Cited by 367Gastrointestinal motility and disordersProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Clinical trial: multispecies probiotic supplementation alleviates the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and stabilizes intestinal microbiota

Open access
KAJANDER, K., MYLLYLUOMA, E., RAJILIĆ‐STOJANOVIĆ, M., KYRÖNPALO, S., RASMUSSEN, M., JÄRVENPÄÄ, S., ZOETENDAL, E. G., DE VOS, W. M. +2 more·2008·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background Irritable bowel syndrome is the most common diagnosis in gastroenterology. Trials suggest certain probiotics to be beneficial. Aim To investigate the effects of multispecies probiotic supplementation ( Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus Lc705, Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis Bb12) on abdominal symptoms, quality of life, intestinal microbiota and inflammatory markers in irritable bowel syndrome. Methods Eighty‐six irritable bowel syndrome patients (Rome II criteria) participated in this randomized, placebo‐controlled 5‐month intervention. Patients were randomized to receive daily either multispecies probiotic supplementation or placebo. Irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, quality of life, microarray‐based intestinal microbiota stability ( n = 20), serum cytokines and sensitive C‐reactive protein were monitored. Results The composite irritable bowel syndrome score had at 5 months decreased 14 points (95% CI: −19 to −9) from baseline with the multispecies probiotic vs. three points (95% CI: −8 to 1) with placebo ( P = 0.0083). Especially, distension and abdominal pain were affected. A stabilization of the microbiota was observed, as the microbiota similarity index increased with the probiotic supplementation (1.9 ± 3.1), while it decreased with placebo (−2.9 ± 1.7). No differences were seen in C‐reactive protein. Conclusions This multispecies probiotic seems to be an effective and safe option to alleviate symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, and to stabilize the intestinal microbiota.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03542.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 46 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    The probiotic treatment had a beneficial effect on the bowel symptoms domain of quality of life, with a median change of 0.62 points (95% CI 0.37-0.86) versus 0.37 points (95% CI 0.17-0.61) in placebo (P=0.045).

    “The probiotic treatment had a beneficial effect on the bowel symptoms domain (Figure 3). The Hodges-Lehmann estimate for median change from baseline to the end of the study was 0.62 points (95% CI: 0.37-0.86) in the probiotic group vs. 0.37 points (95% CI: 0.17-0.61) in the placebo group ( P -value for difference between groups = 0.045).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 5

    No differences between groups were seen in the prevalence of soft stools, hard stools or diarrhoea.

    “No differences between the groups were seen in the prevalence of soft stools, hard stools or diarrhoea.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Adverse events and antimicrobial treatments · p. 7

    At least one adverse event was reported by 10 of 43 probiotic recipients and 15 of 43 placebo recipients.

    “Ten of the 43 subjects in the probiotic group and 15 of the 43 subjects in the placebo group reported at least one adverse event.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Adverse events and antimicrobial treatments · p. 8

    Antimicrobial prescriptions did not differ between groups: 19% (8/43) in the probiotic group and 26% (11/43) in the placebo group (P = 0.436).

    “There was no difference between the groups in antimicrobial treatments: 19% (eight of 43) of the subjects in the probiotic group, and 26% (11 of 43) in the placebo group were prescribed antimicrobials ( P = 0.436).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    HRQL improved in the probiotic group for the bowel symptoms domain.

    “One important finding of the present study is that the HRQL showed improvement in the probiotic group for the domain describing bowel symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 34
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Primary outcome measures · p. 4

    At 20 weeks, the composite IBS symptom score had decreased by 14 points (95% CI -19 to -9) from baseline with probiotic versus 3 points (95% CI -8 to 1) with placebo, with a significant between-group difference (P=0.0083).

    “Compared to baseline, the IBS symptom score had, at 20 weeks, decreased 14 points (95% CI: ) 19 to ) 9) with the probiotic treatment vs. three points (95% CI: ) 8 to 1) in the placebo group ( P -value for difference between groups = 0.0083).”
    • Also stated in: § Primary outcome measures · p. 4 · plain
      “This represents a mean reduction of 37% in IBS score in the probiotic group compared to a 9% reduction in the placebo group.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · p. 1 · plain
      “The composite irritable bowel syndrome score had at 5 months decreased 14 points (95% CI: ) 19 to ) 9) from baseline with the multispecies probiotic vs. three points (95% CI: ) 8 to 1) with placebo ( P = 0.0083).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Results · p. 1

    No differences were seen in C-reactive protein.

