Cited by 16Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

A primary care pediatrician’s guide to assessing problematic interactive media use

Nereim, Cameron, Bickham, David, Rich, Michael·2019·Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the literature and provide a guide to assessing patients with problematic interactive media use (PIMU). RECENT FINDINGS: 0.3-1.0% of the world population meets criteria for internet gaming disorder (IGD). 26.8-83.3% of adolescents meeting criteria for internet addiction have comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. IGD is associated with increased anxiety and social anxiety/phobias. Group counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy, and sports intervention are associated with significant reductions in internet addiction. SUMMARY: With the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 inclusion of IGD under 'Conditions for Further Study' and the addition of gaming disorder to International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11, the idea that PIMU is a mental health disorder gained traction. Although certain populations may be at increased risk, all children and adolescents should be screened for PIMU given now-normal heavy media usage rates. Effective treatment of PIMU starts with identification and management of comorbid mental and behavioral health problems. Depending on their degree of functional impairment, patients may benefit from various forms of psychotherapy with coordinated outpatient management or may warrant higher level of care in one of several established residential treatment programs. Few studies have evaluated pharmacologic approaches to treating PIMU, but some medications targeting comorbid mental and behavioral health conditions improve PIMU-related behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mop.0000000000000771

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders have higher rates of social media use and may use screens to support social and communication skills.

    “adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders have higher rates of social media use [28] and may use screens to support social and communication skills [29]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nereim, C., Bickham, D., & Rich, M.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Nereim, Cameron
Venue
Current Opinion in Pediatrics
Published
2019-08
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
435-441
ISSN
  • 1040-8703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-698X
OpenAlex
W2942262327
Cited by
16
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet gaming disorder, internet addiction, adolescents, children, social anxiety, screening, cognitive behavioral therapy, group counseling, sport-based intervention, residential treatment, pharmacotherapy, primary care
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Pediatricians, Adolescent, Child, Humans, Primary Health Care, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, Internet, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review