Cited by 14Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyLipid metabolism and disorders

Human genetic insights into lipoproteins and risk of cardiometabolic disease

Open access
Stitziel, Nathan O.·2017·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

Purpose of review: Human genetic studies have been successfully used to identify genes and pathways relevant to human biology. Using genetic instruments composed of loci associated with human lipid traits, recent studies have begun to clarify the causal role of major lipid fractions in risk of cardiometabolic disease. Recent findings: The causal relationship between LDL cholesterol and coronary disease has been firmly established. Of the remaining two major fractions, recent studies have found that HDL cholesterol is not likely to be a causal particle in atherogenesis, and have instead shifted the causal focus to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Subsequent results are refining this view to suggest that triglycerides themselves might not be causal, but instead may be a surrogate for the causal cholesterol content within this fraction. Other studies have used a similar approach to address the association between lipid fractions and risk of type 2 diabetes. Beyond genetic variation in the target of statin medications, reduced LDL cholesterol associated with multiple genes encoding current or prospective drug targets associated with increased diabetic risk. In addition, genetically lower HDL cholesterol and genetically lower triglycerides both appear to increase risk of type 2 diabetes. Summary: Results of these and future human genetic studies are positioned to provide substantive insights into the causal relationship between lipids and human disease, and should highlight mechanisms with important implications for our understanding of human biology and future lipid-altering therapeutic development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mol.0000000000000389

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mendelian randomization evidence suggests that elevated triglycerides linked to genetic variants may be a causal factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and possibly for premature all-cause mortality.

    “More recent evidence from mendelian randomization studies has shown that elevated triglycerides associated with genetic variants may be a causal factor for ASCVD and possibly for premature all-cause mortality.”

    From Omega-3 Fatty Acids for the Management of Hypertriglyceridemia: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association (2019) · cites this paper as [3]

    In the section on triglycerides and coronary artery disease (page not provided), the review discusses Mendelian randomization and genetic variants linking triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to coronary disease risk; its annotated reference 25 explicitly describes evidence for a causal role. Our copy does not report an association with premature all-cause mortality, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stitziel NO Stirrups KE Masca NG Coding Variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the Risk of Coronary Disease N Engl J Med 2016 374 1134 1144 This study demonstrated that genetic variation across multiple genes leading to loss and gain of LPL function associated with risk and protection of coronary artery disease, respectively, showing a titratable effect on disease for lipoprotein lipase and its endogenous regulators. 26934567 PMC4850838

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stitziel, N. O.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Stitziel, Nathan O.
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2017-04
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
113-119
ISSN
  • 0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6535
OpenAlex
W2568209410
Cited by
14
References
49
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL114642, R01HL131961)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1HG008853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
lipoproteins, cardiometabolic disease, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, triglycerides, coronary disease, atherogenesis, type 2 diabetes, genetic instruments, causal inference, statins
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Lipoproteins, Risk, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review