Cited by 12Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Narcissism and Quality of Life: The Mediating Role of Relationship Patterns

Abstract

Pathological narcissism is associated with decreased quality of life, even when accounting for psychiatric comorbidity, but the processes behind this association are unclear. Here, we evaluate whether disturbed relatedness accounts for the negative association between narcissistic pathology and quality of life. Patients in day hospital treatment for personality pathology (N = 218, 70% female; mean age, 37.3 years) completed measures of personality disorder features, quality of life, and global symptoms before beginning treatment. Quality of object relations was assessed through semistructured interviews. Regression-based mediation analyses showed that narcissistic personality traits relate to quality of life through quality of object relations, controlling for other personality disorders and psychiatric distress. These results highlight the importance of problematic relationship patterns for the low quality of life associated with pathological narcissism. Clinicians working with narcissistic individuals should consider psychotherapies that promote mature relatedness and should attend to facilitating the quality of patients' relationships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0000000000001170

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ellison, W. D., Acuff, M. C., Kealy, D., Joyce, A. S., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Trinity University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Ellison, William D.
  • Acuff, M. Chase
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2020-03-31
Volume
208
Issue
8
Pages
613-618
ISSN
  • 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-736X
OpenAlex
W3005553816
Cited by
12
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (57672, 63645)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
pathological narcissism, narcissistic personality traits, quality of life, object relations, relatedness, personality disorders, mediation, day hospital treatment, relationship patterns
MeSH terms
Adult, Alberta, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Object Attachment, Outpatients, Personality Disorders, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review