Cited by 25Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorGambling Behavior and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Clinical Significance of Food Addiction

Wenzel, Kevin R., Weinstock, Jeremiah, McGrath, Andrew B.·2020·Journal of Addiction Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: The construct of food addiction has received increased attention and has been proposed as a mental disorder. There is some evidence that supports the inclusion of food addiction in the psychiatric nosology; however, the construct has not been sufficiently validated for inclusion. This study used the addiction syndrome model as a guiding theoretical framework to understand food addiction. The addiction syndrome model emphasizes the shared antecedents and consequences of addictions even though specific manifestations may differ. Methods: Participants were adult community members with food addiction (n = 26) or healthy controls (n = 26) as classified by the Yale Food Addiction Scale. Participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains often associated with addiction. Results: Results revealed that individuals with food addiction demonstrated significantly higher scores than healthy controls on depressive symptoms, emotion dysregulation, emotional eating, demand characteristics, motives, impulsivity, and family history of mental health problems and addiction, providing support for the clinical significance of food addiction. Conclusions: Overall, this study replicates and extends previous findings, particularly in regard to behavioral economics and demand for food, providing further support for the consideration of food addiction in the psychiatric nosology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000626

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wenzel, K. R., Weinstock, J., & McGrath, A. B.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Wenzel, Kevin R.
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2020-01-31
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
e153-e159
ISSN
  • 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-3227
OpenAlex
W3004581121
Cited by
25
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
food addiction, psychiatric classification, Yale Food Addiction Scale, depressive symptoms, emotional dysregulation, emotional eating, impulsivity, demand characteristics, behavioral economics, food cravings
MeSH terms
Food Addiction, Adult, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Surveys and Questionnaires, Behavior, Addictive, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review