Cited by 402Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsAction Observation and Synchronization

Motion processing in autism: evidence for a dorsal stream deficiency

Open access
Spencer, Janine, OʼBrien, Justin, Riggs, Kevin, Braddick, Oliver, Atkinson, Janette, Wattam-Bell, John·2000·Neuroreport

Abstract

We report that motion coherence thresholds in children with autism are significantly higher than in matched controls. No corresponding difference in form coherence thresholds was found. We interpret this as a specific deficit in dorsal stream function in autism. To examine the possibility of a neural basis for the perceptual and motor related abnormalities frequently cited in autism we tested 23 children diagnosed with autistic disorder, on two tasks specific to dorsal and ventral cortical stream functions. The results provide evidence that autistic individuals have a specific impairment in dorsal stream functioning. We conclude that autism may have common features with other developmental disorders and with early stages of normal development, perhaps reflecting a greater vulnerability of the dorsal system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200008210-00031

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Spencer et al. (2000), there was a smaller and non-significant difference between ASD and control performance in a similar form coherence task.

    “There was a smaller and non-significant difference between ASD and control performance in a similar form coherence task.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Spencer et al. (2000)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, J., OʼBrien, J., Riggs, K., Braddick, O., Atkinson, J., & Wattam-Bell, J.
Affiliations
  • London Metropolitan University (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2000-08
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
2765-2767
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003079555
Cited by
402
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, motion coherence, dorsal stream, ventral stream, visual motion processing, perceptual deficits, children, developmental disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Preschool, Differential Threshold, Form Perception, Humans, Motion Perception, Neural Pathways, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review