Cited by 172Innovations in Medical EducationVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Theory to Practice: The Application of Cognitive Load Theory to the Practice of Medicine

Open access

Abstract

Cognitive load theory has become a leading model in educational psychology and has started to gain traction in the medical education community over the last decade. The theory is rooted in our current understanding of human cognitive architecture in which an individual’s limited working memory and unlimited long-term memory interact during the process of learning. Though initially described as primarily a theory of learning, parallels between cognitive load theory and broader aspects of medical education as well as clinical practice are now becoming clear. These parallels are particularly relevant and evident in complex clinical environments, like resuscitation medicine. The authors have built on these connections to develop a recontextualized version of cognitive load theory that applies to complex professional domains and in which the connections between the theory and clinical practice are made explicit, with resuscitation medicine as a case study. Implications of the new model for medical education are also presented along with suggested applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000003524

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Szulewski, A., Howes, D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Szulewski, Adam
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2020-12-29
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
24-30
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3029841721
Cited by
171
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
cognitive load theory, medical education, clinical practice, working memory, long-term memory, resuscitation medicine, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cognition, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Physicians, Students, Medical, Models, Educational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review