Cited by 72Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

May the force be with you: Why resistance training is essential for subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications

Open access
Codella, Roberto, Ialacqua, Marta, Terruzzi, Ileana, Luzi, Livio·2018·Endocrine

Abstract

Physical activity, together with diet and pharmacological therapy, represents one of the three cornerstones in type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment and care. The therapeutic appeal of regular physical activity stems from: (i) its non-pharmacological nature; (ii) its beneficial effects on the metabolic risk factors associated with diabetes complications; (iii) its low costs. Evidence accumulated in the last years suggests that aerobic training-endurance training-constitutes a safe modality of intervention, achievable, and effective in diabetes treatment, whenever it is not limited by comorbidities. Aerobic training exerts insulin-mimetic effects and has been shown to lower mortality risk too. Anaerobic, intense physical activity, such as that of strength or power sports disciplines, is not univocally recognized as safe and simple to realize, however, it is important in stimulating energy and glucose metabolism. According to recent evidence, high-intensity training may be prescribed even in the face of cardiovascular diseases, peripheral vascular disease, or osteoarthritis. Some studies have shown resistance training to be more efficient than aerobic exercise in improving glycemic control. This review explores the most up-to-date indications emerging from literature in support of the beneficial effects of strength stimulation and resistance training in patients with type 2 diabetes without complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12020-018-1603-7

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Codella, R., Ialacqua, M., Terruzzi, I., & Luzi, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
Corresponding author
Codella, Roberto
Venue
Endocrine
Published
2018-05-05
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
14-25
ISSN
  • 0969-711X (ISSN-L)
  • 1355-008X
  • 1559-0100
OpenAlex
W2799876477
Cited by
72
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, resistance training, high-intensity training, aerobic exercise, glycemic control, physical activity, insulin sensitivity, exercise safety, diabetes complications
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Physical Fitness, Exercise, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review