Cited by 81Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The slight spin of the old stellar halo

Open access
Deason, Alis J., Belokurov, Vasily, Koposov, Sergey E., Gómez, Facundo A., Grand, Robert J., Marinacci, Federico, Pakmor, Rüdiger·2017·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We combine Gaia data release 1 astrometry with Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) images taken some ∼10–15 years earlier, to measure proper motions of stars in the halo of our Galaxy. The SDSS–Gaia proper motions have typical statistical errors of 2 mas yr−1 down to r ∼ 20 mag, and are robust to variations with magnitude and colour. Armed with this exquisite set of halo proper motions, we identify RR Lyrae, blue horizontal branch (BHB), and K giant stars in the halo, and measure their net rotation with respect to the Galactic disc. We find evidence for a gently rotating prograde signal (〈Vϕ〉 ∼ 5–25 km s−1) in the halo stars, which shows little variation with Galactocentric radius out to 50 kpc. The average rotation signal for the three populations is 〈Vϕ〉 = 14 ± 2 ± 10 (syst.) km s−1. There is also tentative evidence for a kinematic correlation with metallicity, whereby the metal richer BHB and K giant stars have slightly stronger prograde rotation than the metal poorer stars. Using the Auriga simulation suite, we find that the old (T >10 Gyr) stars in the simulated haloes exhibit mild prograde rotation, with little dependence on radius or metallicity, in general agreement with the observations. The weak halo rotation suggests that the Milky Way has a minor in situ halo component, and has undergone a relatively quiet accretion history.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stx1301

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Auriga simulations successfully reproduce many properties of observed central and satellite galaxies, such as stellar masses and star formation rates of spirals, density and kinematics of stellar haloes, and the luminosity function of MW satellites.

    “The Auriga simulations successfully reproduce many properties of observed central and satellite galaxies, such as the stellar masses and star formation rates of spirals (Grand et al. 2017; Marinacci et al. 2017), the density and kinematics of stellar haloes (Deason et al. 2017; Monachesi et al. 2019b), and the luminosity function of MW satellites (Simpson et al. 2018).”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Deason et al. 2017

    Deason et al. is cited alongside Monachesi et al. for the density and kinematics of stellar haloes, not for the other properties in the sentence. Section 6.2 reports that the rotation of old Auriga halo stars broadly agrees with observations, supporting the kinematics portion. Section 6.1 says this paper focuses on rotation and leaves a more general analysis of simulated halo properties to a future study; it does not establish agreement in stellar-halo density. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gómez F. A. et al., 2017a, preprint (arXiv:1704.08261) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., Koposov, S. E., Gómez, F. A., Grand, R. J., Marinacci, F., & Pakmor, R.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (DE)
Corresponding author
Deason, Alis J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2017-05-25
Volume
470
Issue
2
Pages
1259-1273
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2619396253
Cited by
81
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Space Agency
  • European Commission (308024, 2007–2013, FP/2007/2013)
  • Durham University (ST/L00075X/1, ST/K00087X/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/K003267/1, ST/H008519/1)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FP/2007-2013)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/H008519, ST/K00042X/1, ST/N000927/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/ K00087X/1, ST/L00075X/1, ST/N004493/1, ST/L00075X, ST/H008519/1, ST/K003267/1)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (308024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
Galactic halo, halo rotation, prograde rotation, stellar proper motions, RR Lyrae stars, blue horizontal branch stars, K giants, metallicity, Auriga simulations, Milky Way accretion history, Gaia astrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review