    “No differences were seen in C-reactive protein.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results · p. 1

    The microbiota similarity index increased with probiotic supplementation (1.9 ± 3.1) and decreased with placebo (-2.9 ± 1.7), indicating stabilization.

    “A stabilization of the microbiota was observed, as the microbiota similarity index increased with the probiotic supplementation (1.9 3.1), while it decreased with placebo ( ) 2.9 1.7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    In the trial, the average log similarity index from baseline to the intervention sample was 91.8 (s.d. 3.1) in the probiotic group and 94.5 (s.d. 1.3) in the placebo group, with a significant between-group difference (P = 0.026).

    “Following the introduction of probiotics or placebo, the mean logarithmic similarity index between the baseline and the intervention sample (similarity index AB) was 91.8 (s.d. 3.1) in the probiotic group and 94.5 (s.d. 1.3) in the placebo group ( P = 0.026 for difference between groups).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    In the 86 IBS patients, the abdominal pain score change from baseline to end of the 20-week trial was 0 (95% CI -2 to 2) in the placebo group and -3 (95% CI -5 to -2) in the probiotic group, with P = 0.052.

    “| Abdominal pain | 6 (4) | 8 (6) | 0 ( ) 2 to 2) | ) 3 ( ) 5 to ) 2) | 0.052 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    In the 86 IBS patients, the total IBS symptom score change from baseline to end of the 20-week trial was -3 (95% CI -8 to 1) in the placebo group and -14 (95% CI -19 to -9) in the probiotic group, with P = 0.0083.

    “| Total IBS | 33 (16) | 38 (21) | ) 3 ( ) 8 to 1) | ) 14 ( ) 19 to ) 9) | 0.0083 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 7

    For health-related quality of life, the baseline-adjusted change to follow-up between groups had P = 0.045 for bowel symptoms, P = 0.087 for fatigue, P = 0.81 for activity limitations, and P = 0.72 for emotional function.

    “P -values for baseline-adjusted change to follow-up between groups: bowel symptoms ( P = 0.045), fatigue ( P = 0.087), activity limitations ( P = 0.81) and emotional function ( P = 0.72).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    In the 86 IBS patients, the flatulence score change from baseline to end of the 20-week trial was -2 (95% CI -4 to 0) in the placebo group and -4 (95% CI -6 to -2) in the probiotic group, with P = 0.11.

    “| Flatulence | 12 (6) | 12 (6) | ) 2 ( ) 4 to 0) | ) 4 ( ) 6 to ) 2) | 0.11 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    In the 86 IBS patients, the distension score change from baseline to end of the 20-week trial was -1 (95% CI -3 to 1) in the placebo group and -4 (95% CI -6 to -2) in the probiotic group, with P = 0.023.

    “| Distension | 10 (7) | 11 (7) | ) 1 ( ) 3 to 1) | ) 4 ( ) 6 to ) 2) | 0.023 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    The ratio of intervention to baseline CRP was 0.91 (95% CI 0.73-1.10) in the probiotic group and 1.16 (95% CI 0.85-1.47) in the placebo group, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.21).

    “The ratio of the intervention value to the baseline value was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.73-1.10) for the probiotic supplementation and 1.16 (95% CI: 0.85-1.47) for placebo ( P = 0.21). No differences were thus seen between the two groups in CRP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    In the 86 IBS patients, the rumbling score change from baseline to end of the 20-week trial was -1 (95% CI -2 to 0) in the placebo group and -3 (95% CI -4 to -1) in the probiotic group, with P = 0.086.

    “| Rumbling | 5 (5) | 6 (6) | ) 1 ( ) 2 to 0) | ) 3 ( ) 4 to ) 1) | 0.086 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    In this trial, the composite IBS symptom score decreased by 37% in the probiotic group and 9% in the placebo group.

    “In the earlier study, we saw a 42% reduction in the composite IBS symptom score, while we now observed a 37% decrease. The corresponding figures for the placebo group in the respective trials are 6% and 9%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    During the second half of the intervention, the similarity index rose by 1.87 (s.d. 3.13) with probiotic and fell by 2.93 (s.d. 1.68) with placebo; the between-group difference was -4.8 (95% CI -6.59 to -2.54), P = 0.0015.

    “During the second half of the intervention period, a stabilization of the microbiota was observed with probiotic supplementation, as the similarity index increased with the probiotic supplementation (1.87 3.13) and decreased with placebo ( ) 2.93 1.68). The difference between the groups ( ) 4.8; 95% CI: ) 6.59 to ) 2.54) was significant ( P = 0.0015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION · p. 9

    The trial found that intestinal microbiota stabilization occurred alongside symptom reduction.

