Cited by 1,070Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and DisordersBody Composition Measurement Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sarcopenic obesity: definition, cause and consequences

Open access
Stenholm, Sari, Harris, Tamara B, Rantanen, Taina, Visser, Marjolein, Kritchevsky, Stephen B, Ferrucci, Luigi·2008·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Older obese persons with decreased muscle mass or strength are at special risk for adverse outcomes. We discuss potential pathways to muscle impairment in obese individuals and the consequences that joint obesity and muscle impairment may have on health and disability. Tantamount to this discussion is whether low muscle mass or, rather, muscle weakness should be used for the definition. RECENT FINDINGS: Excess energy intake, physical inactivity, low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance and changes in hormonal milieu may lead to the development of so-called 'sarcopenic obesity'. It was originally believed that the culprit of age-related muscle weakness was a reduction in muscle mass, but it is now clear that changes in muscle composition and quality are predominant. We propose that the risk of adverse outcomes, such as functional limitation and mortality, is better estimated by considering jointly obesity and muscle strength rather than obesity and muscle mass and the term 'sarcopenic obesity' should be revisited. SUMMARY: Recognition of obese patients who have associated muscle problems is an essential goal for clinicians. Further research is needed to identify new target for prevention and cure of this important geriatric syndrome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0b013e328312c37d

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 112 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Rissanen, 1988, Int J Obes, 12, 391
  2. Duvigneaud, 2008, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 48, 201
  3. Bastard, 2006, Eur Cytokine Netw, 17, 4
  4. Guillet, 2, Spec No, 5S, 20
  5. Campbell, 1994, Am J Physiol, 266, E600
  6. Weltman, 2001, Eat Weight Disord, 6, 28
  7. Ceda, 2005, J Endocrinol Invest, 28, 96

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–120 of 120

Metadata

Authors
Stenholm, S., Harris, T. B., Rantanen, T., Visser, M., Kritchevsky, S. B., & Ferrucci, L.
Affiliations
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Ferrucci, Luigi
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2008-11
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
693-700
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157300817
Cited by
1,070
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 46
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministero della Salute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (N01AG-821336, N01[AG]916413, Z01AG000015, P30AG021332)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (263-MD-916413, 263MD 821336, R01MD009164)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
sarcopenic obesity, muscle weakness, muscle mass, muscle quality, muscle composition, older adults, obesity, physical inactivity, insulin resistance, low-grade inflammation, functional limitations, mortality, geriatric syndromes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Muscular Atrophy, Obesity, Risk Factors, Exercise, Comorbidity, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review