Cited by 56Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Mood and Neuropsychological Changes in Women With Midlife Depression Treated With Escitalopram

Wroolie, Tonita E., Williams, Katherine E., Keller, Jennifer, Zappert, Laurel N., Shelton, Stephanie D., Kenna, Heather A., Reynolds, Margaret F., Rasgon, Natalie L.·2006·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed mood and neuropsychological function in a population of middle-aged women with major depressive disorder treated with escitalopram. METHODS: Psychometric data measuring severity of depression were collected from 19 women and neuropsychological data were collected from 17 women aged between 45 and 65 years with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of major depression in a study in the Behavioral Neuroendocrinology Program at the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine. All women were treated with escitalopram in an open-label design. Mean age was 55.94 years and mean number of years of education was 16.36 years. Diagnosis of major depressive disorder was assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and mood was evaluated with the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) at baseline and at weekly follow-ups for 12 weeks. Cognition was assessed at baseline and 3 months after treatment using a neuropsychological test battery, which included an abbreviated measure of Full Scale Intelligence Quotient, measures of attention and processing speed, verbal and nonverbal memory, executive functioning, and verbal fluency. Self-report data were collected on current menopause status and current hormone therapy use in the postmenopausal women. Paired sample t tests were used to analyze the change in total HAM-D scores and neuropsychological variables. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were found in total HAM-D score, Wechsler Memory Scale III Logical Memory 1st Recall, I, and II scores, Wechsler Memory Scale III Visual Reproduction I scores, and Trail Making Test Part B scores. There was a statistically significant decrease in Controlled Oral Word Association Test FAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of depression with escitalopram in a population of middle-aged women was shown to improve mood and cognitive efficiency in complex attention, short- and long-term recall of contextual information, short-term recall of visual information, and cognitive flexibility; however, it was shown to worsen phonemic fluency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jcp.0000227699.26375.f8

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) has been classified as a test of phonemic verbal fluency, which falls within language function, and has also been deemed a measure of processing speed or executive function.

    “the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) has been classified as a test of phonemic verbal fluency, which falls within the cognitive domain of language function,31 but it has also been deemed a measure of processing speed or executive function.57”
  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment led to a significant improvement in memory performance in individuals with major depressive disorder.

    “For example, it was reported that SSRI treatment led to a significant improvement in memory performance (i.e. immediate and delayed verbal, immediate visual, and declarative memory) in individuals with MDD [59, 60].”
  • Significant impairment of executive functioning (i.e. phonemic fluency) has been reported following treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

    “Significant impairment of executive functioning (i.e. phonemic fluency) has also been reported following treatment with SSRIs [60].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wroolie, T. E., Williams, K. E., Keller, J., Zappert, L. N., Shelton, S. D., Kenna, H. A., Reynolds, M. F., & Rasgon, N. L.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Rasgon, Natalie L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-08
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
361-366
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975658612
Cited by
56
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
School of Medicine, Stanford University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
escitalopram, major depressive disorder, middle-aged women, mood, neuropsychological performance, cognitive flexibility, memory retrieval, attention, phonemic fluency, menopause, hormone therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Menopause, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Citalopram, Treatment Outcome, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Mood Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review