Cited by 684Hallucinations in medical conditionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Pavlovian conditioning-induced hallucinations result from overweighting of perceptual priors

Open access
Powers, A. R., Mathys, C., Corlett, P. R.·2017·Science

Abstract

Neural mechanisms for hallucinations: Pairing a stimulus in one modality (vision) with a stimulus in another (sound) can lead to task-induced hallucinations in healthy individuals. After many trials, people eventually report perceiving a nonexistent stimulus contingent on the presence of the previously paired stimulus. Powers et al. investigated how different groups of volunteers and patients respond to this conditioning paradigm. They used behavior, neuroimaging, and computational modeling to dissect the effect of perceptual priors versus sensory evidence on such induced hallucinations. People who are more prone to hear voices were more susceptible to the induced auditory hallucinations. The network of brain regions that was active during the conditioned hallucinations resembled the network observed during clinical symptom capture in individuals who hallucinate while in a brain scanner. Science , this issue p. 596

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aan3458

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with hallucinations had strong perceptual priors that were not present in psychotic patients who did not hallucinate and who may have had weak priors.

    “Powers et al. (2017) found that people with hallucinations had strong perceptual priors that were not present in psychotic patients who did not hallucinate and who, indeed, may have had weak priors (74).”

    From The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis (2018) · cites this paper as [74]

    The paper’s discussion (page not provided) says that stronger perceptual beliefs and prior weighting distinguished participants with hallucinations from those without; its four groups included psychotic patients who did not hear voices. It does not establish that this non-hallucinating psychotic group had weak perceptual priors. Its suggestion of a possible weak prior concerns volatility and psychosis more broadly, not that group specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The presence of strong priors and their immunity to updating were associated with strong insula and hippocampal responses respectively.

    “The presence of strong priors and their immunity to updating were associated with strong insula and hippocampal responses respectively (74).”

    From The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis (2018) · cites this paper as [74]

    The supplied passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) reports greater anterior insula parameter estimates in participants with hallucinations and links hallucinations to stronger perceptual priors. It also links hippocampal responses to belief updating, but does not say that resistance to updating was associated with stronger hippocampal responses; the reduced sensitivity to changing contingencies was reported for participants with psychosis. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using a model of hierarchical Bayesian inference, researchers could link schizophrenia to an overly strong reliance on perceptual priors.

    “and link schizophrenia to an overly strong reliance on perceptual priors [9].”

    From How Do Expectations Shape Perception? (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Abstract (page not supplied) describes a hierarchical perceptual model and reports stronger prior weighting in participants who heard voices. That finding held regardless of psychotic-illness diagnosis, so the paper does not establish overly strong perceptual priors as a feature of schizophrenia generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Computational modelling indicates that patients with hallucinations have more heavily weighted priors than non-hallucinators, and that this is associated with striatal dopamine function.

    “Auditory hallucinations are a common psychotic symptom and computational modelling indicates that patients with hallucinations have more heavily weighted priors than non-hallucinators (97, 98), and that this is associated with striatal dopamine function (97).”

    From Aberrant Salience, Information Processing, and Dopaminergic Signaling in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

    The modelling results in the indexed copy (section labelled Abstract; page unavailable) say the prior-weighting parameter distinguished hallucinators from non-hallucinators. The paper reports caudate activation during conditioned hallucinations, but does not establish an association between prior weighting and striatal dopamine function. That part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Healthy controls show aberrant precision-weighting, as well as aberrant frontostriatal prediction error signalling associated with psychotic-like experiences.

    “Moreover, HC show aberrant precision-weighting, as well as aberrant frontostriatal PE signalling associated with psychotic-like experiences (98, 103).”

    From Aberrant Salience, Information Processing, and Dopaminergic Signaling in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

    The section labelled Abstract (page unavailable) reports that prior weighting distinguished participants with hallucinations from those without, and includes a voice-hearing control group without a diagnosed illness. It does not establish aberrant weighting in healthy controls generally. Its imaging results describe regions engaged during conditioned hallucinations, not aberrant frontostriatal prediction-error signalling associated with psychotic-like experiences. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powers, A. R., Mathys, C., & Corlett, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
Corresponding author
Corlett, P. R.
Venue
Science
Published
2017-08-11
Volume
357
Issue
6351
Pages
596-600
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2744535290
Cited by
684
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 16
FWCI
38.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (award309038, UL1 TR000142)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (award309037, 5T32MH019961, award309043, 5R01MH067073-09)
  • NARSAD (award308859)
  • IMHRO (award308860)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
voice hearing, auditory hallucinations, classical conditioning, perceptual priors, top-down cognitive control, treatment seeking, perceptual learning, computational modeling of perception
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Brain, Computer Simulation, Conditioning, Classical, Female, Hallucinations, Hearing, Humans, Male, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychotic Disorders, Voice, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review