Cited by 112Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 9 of the 39 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Sex-specific effects of intranasal oxytocin on autonomic nervous system and emotional responses to couple conflict

Open access
Ditzen, Beate, Nater, Urs M., Schaer, Marcel, La Marca, Roberto, Bodenmann, Guy, Ehlert, Ulrike, Heinrichs, Markus·2013·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Unhappy couple relationships are associated with impaired individual health, an effect thought to be mediated through ongoing couple conflicts. Little is known, however, about the underlying mechanisms regulating psychobiological stress, and particularly autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity, during negative couple interaction. In this study, we tested the effects of the neuropeptide oxytocin on ANS reactivity during couple conflict in a standardized laboratory paradigm. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 47 heterosexual couples (total n = 94) received oxytocin or placebo intranasally prior to instructed couple conflict. Participants' behavior was videotaped and salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), a measure of sympathetic activity, and emotional arousal were repeatedly measured during the experiment. Oxytocin significantly reduced sAA during couple conflict in women, whereas men showed increases in sAA levels (sex × group interaction: B = -49.36, t = -2.68, P = 0.009). In men, these increases were related to augmented emotional arousal (r = 0.286, P = 0.028) and more positive behavior (r = 0.291, P = 0.026), whereas there was no such association in women. Our results imply sex-specific effects of oxytocin on sympathetic activity, to negative couple interaction, with the neuropeptide reducing sAA responses and emotional arousal in women while increasing them in men.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a double-blind placebo-controlled study of 47 heterosexual couples, intranasal oxytocin before a couple conflict produced sex-specific effects on salivary alpha-amylase (sAA): women showed reduced sAA, while men showed increased sAA. In men, increased sAA was associated with higher emotional arousal and more positive observed behavior, whereas no such associations appeared in women.

Key findings

  • A significant sex × group interaction emerged for sAA increases from pre- to post-conflict (B = −49.36, t = −2.68, P = 0.009): women receiving oxytocin showed decreases in sAA compared with placebo, whereas men receiving oxytocin showed increases.
  • Repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed a time × sex × group effect on sAA over time (F = 2.581(5,37), P = 0.042); there was no main oxytocin effect over time (time × group: F = 0.857(5,37), P = 0.519) and no overall sex difference over time (time × sex: F = 0.611(5,37), P = 0.692).
  • Emotional arousal after conflict also showed a sex × group interaction (B = −0.73, t = −2.12, P = 0.037): men with oxytocin reported higher emotional arousal, while women with oxytocin reported lower emotional arousal compared with placebo.
  • In men, emotional arousal was positively correlated with increases in sAA (r = 0.286, P = 0.028) and with more positive observed behavior during conflict (r = 0.291, P = 0.026); in women, there were no associations of sAA with emotional arousal or observed conflict behavior.

Methods

  • Double-blind, placebo-controlled design with 47 heterosexual couples (total n = 94), aged 20–50 years, married or cohabiting for at least 1 year; exclusion criteria included smoking, chronic mental or physical illness, medication intake, and for women hormonal contraceptives, pregnancy, or breastfeeding.
  • Couples self-administered either 40 IU intranasal oxytocin (Syntocinon Spray) or placebo, assigned at the couple level; 45 min later they discussed a chosen conflict issue for 10 min while being videotaped.
  • sAA was repeatedly measured from saliva at baseline (−50 min), −20 min, −1 min, and +10, +20, +30, +45 min; emotional arousal was assessed with a 14-item questionnaire, behavior was coded with CAOS, and analyses used hierarchical linear modeling, repeated-measures ANOVA, and correlations.

Limitations

  • Stated: causal interpretation is limited because continuous data sampling during the actual conflict was not possible; effects of a single neuropharmacological challenge may differ from endogenous oxytocin mechanisms; possible vasopressin receptor activity and interactions with steroid hormones were not investigated.
  • Stated: the sample included relatively happy couples who were not seeking treatment, so differential effects in unhappy relationships are beyond the scope of the study.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (47 couples; sex/group cells of n = 23 or 24), and the HLM model explained only 3.1% of variance in sAA increases, limiting precision and generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nss083

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

9 of 39 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 21 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little is known about the underlying mechanisms regulating psychobiological stress, particularly ANS reactivity, during negative couple interaction.

    “Little is known, however, about the underlying mechanisms regulating psychobiological stress, and particularly autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity, during negative couple interaction.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Quiescence is associated with parasympathetic activity, and approach is characterized by SNS activity.

    “Whereas quiescence is assumed to be associated with parasympathetic activity, approach would be characterized by SNS activity.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Metadata

Authors
Ditzen, B., Nater, U. M., Schaer, M., La Marca, R., Bodenmann, G., Ehlert, U., & Heinrichs, M.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2012-07-27
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
897-902
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2121447055
Cited by
112
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • ZHAW Digital Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (108392, 114788)
  • Universität Zürich (PP001-114788)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
oxytocin, couple conflict, autonomic nervous system, salivary amylase, sympathetic activity, emotional arousal, sex differences, intranasal administration, interpersonal stress, romantic relationships
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Conflict, Psychological, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocin, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review