Cited by 261Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphometric Analysis of the Corpus Callosum

SEMRUD-CLIKEMAN, MARGARET, FILIPEK, PAULINE A., BIEDERMAN, JOSEPH, STEINGARD, RONALD, KENNEDY, DAVID, RENSHAW, PERRY, BEKKEN, KAAREN·1994·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The following study seeks to document possible differences in corpus callosal area and shape between children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and controls. Methods Fifteen carefully diagnosed right-handed male subjects with ADHD with overactivity symptomatology were compared to 15 right-handed male control subjects. The corpus callosum was divided into seven areas on the midsagittal slice of a magnetic resonance image with shape analysis also conducted. Results An exploratory shape analysis showed no significant differences in shape between the groups. No group differences were found in the area, length, or anterior regions of the corpus callosum. The ADHD subjects were found to have significantly smaller posterior corpus callosum regions than the control group, with the splenium accounting for most of the variance between the groups. Conclusions The splenial area of the corpus callosum is smaller in children with ADHD than in a sample of normally developing children. These smaller areas may relate to commonly seen sustained attention deficits which in turn negatively impact on the development of more advanced levels of attention such as self-regulation. Further study of the regions surrounding the splenial area is suggested to determine whether they are correlated in size to the smaller corpus callosum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199407000-00014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SEMRUD-CLIKEMAN, M., FILIPEK, P. A., BIEDERMAN, J., STEINGARD, R., KENNEDY, D., RENSHAW, P., & BEKKEN, K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-07
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
875-881
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970583855
Cited by
261
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-14275, T32MH014275)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, corpus callosum, splenium, corpus callosum morphology, corpus callosum area, sustained attention, children, overactivity, structural brain differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Corpus Callosum, Desipramine, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methylphenidate, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Radiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review