CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 174Motor Control and AdaptationMultisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How the brain represents the body: insights from neurophysiology and psychology.

Graziano, Michael S A, Botvinick, Matthew M·2002·Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198510697.003.0006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Abstract. To reach for the computer mouse, to sit upright in a chair or hold a journal in order to read it, indeed, to do most of the actions that we commonly perform, we rely on a representation of the spatial con1guration of the body. How and where in the brain is the body represented and what are the psychological properties of this body schema? In this article we review 1rst the neurophysiology and then the psychology of the body representation. One 1nding that has emerged from both approaches is that the body representation is not merely a registration of proprioceptive inputs about joint angle. Instead, the brain contains a sophisticated model of the body that is continually updated on the basis of multimodal input including vision, somesthesis, and motor feedback. Neurophysiological studies in the monkey brain show that parietal area 5 is a critical node for processing the body’s con1guration. Neurons in area 5 combine signals from different modalities in order to represent limb position and movement. Psychological studies show that the body schema is used to cross-reference between different senses, as a basis for spatial cognition and for movement planning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198510697.003.0006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Graziano, M. S. A., & Botvinick, M. M.
ORCID
Venue
Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Published
2002-02-07
Pages
136-157
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198510697.003.0006
OpenAlex
W4388285282
Cited by
174
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
representation of the body, body schema, proprioception, multimodal integration, cross-modal correspondence, spatial cognition, motor planning, limb position, somatosensory perception, vision, motor feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review