Cited by 360Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Variation in the Heritability of Educational Attainment: An International Meta-Analysis

Branigan, A. R., McCallum, K. J., Freese, J.·2013·Social Forces

Abstract

To assess heterogeneity in the influence of genetic variation on educational attainment across environmental contexts, we present a meta-analysis of heritability estimates in fifteen samples and thirty-four subgroups differing by nationality, sex, and birth cohort. We find that heritability, shared environment, and unshared environment each explain a substantial percentage of the variance in attainment across all countries, with between-sample heterogeneity in all three variance components. Although we observe only meager differences in the total family effect by cohort or sex, we observe large cohort and sex differences in the composition of the family effect, consistent with a history of higher heritability of educational attainment for males and for individuals born in the latter half of the twentieth century. Heritability also varies significantly by nation, with the direction of variation specific by sample. We find a markedly larger impact of shared environment on attainment than has been found for other social outcomes, with the percent of variation in attainment attributable to shared environment exceeding the percent attributable to heritability in one-third of the studies in our sample. Our findings demonstrate the heritability of educational attainment to be environmentally contingent, affirm the widespread and enduring role of shared environment in determining ultimate socioeconomic attainment, and emphasize the importance of considering behavioral genetics techni…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sf/sot076

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Branigan, A. R., McCallum, K. J., & Freese, J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Branigan, A. R.
Venue
Social Forces
Published
2013-06-25
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
109-140
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
OpenAlex
W2106814146
Cited by
360
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 2
FWCI
58.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Forces (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
educational attainment, heritability, shared environment, nonshared environment, genetic variation, socioeconomic attainment, sex differences, birth cohort effects, cross-national variation, social mobility, behavioral genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review