Cited by 211Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthParaoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms

Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: a mendelian randomisation study

Open access
Voight, Benjamin F, Peloso, Gina M, Orho-Melander, Marju, Frikke-Schmidt, Ruth, Barbalic, Maja, Jensen, Majken K, Hindy, George, Hólm, Hilma +118 more·2012·The Lancet

Abstract

Background High plasma HDL cholesterol is associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction, but whether this association is causal is unclear. Exploiting the fact that genotypes are randomly assigned at meiosis, are independent of non-genetic confounding, and are unmodified by disease processes, mendelian randomisation can be used to test the hypothesis that the association of a plasma biomarker with disease is causal.Methods We performed two mendelian randomisation analyses. First, we used as an instrument a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the endothelial lipase gene (LIPG Asn396Ser) and tested this SNP in 20 studies (20,913 myocardial infarction cases, 95,407 controls). Second, we used as an instrument a genetic score consisting of 14 common SNPs that exclusively associate with HDL cholesterol and tested this score in up to 12,482 cases of myocardial infarction and 41,331 controls. As a positive control, we also tested a genetic score of 13 common SNPs exclusively associated with LDL cholesterol.Findings Carriers of the LIPG 396Ser allele (2·6% frequency) had higher HDL cholesterol (0·14 mmol/L higher, p=8×10(-13)) but similar levels of other lipid and non-lipid risk factors for myocardial infarction compared with non-carriers. This difference in HDL cholesterol is expected to decrease risk of myocardial infarction by 13% (odds ratio [OR] 0·87, 95% CI 0·84-0·91). However, we noted that the 396Ser allele was not associated with risk of myocardial infarction (OR 0·99, 95% CI 0·88-1·11, p=0·85). From observational epidemiology, an increase of 1 SD in HDL cholesterol was associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction (OR 0·62, 95% CI 0·58-0·66). However, a 1 SD increase in HDL cholesterol due to genetic score was not associated with risk of myocardial infarction (OR 0·93, 95% CI 0·68-1·26, p=0·63). For LDL cholesterol, the estimate from observational epidemiology (a 1 SD increase in LDL cholesterol associated with OR 1·54, 95% CI 1·45-1·63) was concordant with that from genetic score (OR 2·13, 95% CI 1·69-2·69, p=2×10(-10)).Interpretation Some genetic mechanisms that raise plasma HDL cholesterol do not seem to lower risk of myocardial infarction. These data challenge the concept that raising of plasma HDL cholesterol will uniformly translate into reductions in risk of myocardial infarction.Funding US National Institutes of Health, The Wellcome Trust, European Union, British Heart Foundation, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60312-2

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mendelian randomization studies support the notion that HDL-C may not be causally related to coronary heart disease risk.

    “Mendelian randomization studies further support the notion that HDL-C may not be causally related to CHD risk”

    From The Forgotten Lipids: Triglycerides, Remnant Cholesterol, and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk (2019) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Discussion reports that HDL-C-raising genetic variants did not reduce myocardial infarction risk and suggests that plasma HDL-C’s association with myocardial infarction may be indirect. This supports the claim’s cautious causal interpretation, but the study tested myocardial infarction, not the broader category of coronary heart disease outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mendelian randomization studies do not provide compelling evidence that HDL-C is causally associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.

    “In contrast, Mendelian randomization studies do not provide compelling evidence that HDL-C is causally associated with the risk of ASCVD [49,61,62].”
  • The causative protective role of HDL-C against cardiovascular disease has been questioned by Mendelian randomization studies.

    “The causative role of HDL-C for protection against CVD has been questioned in several studies utilizing Mendelian randomization. 87,89,91,92”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [92]

  • GWAS findings have increasing translational impact through identification of novel therapeutic targets, prioritization and deprioritization of existing targets, and development of polygenic scores that quantify individual genetic risk.

    “As described below, findings from GWAS have increasing translational impact through identification of novel therapeutic targets67, prioritization (and deprioritization) of existing ones68 and development of polygenic scores that quantify individual genetic risk69.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [68]

  • The causative role of HDL-C for protection against CVD has been questioned in several Mendelian randomization studies.

    “The causative role of HDL-C for protection against CVD has been questioned in several studies utilizing Mendelian randomization.87,89,91,92”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [92]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voight, B. F., Peloso, G. M., Orho-Melander, M., Frikke-Schmidt, R., Barbalic, M., Jensen, M. K., Hindy, G., Hólm, H., Ding, E. L., Johnson, T., Schunkert, H., Samani, N. J., Clarke, R., Hopewell, J. C., Thompson, J. F., Li, M., Thorleifsson, G., Newton-Cheh, C., Musunuru, K., Pirruccello, J. P., Saleheen, D., Chen, L., Stewart, A. F., Schillert, A., Thorsteinsdottir, U., Thorgeirsson, G., Anand, S., Engert, J. C., Morgan, T., Spertus, J., Stoll, M., Berger, K., Martinelli, N., Girelli, D., McKeown, P. P., Patterson, C. C., Epstein, S. E., Devaney, J., Burnett, M.-S., Mooser, V., Ripatti, S., Surakka, I., Nieminen, M. S., Sinisalo, J., Lokki, M.-L., Perola, M., Havulinna, A., de Faire, U., Gigante, B., Ingelsson, E., Zeller, T., Wild, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Klungel, O. H., Maitland-van der Zee, A.-H., Peters, B. J. M., de Boer, A., Grobbee, D. E., Kamphuisen, P. W., Deneer, V. H. M., Elbers, C. C., Onland-Moret, N. C., Hofker, M. H., Wijmenga, C., Verschuren, W. M., Boer, J. M., van der Schouw, Y. T., Rasheed, A., Frossard, P., Demissie, S., Willer, C., Do, R., Ordovas, J. M., Abecasis, G. R., Boehnke, M., Mohlke, K. L., Daly, M. J., Guiducci, C., Burtt, N. P., Surti, A., Gonzalez, E., Purcell, S., Gabriel, S., Marrugat, J., Peden, J., Erdmann, J., Diemert, P., Willenborg, C., König, I. R., Fischer, M., Hengstenberg, C., Ziegler, A., Buysschaert, I., Lambrechts, D., Van de Werf, F., Fox, K. A., El Mokhtari, N. E., Rubin, D., Schrezenmeir, J., Schreiber, S., Schäfer, A., Danesh, J., Blankenberg, S., Roberts, R., McPherson, R., Watkins, H., Hall, A. S., Overvad, K., Rimm, E., Boerwinkle, E., Tybjaerg-Hansen, A., Cupples, L. A., Reilly, M. P., Melander, O., Mannucci, P. M., Ardissino, D., Siscovick, D., Elosua, R., Stefansson, K., O'Donnell, C. J., Salomaa, V., Rader, D. J., Peltonen, L., Schwartz, S. M., Altshuler, D., & Kathiresan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • deCODE Genetics (Iceland) (IS)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Ottawa Heart Institute (CA)
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Center for Non-Communicable Diseases (PK)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Hospital del Mar Research Institute (ES)
  • University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • Max Rubner Institut (DE)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • Ospedale di Parma (IT)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Kathiresan, Sekar
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
380
Issue
9841
Pages
572-580
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1240353884
Cited by
148
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (090532)
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/014/24067)
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-025195)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms
Keywords
HDL cholesterol, myocardial infarction, causal inference, endothelial lipase, genetic score, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, genetic instruments, single nucleotide polymorphisms, lipid biomarkers, confounding by indication, reverse causality
MeSH terms
Gene Frequency, Humans, Lipase, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review