rates of carbohydrate oxidation during exercise.

    “These studies generally indicate a ratio of 1–1.2 for maltodextrin to 0.8–1.0 fructose seems to support the greatest rates of carbohydrate oxidation during exercise.”

    From ISSN exercise &amp; sports nutrition review update: research &amp; recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Introduction (page not provided) reports that combinations of carbohydrates using different digestion and transport systems can reach high oxidation rates during exercise. It does not identify a maltodextrin-to-fructose ratio of 1–1.2 to 0.8–1.0 or establish that this ratio produces the greatest rates; the Discussion instead compares isomaltulose with sucrose. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Combinations of glucose and sucrose or maltodextrin and fructose promote greater exogenous rates of carbohydrate oxidation when compared to single sources of carbohydrate.

    “Interestingly, combinations of glucose and sucrose or maltodextrin and fructose have been reported to promote greater exogenous rates of carbohydrate oxidation when compared to situations when single sources of carbohydrate are ingested [55–63].”

    From ISSN exercise &amp; sports nutrition review update: research &amp; recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Introduction reports that combinations of carbohydrates using different digestion and transport systems can reach exogenous oxidation rates of about 1.7 g/min, compared with up to 1 g/min for the individual carbohydrates it discusses. It does not identify or test the specific glucose–sucrose and maltodextrin–fructose combinations named in the claim; this study compares sucrose with isomaltulose. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Such responses have been attributed to excitation of reward and motor control centres in the brain and increased excitability of the corticomotor pathways via oral receptor stimulation.

    “Such responses have been attributed to the excitation of reward and motor control centres in the brain 68 and an increased excitability of the corticomotor pathways 69 via oral receptor stimulation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Craig H. Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1957;12:133-49.
  2. Horowitz J, Mora-Rodriguez R, Byerley L, Coyle E. Lipolytic supression following carbohydrate ingestion limits fat oxidation during exercise. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:E768-E75.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achten, J., Jentjens, R. L., Brouns, F., & Jeukendrup, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Jeukendrup, Asker E.
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
137
Issue
5
Pages
1143-1148
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160405802
Cited by
67
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
isomaltulose, sucrose, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation, fat oxidation, plasma insulin, plasma glucose, physical activity, endurance exercise
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Blood Glucose, Energy Metabolism, Fats, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Humans, Insulin, Isomaltose, Male, Osmolar Concentration, Oxidation-Reduction, Solutions, Sucrose, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies, Carbohydrate Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review