Cited by 47Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disordersMind wandering and attention

Response speed measurements on the psychomotor vigilance test: how precise is precise enough?

Open access
Basner, Mathias, Moore, Tyler M, Nasrini, Jad, Gur, Ruben C, Dinges, David F·2021·Sleep

Abstract

Study Objectives: The psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) is frequently used to measure behavioral alertness in sleep research on various software and hardware platforms. In contrast to many other cognitive tests, PVT response time (RT) shifts of a few milliseconds can be meaningful. It is, therefore, important to use calibrated systems, but calibration standards are currently missing. This study investigated the influence of system latency bias and its variability on two frequently used PVT performance metrics, attentional lapses (RTs ≥500 ms) and response speed, in sleep-deprived and alert participants. Methods: PVT data from one acute total (N = 31 participants) and one chronic partial (N = 43 participants) sleep deprivation protocol were the basis for simulations in which response bias (±15 ms) and its variability (0–50 ms) were systematically varied and transgressions of predefined thresholds (i.e. ±1 for lapses, ±0.1/s for response speed) recorded. Results: Both increasing bias and its variability caused deviations from true scores that were higher for the number of lapses in sleep-deprived participants and for response speed in alert participants. Threshold transgressions were typically rare (i.e. <5%) if system latency bias was less than ±5 ms and its standard deviation was ≤10 ms. Conclusions: A bias of ±5 ms with a standard deviation of ≤10 ms could be considered maximally allowable margins for calibrating PVT systems for timing accuracy. Future studies should report the average system latency and its standard deviation in addition to adhering to published standards for administering and analyzing the PVT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/zsaa121

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Psychomotor Vigilance Task setup was calibrated, showing that logged reaction times deviated from externally recorded stimulus-initiated button-presses with an acceptable standard deviation smaller than 1 millisecond and a bias of 9 milliseconds.

    “The setup was calibrated, showing that logged reaction times deviated from externally recorded stimulus-initiated “button-presses” (using a photo sensor to response box loop) with an acceptable standard deviation smaller 1 millisecond and a bias of 9 milliseconds, mainly related to stimulus buildup time as measured at screen center39.”

    From Effects of total sleep deprivation on performance in a manual spacecraft docking task (2024) · cites this paper as [39]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]6. Patrick GTW, et al. On the effects of sleep loss. Psychol Rev. 1896;3(5):469–483. [Google Scholar]
  2. [7]7. Dinges DF. Probing the limits of funcional capability: the effects of sleep loss on short-duration task. In: Broughton RJ, Ogilvie RD, eds. Sleep, Arousal, and Performance. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser; 1992: 177–188. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basner, M., Moore, T. M., Nasrini, J., Gur, R. C., & Dinges, D. F.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Basner, Mathias
Venue
Sleep
Published
2020-07-02
Volume
44
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W3036442098
Cited by
47
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX16AI53G)
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (FAA #04-G-010, R01 NR004281, R01 HL102119, UL1 RR024134)
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
psychomotor vigilance test, reaction time (psychology), calibration standards, attentional lapses, response speed, sleep deprivation, timing accuracy
MeSH terms
Attention, Humans, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review