    “Furthermore, we observed a concurrent stabilization of the intestinal microbiota with symptom reduction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § I NTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Imbalanced microbiota may contribute to inflammation in IBS, since microbiota deviations have been observed in IBS and IBD studies suggest microbiota can trigger mucosal inflammation.

    “Imbalanced microbiota may be one such factor, as deviations in microbiota have been seen in IBS 23-25 and as studies on inflammatory bowel disease imply that the microbiota is able to trigger mucosal inflammation. 26”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § I NTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Cytokines may influence epithelial cells, smooth muscle and enteric nerves, which supports a possible role in generating IBS symptoms.

    “The possible role of cytokines in IBS symptom generation has found support in studies showing that cytokines influence epithelial cells, smooth muscle and enteric nerves. 22”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § I NTRODUCTION · p. 2

    The authors' earlier clinical trial found that a multispecies probiotic significantly alleviates IBS symptoms, but the mechanisms behind these effects remain unknown.

    “We have recently shown in a clinical trial that a multispecies probiotic significantly alleviates IBS symptoms, but the mechanisms behind the effects are not known. 10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Statistics · p. 4

    Microbiota analyses were performed on a subgroup of 20 subjects, and serum analyses on the available samples (n=70).

    “Analyses on questionnaire data were performed on the intention-to-treat population using the last-observationcarried-forward method, whereas analyses on faecal samples were performed on 20 subjects, and analysis on serum on the number of samples available ( n = 70).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Sample size and randomization · p. 3

    The study randomized 43 patients per group instead of the 47 per group planned for 80% power at a 0.05 significance level, due to recruitment difficulties.

    “With a power of 80% and at a significance level of 0.05, the difference between the groups would be statistically significant with 47 patients per group. For reasons of recruitment difficulties, 43 subjects per group were finally randomized to the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Conclusions · p. 1

    The multispecies probiotic appears to be an effective and safe option for alleviating IBS symptoms and stabilizing the intestinal microbiota.

    “This multispecies probiotic seems to be an effective and safe option to alleviate symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, and to stabilize the intestinal microbiota.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Study design · p. 2

    The study was a 5-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group intervention with a 3-week washout before and a 3-week follow-up after.

    “The study was a 5-month randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group intervention with a preceding 3-week washout period and a 3-week follow-up period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Statistics · p. 4

    Questionnaire data were analysed on the intention-to-treat population using the last-observation-carried-forward method.

    “Analyses on questionnaire data were performed on the intention-to-treat population using the last-observationcarried-forward method, whereas analyses on faecal samples were performed on 20 subjects, and analysis on serum on the number of samples available ( n = 70).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § I NTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Cytokines have shown responses to probiotic supplementation in several trials.

    “Cytokines, on the other hand, have in several trials shown responses to probiotic supplementation. 21”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Sample size and randomization · p. 3

    Randomization used a computer-generated, blocked list independent of the research group, with a block size of 4.

    “Each subject was randomly allocated in the intervention groups according to a computer-generated, blocked randomization list independent of the research group, and with a block size of 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Sample size and randomization · p. 3

    Patients, investigators, the doctor and the study nurse were blinded using randomization codes kept confidential until data analysis ended.

    “The patients, the investigators, the doctor and the study nurse were blinded using randomization codes, which were kept confidential until the end of data analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Statistics · p. 4

    Cytokines were not statistically analysed because a high proportion of baseline samples fell below the detection limit.

    “Cytokines were not statistically analysed as such a high percentage of the baseline samples were below the detection limit (IFNc : 64%, TNFa : 100%, IL-2: 89%, IL-4: 79%, IL-6: 64% and IL-10: 99%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § I NTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Two different multispecies probiotic combinations have shown favourable effects on IBS symptoms: one containing two lactobacilli, one bifidobacteria and one propionic acid bacteria, and another containing eight strains (VSL#3).

    “Furthermore, two different multispecies probiotics have shown favourable effects on symptoms of IBS: a combination of two lactobacilli, one bifidobacteria and one propionic acid bacteria, 10 as well as a combination of eight strains, VSL#3. 11, 12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Statistics · p. 4

    No adjustment was made for multiple testing.

    “No adjustment was made for multiple testing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    IL-10 is important in IBS; the PBMC IL-10/IL-12 ratio is lower in IBS than in healthy people, and a Bifidobacterium can normalize this imbalance.

