Cited by 171Infant Nutrition and HealthMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Physiological and bifidogenic effects of prebiotic supplements in infant formulae

Veereman‐Wauters, G, Staelens, S, Van de Broek, H, Plaskie, K, Wesling, F, Roger, LC, McCartney, AL, Assam, P·2011·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled trial involving 110 healthy neonates studied physiological and bifidogenic effects of galactooligosaccharides (GOS), oligofructose, and long-chain inulin (fructooligosaccharides, FOS) in formula. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to Orafti Synergy1 (50 oligofructose:50 FOS) 0.4 g/dL or 0.8 g/dL, GOS:FOS (90:10) 0.8 g/dL, or a standard formula according to Good Clinical Practice guidelines. A breast-fed group was included for comparison. Outcome parameters were weight, length, intake, stool characteristics, crying, regurgitation, vomiting, adverse events, and fecal bacterial population counts. Statistical analyses used nonparametric tests. RESULTS: During the first month of life, weight, length, intake, and crying increased significantly in all of the groups. Regurgitation and vomiting scores were low and similar. Stool frequency decreased significantly and similarly in all of the formula groups but was lower than in the breast-fed group. All of the prebiotic groups maintained soft stools, only slightly harder than those of breast-fed infants. The standard group had significantly harder stools at weeks 2 and 4 compared with 1 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0279). The total number of fecal bacteria increased in all of the prebiotic groups (9.82, 9.73, and 9.91 to 10.34, 10.38, and 10.37, respectively, log10 cells/g feces, P = 0.2298) and more closely resembled the breast-fed pattern. Numbers of lactic acid bacteria, bacteroides, and clostridia were comparable. In the SYN1 0.8 g/dL and GOS:FOS groups, Bifidobacterium counts were significantly higher at D14 and 28 compared with D3 and were comparable with the breast-fed group. Tolerance and growth were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Stool consistency and bacterial composition of infants taking SYN1 0.8 g/dL or GOS:FOS-supplemented formula were closer to the breast-fed pattern. There was no risk of dehydration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182139f39

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veereman‐Wauters, G., Staelens, S., Van de Broek, H., Plaskie, K., Wesling, F., Roger, L., McCartney, A., & Assam, P.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
  • Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Belgium
  • Department of Neonatology Belgium
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
  • ZNA Middelheim Hospital (BE)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
Corresponding author
Staelens, S
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
763-771
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2074114437
Cited by
171
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
prebiotics, infant formula, galactooligosaccharides, fructooligosaccharides, bifidogenic effect, Bifidobacterium, fecal microbiota, stool consistency, infant growth, regurgitation, neonates
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium, Breast Feeding, Energy Intake, Crying, Defecation, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Food Microbiology, Growth, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Oligosaccharides, Prospective Studies, Vomiting, Dietary Supplements, Infant Formula, Gastrointestinal Tract, Prebiotics, Bacterial Load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review