Cited by 615Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Strength training increases insulin-mediated glucose uptake, GLUT4 content, and insulin signaling in skeletal muscle in patients with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Holten, Mads K., Zacho, Morten, Gaster, Michael, Juel, Carsten, Wojtaszewski, Jørgen F.P., Dela, Flemming·2004·Diabetes

Abstract

Strength training represents an alternative to endurance training for patients with type 2 diabetes. Little is known about the effect on insulin action and key proteins in skeletal muscle, and the necessary volume of strength training is unknown. A total of 10 type 2 diabetic subjects and 7 healthy men (control subjects) strength-trained one leg three times per week for 6 weeks while the other leg remained untrained. Each session lasted no more than 30 min. After strength training, muscle biopsies were obtained, and an isoglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with arterio-femoral venous catheterization of both legs was carried out. In general, qualitatively similar responses were obtained in both groups. During the clamp, leg blood flow was higher (P < 0.05) in trained versus untrained legs, but despite this, arterio-venous extraction glucose did not decrease in trained legs. Thus, leg glucose clearance was increased in trained legs (P < 0.05) and more than explained by increases in muscle mass. Strength training increased protein content of GLUT4, insulin receptor, protein kinase B-α/β, glycogen synthase (GS), and GS total activity. In conclusion, we found that strength training for 30 min three times per week increases insulin action in skeletal muscle in both groups. The adaptation is attributable to local contraction-mediated mechanisms involving key proteins in the insulin signaling cascade.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.53.2.294

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training can enhance the responsiveness of skeletal muscles to insulin with increased expression and/or activity of proteins involved in glucose metabolism and insulin signaling.

    “Training can enhance the responsiveness of skeletal muscles to insulin with increased expression and/or activity of proteins involved in glucose metabolism and insulin signaling ( 39 , 110 , 204 , 270 ).”

    From Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [110]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. Kjær M, Krogsaard M, Magnusson P, Engebretsen L, Roos H, Takala T, Woo SL-Y, Eds. Oxford, U.K., Blackwell Science, 2003, p. 435-450

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holten, M. K., Zacho, M., Gaster, M., Juel, C., Wojtaszewski, J. F. P., & Dela, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
294-305
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2153401503
Cited by
615
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 39
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
  • University of Cambridge
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (504–14)
  • Diabetesforeningen
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resistance training, type 2 diabetes, insulin action, skeletal muscle, GLUT4, insulin signaling, glycogen synthase, Akt, insulin receptor, glucose uptake, glucose clearance, muscle blood flow, training volume
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Capillaries, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Glycogen, Humans, Insulin, Leg, Male, Monosaccharide Transport Proteins, Muscle Proteins, Physical Fitness, Reference Values, Tensile Strength, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, White People, Glucose Transporter Type 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review