Cited by 177Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Religious Coping, Ethnicity, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Steffen, Patrick R., Hinderliter, Alan L., Blumenthal, James A., Sherwood, Andrew·2001·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between religious coping, ethnicity, and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measured during daily life. METHODS: A 24-hour ABP was obtained from 155 men and women (78 African American and 77 white) on a typical workday. ABP was averaged over awake and sleep periods, and clinic BP was also assessed. Psychosocial measures of coping style, negative affect, social support, stress, and health behaviors were completed before ABP measurement. RESULTS: Multiple regression analyses, controlling for demographic variables, revealed a significant religious coping by ethnicity interaction for ABP (p < .01) and clinic BP (p < .05). Religious coping was not related to BP among whites. Among African Americans, however, higher levels of religious coping were associated with lower awake (p < .05) and sleep (p < .01) ABP. Social support satisfaction also was related to lower awake ABP among African Americans, but it did not mediate the relationship between religious coping and ABP. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study extend previous findings by showing that, among African Americans, religious coping and BP are related during daily activities as well as in the clinic. Lower 24-hour BP load may be a pathway through which religiosity and cardiovascular health are related.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006842-200107000-00002

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 39 highest-quality blood pressure studies, 24 (62%) report lower BP, including one at a trend level, among those who are more R/S or in response to an R/S intervention.

    “Of the 39 highest quality studies, 24 (62%) report lower BP (including one at a trend level) among those who are more R/S [382–394] or in response to an R/S intervention [328, 395–404]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steffen, P. R., Hinderliter, A. L., Blumenthal, J. A., & Sherwood, A.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2001-07
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
523-530
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990209243
Cited by
177
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL49427, R01HL049427)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH19109, T32MH019109)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 30)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
religious coping, ethnicity, ambulatory blood pressure, African Americans, social support, sleep blood pressure, cardiovascular health, religiosity, stress, negative affect, health behavior
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Black or African American, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Religion and Psychology, Social Support, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review