Cited by 174Gastrointestinal motility and disordersProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Probiotic Bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 Versus Placebo for the Symptoms of Bloating in Patients With Functional Bowel Disorders: A Double-blind Study

Open access
Ringel-Kulka, Tamar, Palsson, Olafur S., Maier, Danielle, Carroll, Ian, Galanko, Joseph A., Leyer, Gregory, Ringel, Yehuda·2011·Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest a role for the intestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of functional bowel disorders (FBDs). Probiotic studies in FBDs generated inconsistent results suggesting a strain-specific and product-specific effect. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (L-NCFM) and Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 (B-LBi07) in nonconstipation FBDs. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-control clinical trial of the probiotic bacterias L-NCFM and B-LBi07 twice a day (2×10(11) CFU/d) versus placebo over 8 weeks. Primary endpoints were global relief of gastrointestinal symptoms and satisfaction with treatment. Secondary endpoints were change in symptoms severity, well-being, and quality of life. Microbiological effect was assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction on fecal samples. RESULTS: Sixty patients (probiotic, n=31; placebo, n=29), 72% females, 84% whites, mean age 37 years. Abdominal bloating improved in the probiotics compared with the placebo group at 4 weeks (4.10 vs 6.17, P=0.009; change in bloating severity P=0.02) and 8 weeks (4.26 vs 5.84, P=0.06; change in bloating severity P<0.01). Analyses on the irritable bowel syndrome subgroup (n=33) showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: L-NCFM and B-LBi07 twice a day improve symptoms of bloating in patients with FBDs. These data supports the role of intestinal bacteria in the pathophysiology of FBD and the role for probiotic bacteria in the management of these disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mcg.0b013e31820ca4d6

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other probiotic studies in healthy subjects with minor digestive symptoms have mainly focused on GI well-being and symptoms with mixed results.

    “Other probiotic studies in healthy subjects with minor digestive symptoms have mainly focused on GI well-being and symptoms with mixed results( 25 , 26 , 39 ).”

    From Effect of the probiotic strain <i>Bifidobacterium animalis</i> subsp. <i>lactis</i> , BB-12 <sup>®</sup> , on defecation frequency in healthy subjects with low defecation frequency and abdominal discomfort: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (2015) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods (Study population) describe participants with diagnosed functional bowel disorders and active symptoms, not healthy subjects with minor digestive symptoms. The Methods (Assessment for clinical effect) and Results (Clinical Effects) show that the study assessed GI symptoms and well-being and found mixed outcomes: bloating improved, but global symptom relief and well-being did not differ from placebo. The cited study therefore supports the outcomes and mixed-results portion, but not the claimed population. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other smaller studies reported some beneficial effects with other probiotic strains including Bifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010, Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75, Lactobacillus plantarum 299V, Saccharomyces boulardii, combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07, and multispecies probiotic mixtures.

    “Other smaller studies reported some beneficial effects with other probiotic strains including Bifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010 (74), Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 (72), Lactobacillus plantarum 299V (117), Saccharomyces boulardii (37), and combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 (144) and multispecies probiotic mixtures (71, 87, 88).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Longstreth GF Thompson WG Chey WD Drossman DA Corazziari E Delvaux M Functional bowel disorders Rome III: the functional gastrointestinal disorders 2006 9 487 555 Degnon Associates McLean (VA) 3rd edition
  2. [7]Ringel Y Drossman DA Runge MS Greganti MA Irritable bowel syndrome Netter’s textbook of internal medicine 2008 59 419 25 Saunders Elsevier Philadelphia 2nd edition
  3. [42]Carroll MI Ringel-Kulka T Ringel Y Floch MH Kim AS Quantification and Identification of Probiotic Organisms in Humans Probiotics: A Clinical Guide 2010 SLACK Incorporated New Jersey 1st edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringel-Kulka, T., Palsson, O. S., Maier, D., Carroll, I., Galanko, J. A., Leyer, G., & Ringel, Y.
Corresponding author
  • Palsson, Olafur S.
  • Maier, Danielle
  • Carroll, Ian
  • Galanko, Joseph A.
  • Ringel, Yehuda
Venue
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2011-07
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
518-525
ISSN
0192-0790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009129153
Cited by
174
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK075621, DK 034987, P30DK034987)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00046, M01RR000046)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM, bloating, functional bowel disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, gut microbiota, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, fecal microbiota
MeSH terms
Adult, Bifidobacterium, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Female, Flatulence, Humans, Intestines, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review