The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Compact Bone Fatigue Damage: A Microscopic Examination
Abstract
Flexural fatigue tests of bovine bone specimens produced fracture surfaces that were transverse on the tension side and oblique on the compression side. Similar fracture patterns were produced by bending tests with a single applied loading. Microscopic examination of flexural fatigue specimens prior to complete established that fatigue fracture is caused by the progressive accumulation of diffuse structural damage. The microdamage observed on the tension side consisted primarily of separation (or debonding) at cement lines and interlamellar cement bands. Tensile cracks in interstitial bone were also observed. The major damage modes on the compression side were oblique cracking and longitudinal splitting. The fatigue fracture patterns observed for the bone specimens correspond to the types of fatigue fractures observed clinically. Compact bone fatigue fractures in areas of longitudinal tensile stresses are generally seen as transverse lesions, whereas fatigue fractures in areas of longitudinal compressive stresses are normally oblique fractures. The diffuse nature of the observed fatigue damage is consistent with the hypothesis that microdamage caused by mechanical loading may serve as a stimulus for in vivo bone remodeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: A tutorial
Turner, C. H., & Burr, D. B. (1993) · Bone · doi:10.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-k · Cited by 1,666
BIOMECHANICAL AND MOLECULAR REGULATION OF BONE REMODELING
Robling, A. G., Castillo, A. B., & Turner, C. H. (2006) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095721 · Cited by 1,343
The aging of Wolff’s “law”: Ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone
Pearson, O. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20155 · Cited by 745
Bone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis
Osterhoff, G., Morgan, E. F., Shefelbine, S. J., Karim, L., McNamara, L. M., & Augat, P. (2016) · Injury · doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(16)47003-8 · Cited by 557
Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review
Doblaré, M., Garcı́a, J. M., & Gómez, M. J. (2004) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.08.003 · Cited by 504
Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis
Armas, L. A. G., & Recker, R. R. (2012) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2012.04.006 · Cited by 466
Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone
Pattin, C. A., Caler, W. E., & Carter, D. R. (1996) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(94)00156-1 · Cited by 442
Self-citationDoes microdamage accumulation affect the mechanical properties of bone?
Burr, D. B., Turner, C. H., Naick, P., Forwood, M. R., Ambrosius, W., Sayeed Hasan, M., & Pidaparti, R. (1998) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00016-5 · Cited by 417
Osteocyte Apoptosis Controls Activation of Intracortical Resorption in Response to Bone Fatigue
Cardoso, L., Herman, B. C., Verborgt, O., Laudier, D., Majeska, R. J., & Schaffler, M. B. (2009) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.081210 · Cited by 340
Kennedy, O. D., Herman, B. C., Laudier, D. M., Majeska, R. J., Sun, H. B., & Schaffler, M. B. (2012) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2012.01.025 · Cited by 275
Bone creep-fatigue damage accumulation
Caler, W. E., & Carter, D. R. (1989) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(89)90013-4 · Cited by 263
Self-citationSchwiedrzik, J., Raghavan, R., Bürki, A., LeNader, V., Wolfram, U., Michler, J., & Zysset, P. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3959 · Cited by 182
Kennedy, O. D., Laudier, D. M., Majeska, R. J., Sun, H. B., & Schaffler, M. B. (2014) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.03.049 · Cited by 151
Age-related differences in post-yield damage in human cortical bone. Experiment and model
Courtney, A. C., Hayes, W. C., & Gibson, L. J. (1996) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(96)84542-8 · Cited by 131
Self-citationThe Supraorbital Torus: "A Most Remarkable Peculiarity" [and Comments and Replies]
Russell, M. D., Brown, T., Garn, S. M., Giris, F., Turkel, S., İşcan, M. Y., Oyen, O. J., Jacobshagen, B., Pietrusewsky, M., Rightmire, G. P., et al. (1985) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/203279 · Cited by 107
Influence of microdamage on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia
Norman, T. L., Yeni, Y. N., Brown, C. U., & Wang, Z. (1998) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00103-3 · Cited by 102
Sub-lamellar microcracking and roles of canaliculi in human cortical bone
Ebacher, V., Guy, P., Oxland, T. R., & Wang, R. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.013 · Cited by 61
Modeling the onset and propagation of trabecular bone microdamage during low-cycle fatigue
Kosmopoulos, V., Schizas, C., & Keller, T. S. (2008) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.10.020 · Cited by 44
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 39
A damage assessment model for cadaveric cortical bone subjected to fatigue cycles
Varvani-Farahani, A., & Najmi, H. (2010) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.08.002 · Cited by 16
Osteonal Microcracking Pattern: A Potential Vitality Marker in Human Bone Trauma
Schwab, N., Galtés, I., Winter-Buchwalder, M., Ortega-Sánchez, M., & Jordana, X. (2023) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology12030399 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- CARTER, D. R., & HAYES, W. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 127
- Pages
- 265-274
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040358256
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
