Cited by 60Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Coping style moderates the effect of intranasal oxytocin on the mood response to interpersonal stress

Cardoso, Christopher, Linnen, Anne-Marie, Joober, Ridha, Ellenbogen, Mark A.·2012·Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests self-administration of intranasal oxytocin may facilitate social interaction by attenuating the stress response to interpersonal conflict. Currently, no published research has documented whether intraindividual factors moderate the effect of intranasal oxytocin on the emotional response to stress. The aim of the present study was to determine whether coping style moderates the effect of intranasal oxytocin on mood in response to an interpersonal stressor in healthy men and women. In a double-blind placebo-controlled experiment, 100 undergraduate students (50 women) participated in the Yale Interpersonal Stressor (YIPS: Stroud, Tanofsky-Kraff, Wilfley, & Salovey, 2000), a live social rejection paradigm. Prior to the YIPS, participants were randomly assigned to self-administer either intranasal oxytocin (24 IU) or a placebo. Coping was measured using the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Multiple regression analyses predicting stress-related changes in anxiety revealed a significant Drug × Emotion-oriented coping × Sex interaction [pr2 = .06, b = 6.074, t(91) = -2.526, p = .014]. Follow-up analyses using simple slopes revealed self-administration of intranasal oxytocin reduced anxiety in response to the YIPS relative to the placebo in women high in emotion-oriented coping [b = 4.487, t(91) = 2.09, p < .05], but not in women low in emotion-oriented coping, or men. The results suggest that intraindividual factors modulate the effect of intranasal oxytocin on the affective response to stress. Intranasal oxytocin appears to be particularly beneficial to women who endorse high levels of emotion-oriented coping, who may be vulnerable to the negative impact of stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025763

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some data suggest women may be more responsive to oxytocin than men, but a recent meta-analysis indicated data are insufficient to analyze gender differences even in trust and facial recognition.

    “Some data suggest that women may be more responsive to OT than males (41), but a recent meta-analysis indicated data are insufficient to analyze gender differences even in the best studied areas, trust and facial recognition (40).”
  • One new hypothesis regarding intranasal oxytocin's effects on human behavior suggests that intranasal oxytocin attenuates stress responses more effectively for those with vulnerabilities such as poor coping and emotion regulation skills compared to those equipped with more adaptive stress responses.

    “As a result, one new hypothesis regarding intranasal oxytocin’s effects on human behavior suggests that intranasal oxytocin attenuates stress responses more effectively for those with vulnerabilities such as poor coping and emotion regulation skills compared to those equipped with more adaptive stress responses (Bartz et al., 2010; Cardoso et al., 2012; Quirin et al., 2011).”
  • Intranasal oxytocin is less likely to influence already adaptive stress responses, whereas individuals with more challenging interpersonal histories who are more prone to maladaptive social stress reactivity are more likely to reap intranasal oxytocin's benefits.

    “Perhaps our findings, in combination with those from previous studies (Bartz et al., 2010; Cardoso et al., 2012), indicate that intranasal oxytocin is less likely to influence already adaptive stress responses, whereas individuals with more challenging interpersonal histories who are more prone to maladaptive social stress reactivity are more likely to reap intranasal oxytocin’s benefits.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardoso, C., Linnen, A.-M., Joober, R., & Ellenbogen, M. A.
Affiliations
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2012-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
84-91
ISSN
  • 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2293
OpenAlex
W2055411431
Cited by
60
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, coping styles, emotion-focused coping, interpersonal stress, social rejection, anxiety, mood, sex differences, moderation, stress response
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Oxytocin, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review