    “Particularly, IL-10 seems to play an important role in IBS: the IL-10 / IL-12 ratio in PBMCs is lower in subjects with IBS vs . healthy individuals, and this dysregulation can be normalized by a Bifidobacterium . 2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Only 20 patients' samples were analysed for microbiota, so the results' relevance should be interpreted cautiously.

    “It should, on the other hand, be kept in mind that only the samples of a subgroup of patients ( n = 20) were analysed for microbiota, and that the relevance of the results should therefore be interpreted with caution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    No agreement exists on a clinically meaningful improvement threshold, though suggestions include about 50% improvement in the primary endpoint and 10-15% in the global outcome over placebo.

    “There is no consensus as to what would constitute a clinically meaningful improvement, but an approximately 50% improvement in the primary end point and a 10-15% improvement in the global outcome measure over placebo has been suggested as clinically significant. 31, 32”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Plasma samples showed that multispecies probiotic supplementation raised IL-10 in infants with atopic eczema.

    “Using plasma samples, an increase in IL-10 by multispecies probiotic supplementation in infants with atopic eczema has been documented. 37”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Immunological marker results depend on subjects and probiotic strain, and local mucosal markers may matter more than serum markers in IBS-type low-grade inflammation.

    “Taken together, these findings suggest that results on immunological markers are dependent on the study subjects and on the probiotic strain used, and that the level of local, mucosal markers may be of greater importance than that of serum markers in IBS-type low-grade inflammation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Recent consensus reports advise using a single numerical index that combines IBS symptoms as a global measure.

    “According to recent consensus reports, global symptom measures that integrate IBS symptoms into a single numerical index are recommended. 31, 32”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Only a few RCTs of probiotics in IBS have examined microbiota changes, leaving limited knowledge about how microbiota modulation relates to symptom relief.

    “Few randomized-controlled trials on IBS and probiotics have investigated possible modifications of microbiota, and knowledge on the role of microbiota modulation in symptom relief is therefore limited. 6, 34”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [34] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    This trial is one of the earliest probiotic IBS trials to include an HRQL measure and show a benefit.

    “This study is among the first probiotic trials on IBS that has integrated the HRQL measure and demonstrated a beneficial effect. Only one earlier trial has shown similar results, 2 whereas a second study with the same strain of Bifidobacterium failed to see an effect on HRQL. 3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Benefits were particularly seen for distension and pain, consistent with reports that some lactobacilli induce pain-sensing receptor expression in intestinal epithelial cells.

    “Interestingly, we saw beneficial effects especially on distension and pain, as this agrees well with the recent findings that certain lactobacilli can induce the expression of pain-sensing receptors in intestinal epithelial cells. 33”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    IBS patients may have a genetic predisposition to a proinflammatory state.

    “Moreover, IBS patients appear to be genetically predisposed towards a proinflammatory state. 17, 18”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Microbiota stabilization may matter especially in IBS, since no single deviation is found in IBS microbiota but several bacterial composition changes have been described.

    “A stabilization of the microbiota composition may be particularly important in IBS, as no single deviance has been identified in IBS microbiota, but various alterations in the bacterial composition have been characterized. 23-25, 35”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Secondary outcome measures · p. 6

    Cytokine analysis was not performed statistically due to many baseline samples falling under the assay's detection threshold.

    “Cytokines were not statistically analysed as such a high percentage of the baseline samples were below the detection limit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Knowledge about probiotics and CRP is limited; some strains appear to affect CRP while others do not.

    “To date, not much is known about probiotics and CRP, but some strains seem to be able to influence CRP, whereas others have no effect. 37, 39, 40”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [39] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    The multispecies probiotic produced significant beneficial effects on IBS symptom severity, quality of life, and intestinal microbiota stability, but no effects on inflammatory markers.

    “Significant beneficial effects by the probiotic were seen on the severity of IBS symptoms, on quality of life and on the stability of intestinal microbiota, whereas no effects were observed on inflammatory markers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION · p. 9

    A daily dose of 4.8 × 10^9 bacterial cells of the multispecies probiotic is effective for relieving IBS symptoms and improving HRQL.

    “To conclude, our study provides evidence that a multispecies probiotic at a daily dose of 4.8 · 10 9 bacterial cells is effective in alleviating symptoms of IBS and improving HRQL.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Gut microbiota composition is closely linked to inflammation.

    “Microbiota composition is tightly interlinked with inflammation. 26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    Gut microbiota analysis is challenging because estimates suggest over 1000 bacterial species.

