Cited by 117Face Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Medial prefrontal dissociations during processing of trait diagnostic and nondiagnostic person information

Open access
Mitchell, Jason P., Cloutier, Jasmin, Banaji, Mahzarin R., Macrae, C. Neil·2006·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that perceivers spontaneously extract trait-specific information from the behaviour of others. However, little is known about whether perceivers spontaneously engage in the same depth of social-cognitive processing for all person information or reserve such processing specifically for information that conveys diagnostic clues about another person's dispositions. Moreover, a question remains as to whether the processing of such nondiagnostic information can be affected by perceivers' explicit goal to consider another's dispositions or not. To examine processing of diagnostic and nondiagnostic social information as a function of perceivers' explicit social-cognitive goals, participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning while performing social (impression formation) or non-social orienting tasks using statements that conveyed either diagnostic or nondiagnostic information about the target's personality traits. Replicating two earlier studies, results identified a region of dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) that was preferentially activated by impression formation. Interestingly, no difference between trait-diagnostic and nondiagnostic information was observed when participants had the explicit goal of forming an impression, but a substantial effect of diagnosticity emerged when task instructions oriented them away from considering the target as a social agent. These results suggest that trait-nondiagnostic information is not subject to spontaneous social-cognitive processing, but that such processing may nevertheless occur when perceivers have the explicit goal to use that information to form an impression of a target.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsl007

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trait-implying actions lead to greater activation in the mPFC than non-trait-implying actions, suggesting spontaneous trait inferences.

    “Tasks that require participants to make unrelated judgments (e.g., memory tasks) suggest that trait inferences were also made spontaneously (see ''SSI'' in Table I) for trait-implying actions compared to non trait-implying actions, as the former lead to greater activation in the mPFC [Iacoboni et al., 2004; Mitchell et al., 2006; Todorov et al., 2007].”

    From Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Mitchell et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, J. P., Cloutier, J., Banaji, M. R., & Macrae, C. N.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Jason P.
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
49-55
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2156446734
Cited by
117
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
impression formation, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, person perception, social orienting
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review