Cited by 24Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryHallucinations in medical conditions

Stronger top-down and weaker bottom-up frontotemporal connections during sensory learning are associated with severity of psychotic phenomena

Open access
Dzafic, Ilvana, Larsen, Kit M, Darke, Hayley, Pertile, Holly, Carter, Olivia, Sundram, Suresh, Garrido, Marta I·2021·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Recent theories in computational psychiatry propose that unusual perceptual experiences and delusional beliefs may emerge as a consequence of aberrant inference and disruptions in sensory learning. The current study investigates these theories and examines the alterations that are specific to schizophrenia spectrum disorders vs those that occur as psychotic phenomena intensify, regardless of diagnosis. We recruited 66 participants: 22 schizophrenia spectrum inpatients, 22 nonpsychotic inpatients, and 22 nonclinical controls. Participants completed the reversal oddball task with volatility manipulated. We recorded neural responses with electroencephalography and measured behavioral errors to inferences on sound probabilities. Furthermore, we explored neural dynamics using dynamic causal modeling (DCM). Attenuated prediction errors (PEs) were specifically observed in the schizophrenia spectrum, with reductions in mismatch negativity in stable, and P300 in volatile, contexts. Conversely, aberrations in connectivity were observed across all participants as psychotic phenomena increased. DCM revealed that impaired sensory learning behavior was associated with decreased intrinsic connectivity in the left primary auditory cortex and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG); connectivity in the latter was also reduced with greater severity of psychotic experiences. Moreover, people who experienced more hallucinations and psychotic-like symptoms had decreased bottom-up and increased top-down frontotemporal connectivity, respectively. The findings provide evidence that reduced PEs are specific to the schizophrenia spectrum, but deficits in brain connectivity are aligned on the psychosis continuum. Along the continuum, psychotic experiences were related to an aberrant interplay between top-down, bottom-up, and intrinsic connectivity in the IFG during sensory uncertainty. These findings provide novel insights into psychosis neurocomputational pathophysiology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbaa188

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to healthy controls, schizophrenia patients showed stronger functional connectivity between orbitofrontal and visual cortex, and between the right and left superior temporal gyrus.

    “Compared to HC, patients with SCZ showed stronger functional connectivity between orbitofrontal and vi­ sual cortex, and between the right and left superior temporal gyrus.”
  • In schizophrenia, reduced connectivity between several brain areas was found in tasks involving movements: precuneus and medial prefrontal cortex during predictable motion; left frontal pole, superior frontal gyrus, and paracingulate gyrus during random motion; right cerebellum, left superior frontal gyrus, and paracingulate gyrus during arbitrary motion.

    “Reduced connectivity between several brain areas was found in tasks involving movements, such as precuneus and medial prefrontal cortex during predictable motion; left frontal pole, superior frontal gyrus, and paracingulate gyrus during random motion; right cerebellum, left superior frontal gyrus, and par­ acingulate gyrus during arbitrary motion (Dzafic et al., 2021; Scheliga et al., 2022”
  • In schizophrenia, reduced connectivity between the left and right hemispheres was observed for the inferior/superior frontal gyrus and primary auditory cortex during prediction tasks.

    “Conversely, reduced connectivity between the left and right hemi­ spheres was observed for the inferior/superior frontal gyrus and primary auditory cortex during prediction tasks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dzafic, I., Larsen, K. M., Darke, H., Pertile, H., Carter, O., Sundram, S., & Garrido, M. I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Dzafic, Ilvana
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2021-01-06
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
1039-1047
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W3119608760
Cited by
24
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Queensland (2016000071)
  • Queensland Government
  • Australian Research Council (FT140100807)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia spectrum disorders, psychotic experiences
MeSH terms
Auditory Cortex, Humans, Learning, Perception, Psychotic Disorders, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Patient Acuity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review