    “It should also be taken into account that analysing intestinal microbiota is in general tremendously challenging, as current estimates are that the microbiota comprises more than 1000 bacterial species. 36”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § REFERENCES · p. 9

    The multispecies probiotic may be an efficient and safe option for relieving IBS symptoms and stabilizing gut microbiota.

    “This multispecies probiotic could thus be an efficient and safe alternative for alleviating IBS symptoms and stabilizing the intestinal microbiota.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § DISCUSSION · p. 8

    The HITChip improves study of complex ecosystems like gut microbiota; earlier real-time PCR could not detect changes in predominant microbiota of IBS patients receiving multispecies probiotics.

    “This highlights the advances of the HITChip in investigating a complex ecosystem such as the intestinal microbiota, we were earlier unable to detect changes in the predominant microbiota of IBS patients on multispecies probiotic supplementation by applying real-time PCR. 34”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] source

      Not checked in the free run.

47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms of action behind probiotics in IBS are largely unknown.

    “Why certain strains are efficient while others are not is largely unknown, as are the mechanisms of action behind probiotics in IBS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Not much research has focused on whether alleviation of IBS symptoms by probiotics is associated with microbiota modulation.

    “However, not much research has been focused on whether alleviation of IBS symptoms by probiotics is associated with microbiota modulation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No earlier report has described an overall stabilization of global microbiota composition by probiotics.

    “Probiotics are considered to balance the microbiota, but an overall stabilization of the global microbiota composition has, to our knowledge, not been reported earlier.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Human gut diversity description is ongoing, so future phylogenetic studies will find new phylotypes absent from the current HITChip.

    “However, the description of the human gastrointestinal tract diversity is an ongoing process, and thus each new phylogenetic study will reveal a number of new bacterial phylotypes that are not included on the current version of the HITChip.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PBMC cytokine release analysis is more common and seems more sensitive than blood cytokine measurement.

    “It is more common to analyse the cytokine release from PBMCs than to measure blood values, and it appears that this approach is more sensitive.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All three studies that examined flatus as a primary end point, and four of seven studies in which flatus was a secondary end point only, showed no significant difference between seven specific probiotic treatments and control.

    “all three studies that examined flatus as a primary end point,30,57 and four of seven studies in which flatus was a secondary end point only,28–38 showed no significant difference between seven specific probiotic treatments and control.”
  • Twelve studies evaluated abdominal pain as a secondary end point only, with mixed results: one reported a negative effect, eight reported no significant effect, and three reported a significant beneficial effect.

    “Twelve studies evaluated abdominal pain as a secondary end point only. Results from these studies were mixed: one reported a negative effect of the specific probiotic treatment,59 eight (examining six different probiotics) reported no significant effect28–38 and three reported a significant beneficial effect of three different probiotics35,39”
  • Two studies reported no difference between specific probiotic treatments and placebo, and one study reported a significant worsening of diarrhoea with the specific probiotic treatment compared with placebo.

    “Two studies reported no difference between specific probiotic treatments and placebo,28–37 and one study reported a significant worsening of diarrhoea with the specific probiotic treatment compared with placebo.59”
  • Most randomized controlled trials of multistrain probiotics in IBS provided daily doses in the range of 5-9 × 10^9 cfu, and in most cases reductions in symptom severity score were observed; some but not all products significantly reduced abdominal pain symptoms.

    “Most of the products provided daily doses in the range of 5-9 • 10 9 cfu and, in most cases, reductions in symptom severity score were observed [17][18][19][20][21] and some, but not all, of the products significantly reduced abdominal pain symptoms.”
  • Probiotics might reshape the intestinal ecosystem, generating an ecological milieu unfavorable for the growth of harmful species by increasing the number of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria that stabilize the intestinal microbiota.

    “However, it has been suggested that probiotics might reshape the intestinal ecosystem generating an ecological milieu that is unfavorable for the growth of harmful species by increasing the number of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria [199] that will stabilize the intestinal microbiota [174,179] .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KAJANDER, K., MYLLYLUOMA, E., RAJILIĆ‐STOJANOVIĆ, M., KYRÖNPALO, S., RASMUSSEN, M., JÄRVENPÄÄ, S., ZOETENDAL, E. G., DE VOS, W. M., VAPAATALO, H., & KORPELA, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
KORPELA, R.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-06
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
48-57
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W1654600679
Cited by
367
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
FWCI
24.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TechnoRep (University of Belgrade – Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Valio
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, multispecies probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, quality of life, C-reactive protein, serum cytokines, Rome II criteria
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, C-Reactive Protein, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Intestines, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Interleukin-10, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Probiotics, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review