Cited by 46Gastrointestinal motility and disordersProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Efficacy of combination therapy with probiotics and mosapride in patients with IBS without diarrhea: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter, phase II trial

Open access
Choi, C. H., Kwon, J. G., Kim, S. K., Myung, S.‐J., Park, K. S., Sohn, C.‐I., Rhee, P.‐L., Lee, K. J. +8 more·2015·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background: Probiotics can be beneficial in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Mosapride citrate, a selective 5‐HT4 receptor agonist, stimulates gastrointestinal motility. We investigated the efficacy of combination therapy with probiotics and mosapride for non‐diarrheal‐type IBS. Methods: Two hundred and eighty‐five IBS patients were randomly assigned to either a combination of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus faecium) and mosapride at one of four different doses or a placebo for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing adequate relief (AR) of global IBS symptoms at week 4. The secondary outcomes included subject's global assessment (SGA) of IBS symptom relief, individual symptoms, stool parameters, and IBS‐quality of life. Key Results: The proportion of AR at week 4 was significantly higher in all treatment groups compared to the placebo group (53.7% in group 1, 55.0% in group 2, 55.2% in group 3, 53.6% in group 4 [the highest dose], and 35.1% in placebo group, respectively,p < 0.05). The proportion of patients reporting ‘completely or considerably relieved’ in the SGA was higher in the treatment groups than in the placebo group. The abdominal pain/discomfort score in the treatment group 4 was more prominently improved compared with that of the placebo group. In patients with constipation‐predominant IBS, the improvements in stool frequency and consistency were significantly higher in the treatment groups 4 and 1, respectively, than those in the placebo group. Conclusions & Inferences: Combination therapy with probiotics and mosapride is effective for relief of symptoms in patients with non‐diarrheal‐type IBS. The study has been registered in the US National Library of Medicine (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01505777).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.12544

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A combination of probiotics Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus faecium was effective for relief of symptoms in patients with non-diarrheal-type IBS.

    “a combination of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus faecium) was effective for relief of symptoms in patients with non diarrhealtype IBS [212]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, C. H., Kwon, J. G., Kim, S. K., Myung, S. ‐., Park, K. S., Sohn, C. ‐., Rhee, P. ‐., Lee, K. J., Lee, O. Y., Jung, H. ‐., Jee, S. R., Jeen, Y. T., Choi, M. ‐., Choi, S. C., Huh, K. C., & Park, H.
Affiliations
  • Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR)
  • Daegu Catholic University (KR)
  • Kyungpook National University (KR)
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
  • Keimyung University (KR)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Ajou University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Inje University (KR)
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • Wonkwang University (KR)
  • Konyang University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, H.
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-25
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
705-716
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W2144598479
Cited by
46
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, mosapride, Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecium, 5-HT4 receptor agonist, combination therapy, gastrointestinal motility, abdominal pain, IBS quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacillus subtilis, Benzamides, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Gastrointestinal Agents, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morpholines, Quality of Life, Abdominal Pain, Treatment Outcome, Enterococcus faecium, Probiotics, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review